Public participation and democratization: effects on the production and consumption of science and technology

In this article, I discuss the democratizing effects of public participation in science and technology (PPST). Various forms of PPST have emerged as reactions of civil society or as institutionalized responses of States to science-society conflicts. I distinguish PPST into three types, which I call...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Noela Invernizzi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis Group 2020-01-01
Series:Tapuya
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/25729861.2020.1835225
_version_ 1818452456698281984
author Noela Invernizzi
author_facet Noela Invernizzi
author_sort Noela Invernizzi
collection DOAJ
description In this article, I discuss the democratizing effects of public participation in science and technology (PPST). Various forms of PPST have emerged as reactions of civil society or as institutionalized responses of States to science-society conflicts. I distinguish PPST into three types, which I call institutionalized, activist and conflictive, and at the margins of mainstream science and technology. Based on a broad literature review and analysis of case studies, I examine the participating actors by identifying their position in the productive structure, their form of participation, the expert-lay relationship and the constitution of the discussion agenda. Then, I evaluate the democratizing effects of lay participation on the configuration of scientific agendas, on the direction of development of technological trajectories and on the imposition of norms or limits on the use of technology. I argue that this typology brings to focus some issues not highlighted in other existing public participation typologies. It identifies, from a political economy perspective, the position in the productive structure from which the actors participate and distinguishes the democratizing effects of public participation on the production and consumption of science and technology.
first_indexed 2024-12-14T21:23:23Z
format Article
id doaj.art-bf4ea344fae44898910546a6f57526b6
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2572-9861
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-14T21:23:23Z
publishDate 2020-01-01
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
record_format Article
series Tapuya
spelling doaj.art-bf4ea344fae44898910546a6f57526b62022-12-21T22:46:53ZengTaylor & Francis GroupTapuya2572-98612020-01-013122725310.1080/25729861.2020.18352251835225Public participation and democratization: effects on the production and consumption of science and technologyNoela Invernizzi0Universidade Federal do ParanáIn this article, I discuss the democratizing effects of public participation in science and technology (PPST). Various forms of PPST have emerged as reactions of civil society or as institutionalized responses of States to science-society conflicts. I distinguish PPST into three types, which I call institutionalized, activist and conflictive, and at the margins of mainstream science and technology. Based on a broad literature review and analysis of case studies, I examine the participating actors by identifying their position in the productive structure, their form of participation, the expert-lay relationship and the constitution of the discussion agenda. Then, I evaluate the democratizing effects of lay participation on the configuration of scientific agendas, on the direction of development of technological trajectories and on the imposition of norms or limits on the use of technology. I argue that this typology brings to focus some issues not highlighted in other existing public participation typologies. It identifies, from a political economy perspective, the position in the productive structure from which the actors participate and distinguishes the democratizing effects of public participation on the production and consumption of science and technology.http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/25729861.2020.1835225public participation in s&tconsensus conferencesactivismalternative technologiesdemocracy
spellingShingle Noela Invernizzi
Public participation and democratization: effects on the production and consumption of science and technology
Tapuya
public participation in s&t
consensus conferences
activism
alternative technologies
democracy
title Public participation and democratization: effects on the production and consumption of science and technology
title_full Public participation and democratization: effects on the production and consumption of science and technology
title_fullStr Public participation and democratization: effects on the production and consumption of science and technology
title_full_unstemmed Public participation and democratization: effects on the production and consumption of science and technology
title_short Public participation and democratization: effects on the production and consumption of science and technology
title_sort public participation and democratization effects on the production and consumption of science and technology
topic public participation in s&t
consensus conferences
activism
alternative technologies
democracy
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/25729861.2020.1835225
work_keys_str_mv AT noelainvernizzi publicparticipationanddemocratizationeffectsontheproductionandconsumptionofscienceandtechnology