Risk of Bias from Inclusion of Currently Diagnosed or Treated Patients in Studies of Depression Screening Tool Accuracy: A Cross-Sectional Analysis of Recently Published Primary Studies and Meta-Analyses.
BACKGROUND:Depression screening can improve upon usual care only if screening tools accurately identify depressed patients who would not otherwise be recognized by healthcare providers. Inclusion of patients already being treated for depression in studies of screening tool accuracy would inflate est...
Main Authors: | Danielle B Rice, Brett D Thombs |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2016-01-01
|
Series: | PLoS ONE |
Online Access: | http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4769287?pdf=render |
Similar Items
-
Sample size and precision of estimates in studies of depression screening tool accuracy: A meta‐research review of studies published in 2018–2021
by: Elsa‐Lynn Nassar, et al.
Published: (2022-06-01) -
Transparency and completeness of reporting of depression screening tool accuracy studies: A meta‐research review of adherence to the Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies statement
by: Elsa‐Lynn Nassar, et al.
Published: (2023-03-01) -
Engagement of people with lived experience in studies published in high-impact psychiatry journals: meta-research review
by: Claire Adams, et al.
Published: (2024-11-01) -
A proposed method of bias adjustment for meta-analyses of published observational studies.
by: Thompson, S, et al.
Published: (2011) -
An empirical comparison of statistical methods for multiple cut-off diagnostic test accuracy meta-analysis of the Edinburgh postnatal depression scale (EPDS) depression screening tool using published results vs individual participant data
by: Zelalem F. Negeri, et al.
Published: (2024-02-01)