The Issue of Competition between Penal Norms and Nonpenal Norms in the Process of Defending the Order of Right Against the Illegality Related to the Crediting Process

The author tackles the issue of competition between penal norms and nonpenal norms in theprocess of defending the order of right against the illegality related to the crediting process. The interferenceof penal right spheres and the ones of other branches of law (firstly the civil right) is specific...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Svetlana Prodan, Anatolie Donciu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Danubius University 2012-05-01
Series:EIRP Proceedings
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.proceedings.univ-danubius.ro/index.php/eirp/article/view/1420/1220
_version_ 1818163336698658816
author Svetlana Prodan
Anatolie Donciu
author_facet Svetlana Prodan
Anatolie Donciu
author_sort Svetlana Prodan
collection DOAJ
description The author tackles the issue of competition between penal norms and nonpenal norms in theprocess of defending the order of right against the illegality related to the crediting process. The interferenceof penal right spheres and the ones of other branches of law (firstly the civil right) is specific for the processof defending against the economic offences. Or, to obtain and grant a credit firstly constitute the settlementobject of the civil law. The author analyzes different situations and underlines that the civic responsibilitydoesn’t automatically exclude the possibility of applying the penal responsibility. Also, the „banking”responsibility that is specific to the banking law is analyzed and its relation with the other responsibilities isrevealed. The author comes to the conclusion that it is not necessary to unincriminate the deeds stipulated inart.238 and 239 of the Criminal Code of Republic of Moldova. An evident social necessity for juridical-penaldefence of the rights and interests of honest participants at crediting relations exists. The existence andapplication of these norms constitus a guarantee of preventing and combating the illegalities related tocrediting, characterized by a high prejudicial level, that are commited by the dishonest participants. Theprejudicial level is the criterion that permits the application by itself either of the „banking” responsibility orpenal responsibility. In the same time, each of the specified juridical responsibility forms may beaccomapnied by the civic responsibility.
first_indexed 2024-12-11T16:47:57Z
format Article
id doaj.art-bf6446b024e146b1b8720ef56443d206
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2067-9211
2069-9344
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-11T16:47:57Z
publishDate 2012-05-01
publisher Danubius University
record_format Article
series EIRP Proceedings
spelling doaj.art-bf6446b024e146b1b8720ef56443d2062022-12-22T00:58:10ZengDanubius UniversityEIRP Proceedings2067-92112069-93442012-05-01717785The Issue of Competition between Penal Norms and Nonpenal Norms in the Process of Defending the Order of Right Against the Illegality Related to the Crediting ProcessSvetlana ProdanAnatolie DonciuThe author tackles the issue of competition between penal norms and nonpenal norms in theprocess of defending the order of right against the illegality related to the crediting process. The interferenceof penal right spheres and the ones of other branches of law (firstly the civil right) is specific for the processof defending against the economic offences. Or, to obtain and grant a credit firstly constitute the settlementobject of the civil law. The author analyzes different situations and underlines that the civic responsibilitydoesn’t automatically exclude the possibility of applying the penal responsibility. Also, the „banking”responsibility that is specific to the banking law is analyzed and its relation with the other responsibilities isrevealed. The author comes to the conclusion that it is not necessary to unincriminate the deeds stipulated inart.238 and 239 of the Criminal Code of Republic of Moldova. An evident social necessity for juridical-penaldefence of the rights and interests of honest participants at crediting relations exists. The existence andapplication of these norms constitus a guarantee of preventing and combating the illegalities related tocrediting, characterized by a high prejudicial level, that are commited by the dishonest participants. Theprejudicial level is the criterion that permits the application by itself either of the „banking” responsibility orpenal responsibility. In the same time, each of the specified juridical responsibility forms may beaccomapnied by the civic responsibility.http://www.proceedings.univ-danubius.ro/index.php/eirp/article/view/1420/1220child abusesexual abuseprophylaxis
spellingShingle Svetlana Prodan
Anatolie Donciu
The Issue of Competition between Penal Norms and Nonpenal Norms in the Process of Defending the Order of Right Against the Illegality Related to the Crediting Process
EIRP Proceedings
child abuse
sexual abuse
prophylaxis
title The Issue of Competition between Penal Norms and Nonpenal Norms in the Process of Defending the Order of Right Against the Illegality Related to the Crediting Process
title_full The Issue of Competition between Penal Norms and Nonpenal Norms in the Process of Defending the Order of Right Against the Illegality Related to the Crediting Process
title_fullStr The Issue of Competition between Penal Norms and Nonpenal Norms in the Process of Defending the Order of Right Against the Illegality Related to the Crediting Process
title_full_unstemmed The Issue of Competition between Penal Norms and Nonpenal Norms in the Process of Defending the Order of Right Against the Illegality Related to the Crediting Process
title_short The Issue of Competition between Penal Norms and Nonpenal Norms in the Process of Defending the Order of Right Against the Illegality Related to the Crediting Process
title_sort issue of competition between penal norms and nonpenal norms in the process of defending the order of right against the illegality related to the crediting process
topic child abuse
sexual abuse
prophylaxis
url http://www.proceedings.univ-danubius.ro/index.php/eirp/article/view/1420/1220
work_keys_str_mv AT svetlanaprodan theissueofcompetitionbetweenpenalnormsandnonpenalnormsintheprocessofdefendingtheorderofrightagainsttheillegalityrelatedtothecreditingprocess
AT anatoliedonciu theissueofcompetitionbetweenpenalnormsandnonpenalnormsintheprocessofdefendingtheorderofrightagainsttheillegalityrelatedtothecreditingprocess
AT svetlanaprodan issueofcompetitionbetweenpenalnormsandnonpenalnormsintheprocessofdefendingtheorderofrightagainsttheillegalityrelatedtothecreditingprocess
AT anatoliedonciu issueofcompetitionbetweenpenalnormsandnonpenalnormsintheprocessofdefendingtheorderofrightagainsttheillegalityrelatedtothecreditingprocess