Does an Animal–Visitor Interactive Experience Drive Conservation Action?
Inspiring visitors to engage in conservation-related behaviour following a zoo visit is a primary objective for most zoos. Animal–visitor interactive (AVI) experiences are often central to this goal. Yet, these interactive experiences are insufficiently evaluated from both the visitors’ and captive...
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
MDPI AG
2021-09-01
|
| Series: | Journal of Zoological and Botanical Gardens |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2673-5636/2/3/34 |
| _version_ | 1797518549496889344 |
|---|---|
| author | Courtney Keane Collins Sean McKeown Ruth O’Riordan |
| author_facet | Courtney Keane Collins Sean McKeown Ruth O’Riordan |
| author_sort | Courtney Keane Collins |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Inspiring visitors to engage in conservation-related behaviour following a zoo visit is a primary objective for most zoos. Animal–visitor interactive (AVI) experiences are often central to this goal. Yet, these interactive experiences are insufficiently evaluated from both the visitors’ and captive animals’ perspectives. The current study took place at Fota Wildlife Park and involved the construction of an environmental enrichment device during an interactive visitor experience with Sumatran tigers (<i>Panthera tigris sumatrae</i>). It aimed to simultaneously encourage pro-conservation behaviour in visitors and promote animal welfare. Visitors (<i>n</i> = 51) completed a survey, observed the tigers’ behaviour and made a pledge to help tigers in the wild after completion of the AVI. Tiger behaviour was simultaneously observed by a trained researcher using occurrence or non-occurrence sampling, which found no indication that tiger welfare was compromised during the activity and was likely enhanced by engaging with the enrichment. Additionally, visitors observed a range of tigers’ behaviours. The results indicated that some visitors (8%) had continued with their pledge six weeks after the experience, and most visitors exhibited a high level of knowledge and a positive attitude towards tigers. The use of enrichment during AVIs may be a positive link between the visitor experience and animal welfare. These results can be used to guide AVIs in zoos which aim to connect people with nature and drive pro-conservation behaviour in visitors. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-10T07:31:12Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-bf5320dbe2b74ec2b77ae1b9291f458a |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2673-5636 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-10T07:31:12Z |
| publishDate | 2021-09-01 |
| publisher | MDPI AG |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Journal of Zoological and Botanical Gardens |
| spelling | doaj.art-bf5320dbe2b74ec2b77ae1b9291f458a2023-11-22T13:52:27ZengMDPI AGJournal of Zoological and Botanical Gardens2673-56362021-09-012347348610.3390/jzbg2030034Does an Animal–Visitor Interactive Experience Drive Conservation Action?Courtney Keane Collins0Sean McKeown1Ruth O’Riordan2School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences and the Environmental Research Institute, University College Cork, T23 N73K Cork, IrelandCarrigtwohill, Co., Fota Wildlife Park, T45 CD93 Cork, IrelandSchool of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences and the Environmental Research Institute, University College Cork, T23 N73K Cork, IrelandInspiring visitors to engage in conservation-related behaviour following a zoo visit is a primary objective for most zoos. Animal–visitor interactive (AVI) experiences are often central to this goal. Yet, these interactive experiences are insufficiently evaluated from both the visitors’ and captive animals’ perspectives. The current study took place at Fota Wildlife Park and involved the construction of an environmental enrichment device during an interactive visitor experience with Sumatran tigers (<i>Panthera tigris sumatrae</i>). It aimed to simultaneously encourage pro-conservation behaviour in visitors and promote animal welfare. Visitors (<i>n</i> = 51) completed a survey, observed the tigers’ behaviour and made a pledge to help tigers in the wild after completion of the AVI. Tiger behaviour was simultaneously observed by a trained researcher using occurrence or non-occurrence sampling, which found no indication that tiger welfare was compromised during the activity and was likely enhanced by engaging with the enrichment. Additionally, visitors observed a range of tigers’ behaviours. The results indicated that some visitors (8%) had continued with their pledge six weeks after the experience, and most visitors exhibited a high level of knowledge and a positive attitude towards tigers. The use of enrichment during AVIs may be a positive link between the visitor experience and animal welfare. These results can be used to guide AVIs in zoos which aim to connect people with nature and drive pro-conservation behaviour in visitors.https://www.mdpi.com/2673-5636/2/3/34conservationenvironmental educationzooanimal behaviourvisitor experienceinteractive experience |
| spellingShingle | Courtney Keane Collins Sean McKeown Ruth O’Riordan Does an Animal–Visitor Interactive Experience Drive Conservation Action? Journal of Zoological and Botanical Gardens conservation environmental education zoo animal behaviour visitor experience interactive experience |
| title | Does an Animal–Visitor Interactive Experience Drive Conservation Action? |
| title_full | Does an Animal–Visitor Interactive Experience Drive Conservation Action? |
| title_fullStr | Does an Animal–Visitor Interactive Experience Drive Conservation Action? |
| title_full_unstemmed | Does an Animal–Visitor Interactive Experience Drive Conservation Action? |
| title_short | Does an Animal–Visitor Interactive Experience Drive Conservation Action? |
| title_sort | does an animal visitor interactive experience drive conservation action |
| topic | conservation environmental education zoo animal behaviour visitor experience interactive experience |
| url | https://www.mdpi.com/2673-5636/2/3/34 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT courtneykeanecollins doesananimalvisitorinteractiveexperiencedriveconservationaction AT seanmckeown doesananimalvisitorinteractiveexperiencedriveconservationaction AT ruthoriordan doesananimalvisitorinteractiveexperiencedriveconservationaction |