Perspectives on the Doctor of Public Health (DrPH) education among students and alumni in the United States: a cross-sectional national online survey

Abstract Background This study explored the current and desired identity of the DrPH degree, focusing on whether the competencies set by the Council on Education for Public Health (CEPH) adequately prepare DrPH graduates for effective public health practice. Additionally, the study investigated the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Chulwoo Park, Cindy Delgado, Ans Irfan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2023-08-01
Series:BMC Public Health
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-16402-3
_version_ 1797451223426662400
author Chulwoo Park
Cindy Delgado
Ans Irfan
author_facet Chulwoo Park
Cindy Delgado
Ans Irfan
author_sort Chulwoo Park
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background This study explored the current and desired identity of the DrPH degree, focusing on whether the competencies set by the Council on Education for Public Health (CEPH) adequately prepare DrPH graduates for effective public health practice. Additionally, the study investigated the necessity of standardization in DrPH training, referring to a consensus-driven approach that equips future public health practitioners with practical skillsets applicable in real-world scenarios. Methods A national cross-sectional online survey titled “National DrPH leaders & practitioners needs assessment” was conducted from November 2020 to February 2021. The survey was based on a self-report by DrPH students and DrPH professionals, consisting of the following two main components: (1) how their DrPH training aligns with CEPH competencies and (2) how they perceive the identity of the DrPH degree. Convenience sampling was used to collect the data, which may have limited representation for all DrPH institutions in the United States. Results A total of 222 participants (140 current DrPH students and 82 alumni) completed the survey. The mean of the 10-point Likert scale for the degree to which the DrPH training aligns with 26 CEPH competencies (1: not at all – 10: absolutely) ranged from 6.3 (SD: 2.78) to 7.96 (SD: 2.16). The majority of participants (191/222, 86.04%) were satisfied with the knowledge and skills reflected in their training based on the CEPH competencies. However, more than half of the participants (117/222, 52.70%) sought additional professional development/training outside their institutions. DrPH leaders and practitioners faced barriers where the value of their work might not be fully recognized and endorsed. Participants indicated that the DrPH education should be further distinguished from the PhD education. Conclusions The DrPH degree holds significant value within the academic sphere of public health practice in the United States. However, its distinction from PhD programs poses a challenge for employers and organizations in the field, requiring attention from higher education programs. By solidifying the DrPH’s identity, graduates can effectively address diverse public health issues and contribute to creating a safe and healthy environment, including addressing the challenges posed by the COVID-19 pandemic.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T14:51:35Z
format Article
id doaj.art-bf72498b2bfa4c5da585b636ec350551
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1471-2458
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T14:51:35Z
publishDate 2023-08-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Public Health
spelling doaj.art-bf72498b2bfa4c5da585b636ec3505512023-11-26T14:28:42ZengBMCBMC Public Health1471-24582023-08-0123111410.1186/s12889-023-16402-3Perspectives on the Doctor of Public Health (DrPH) education among students and alumni in the United States: a cross-sectional national online surveyChulwoo Park0Cindy Delgado1Ans Irfan2Department of Public Health and Recreation, San José State UniversityClaremont Graduate UniversityDepartment of Environmental and Occupational Health, The George Washington UniversityAbstract Background This study explored the current and desired identity of the DrPH degree, focusing on whether the competencies set by the Council on Education for Public Health (CEPH) adequately prepare DrPH graduates for effective public health practice. Additionally, the study investigated the necessity of standardization in DrPH training, referring to a consensus-driven approach that equips future public health practitioners with practical skillsets applicable in real-world scenarios. Methods A national cross-sectional online survey titled “National DrPH leaders & practitioners needs assessment” was conducted from November 2020 to February 2021. The survey was based on a self-report by DrPH students and DrPH professionals, consisting of the following two main components: (1) how their DrPH training aligns with CEPH competencies and (2) how they perceive the identity of the DrPH degree. Convenience sampling was used to collect the data, which may have limited representation for all DrPH institutions in the United States. Results A total of 222 participants (140 current DrPH students and 82 alumni) completed the survey. The mean of the 10-point Likert scale for the degree to which the DrPH training aligns with 26 CEPH competencies (1: not at all – 10: absolutely) ranged from 6.3 (SD: 2.78) to 7.96 (SD: 2.16). The majority of participants (191/222, 86.04%) were satisfied with the knowledge and skills reflected in their training based on the CEPH competencies. However, more than half of the participants (117/222, 52.70%) sought additional professional development/training outside their institutions. DrPH leaders and practitioners faced barriers where the value of their work might not be fully recognized and endorsed. Participants indicated that the DrPH education should be further distinguished from the PhD education. Conclusions The DrPH degree holds significant value within the academic sphere of public health practice in the United States. However, its distinction from PhD programs poses a challenge for employers and organizations in the field, requiring attention from higher education programs. By solidifying the DrPH’s identity, graduates can effectively address diverse public health issues and contribute to creating a safe and healthy environment, including addressing the challenges posed by the COVID-19 pandemic.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-16402-3Association of Schools and Programs of Public Health (ASPPH)Council on Education for Public Health (CEPH)Doctor of Public Health (DrPH)Survey data analysisCross-sectional studyDrPH students
spellingShingle Chulwoo Park
Cindy Delgado
Ans Irfan
Perspectives on the Doctor of Public Health (DrPH) education among students and alumni in the United States: a cross-sectional national online survey
BMC Public Health
Association of Schools and Programs of Public Health (ASPPH)
Council on Education for Public Health (CEPH)
Doctor of Public Health (DrPH)
Survey data analysis
Cross-sectional study
DrPH students
title Perspectives on the Doctor of Public Health (DrPH) education among students and alumni in the United States: a cross-sectional national online survey
title_full Perspectives on the Doctor of Public Health (DrPH) education among students and alumni in the United States: a cross-sectional national online survey
title_fullStr Perspectives on the Doctor of Public Health (DrPH) education among students and alumni in the United States: a cross-sectional national online survey
title_full_unstemmed Perspectives on the Doctor of Public Health (DrPH) education among students and alumni in the United States: a cross-sectional national online survey
title_short Perspectives on the Doctor of Public Health (DrPH) education among students and alumni in the United States: a cross-sectional national online survey
title_sort perspectives on the doctor of public health drph education among students and alumni in the united states a cross sectional national online survey
topic Association of Schools and Programs of Public Health (ASPPH)
Council on Education for Public Health (CEPH)
Doctor of Public Health (DrPH)
Survey data analysis
Cross-sectional study
DrPH students
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-16402-3
work_keys_str_mv AT chulwoopark perspectivesonthedoctorofpublichealthdrpheducationamongstudentsandalumniintheunitedstatesacrosssectionalnationalonlinesurvey
AT cindydelgado perspectivesonthedoctorofpublichealthdrpheducationamongstudentsandalumniintheunitedstatesacrosssectionalnationalonlinesurvey
AT ansirfan perspectivesonthedoctorofpublichealthdrpheducationamongstudentsandalumniintheunitedstatesacrosssectionalnationalonlinesurvey