Clinical audit of radiofrequency electrocautery procedure at dermatology department of a tertiary care teaching center

Background: Radiofrequency (RF) surgery is an office-based procedure in the treatment of various skin conditions. It has the advantage of having both cut and coagulation modes, making the surgery easy, fast, effective, and cheaper, and causes minimal collateral thermal damage, resulting in rapid hea...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Dhruv Ramanbhai Patel, Jinal Jainendrabhai Tandel, Juhi Devyangbhai Shah, Rutoo Vipulkumar Polra, Pragya Ashok Nair
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2023-01-01
Series:Clinical Dermatology Review
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.cdriadvlkn.org/article.asp?issn=2542-551X;year=2023;volume=7;issue=4;spage=363;epage=366;aulast=Patel
_version_ 1797352254310711296
author Dhruv Ramanbhai Patel
Jinal Jainendrabhai Tandel
Juhi Devyangbhai Shah
Rutoo Vipulkumar Polra
Pragya Ashok Nair
author_facet Dhruv Ramanbhai Patel
Jinal Jainendrabhai Tandel
Juhi Devyangbhai Shah
Rutoo Vipulkumar Polra
Pragya Ashok Nair
author_sort Dhruv Ramanbhai Patel
collection DOAJ
description Background: Radiofrequency (RF) surgery is an office-based procedure in the treatment of various skin conditions. It has the advantage of having both cut and coagulation modes, making the surgery easy, fast, effective, and cheaper, and causes minimal collateral thermal damage, resulting in rapid healing and esthetically pleasant scars. Objective: The present study was a clinical audit done with the aim to improve the quality of practice for RF electrocautery in the outpatient department (OPD) setup. Materials and Methods: This was a prospective clinical audit of patients coming to skin OPD requiring electrocauterization from August 2019 to October 2019. To assess and monitor the patients going for electrocautery, a pro forma was filled about the indication of electrocautery. Requirements and guidelines followed or not during pre- and postoperative preparation were also tabulated. During the procedure, details such as type of electrode, mode and power of electrocautery, wiping of electrode between each use, continuous activation of foot switch, and waiting period between two passages were also noted. Ratios, proportions, and percentages were used to describe the data. Results: A total of 30 patients were enrolled of which 24 were male (80%) and 6 were female (20%). The most common indication was skin tags seen in 21 participants (70%), followed by warts in 6 (20%) and seborrheic keratosis in 3 (10%) patients. Proper counseling and explanation were done in all the patients (100%). Each cautery was performed with clean surroundings (100%). During the procedure, 24 patients (80%) were given injectable local anesthetics. The electrode used was a long sharp tip electrode in all the procedures and the most common power of instrument used was 0.5 (70%). After each use, wiping of electrode was done in 24 (80%) patients. Three patients were on aspirin (10%) and one had a keloidal tendency (3.33%) which was missed while taking history. Conclusion: Educational interventions among doctors as well as students should be carried out to sensitize them about the standard guidelines of using electrocautery for better results.
first_indexed 2024-03-08T13:12:37Z
format Article
id doaj.art-bf75152ed3cf430591f24722f8154632
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2542-551X
2542-5528
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-08T13:12:37Z
publishDate 2023-01-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
record_format Article
series Clinical Dermatology Review
spelling doaj.art-bf75152ed3cf430591f24722f81546322024-01-18T11:10:27ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsClinical Dermatology Review2542-551X2542-55282023-01-017436336610.4103/cdr.cdr_56_22Clinical audit of radiofrequency electrocautery procedure at dermatology department of a tertiary care teaching centerDhruv Ramanbhai PatelJinal Jainendrabhai TandelJuhi Devyangbhai ShahRutoo Vipulkumar PolraPragya Ashok NairBackground: Radiofrequency (RF) surgery is an office-based procedure in the treatment of various skin conditions. It has the advantage of having both cut and coagulation modes, making the surgery easy, fast, effective, and cheaper, and causes minimal collateral thermal damage, resulting in rapid healing and esthetically pleasant scars. Objective: The present study was a clinical audit done with the aim to improve the quality of practice for RF electrocautery in the outpatient department (OPD) setup. Materials and Methods: This was a prospective clinical audit of patients coming to skin OPD requiring electrocauterization from August 2019 to October 2019. To assess and monitor the patients going for electrocautery, a pro forma was filled about the indication of electrocautery. Requirements and guidelines followed or not during pre- and postoperative preparation were also tabulated. During the procedure, details such as type of electrode, mode and power of electrocautery, wiping of electrode between each use, continuous activation of foot switch, and waiting period between two passages were also noted. Ratios, proportions, and percentages were used to describe the data. Results: A total of 30 patients were enrolled of which 24 were male (80%) and 6 were female (20%). The most common indication was skin tags seen in 21 participants (70%), followed by warts in 6 (20%) and seborrheic keratosis in 3 (10%) patients. Proper counseling and explanation were done in all the patients (100%). Each cautery was performed with clean surroundings (100%). During the procedure, 24 patients (80%) were given injectable local anesthetics. The electrode used was a long sharp tip electrode in all the procedures and the most common power of instrument used was 0.5 (70%). After each use, wiping of electrode was done in 24 (80%) patients. Three patients were on aspirin (10%) and one had a keloidal tendency (3.33%) which was missed while taking history. Conclusion: Educational interventions among doctors as well as students should be carried out to sensitize them about the standard guidelines of using electrocautery for better results.http://www.cdriadvlkn.org/article.asp?issn=2542-551X;year=2023;volume=7;issue=4;spage=363;epage=366;aulast=Patelauditelectric cauteryelectroderadiofrequency
spellingShingle Dhruv Ramanbhai Patel
Jinal Jainendrabhai Tandel
Juhi Devyangbhai Shah
Rutoo Vipulkumar Polra
Pragya Ashok Nair
Clinical audit of radiofrequency electrocautery procedure at dermatology department of a tertiary care teaching center
Clinical Dermatology Review
audit
electric cautery
electrode
radiofrequency
title Clinical audit of radiofrequency electrocautery procedure at dermatology department of a tertiary care teaching center
title_full Clinical audit of radiofrequency electrocautery procedure at dermatology department of a tertiary care teaching center
title_fullStr Clinical audit of radiofrequency electrocautery procedure at dermatology department of a tertiary care teaching center
title_full_unstemmed Clinical audit of radiofrequency electrocautery procedure at dermatology department of a tertiary care teaching center
title_short Clinical audit of radiofrequency electrocautery procedure at dermatology department of a tertiary care teaching center
title_sort clinical audit of radiofrequency electrocautery procedure at dermatology department of a tertiary care teaching center
topic audit
electric cautery
electrode
radiofrequency
url http://www.cdriadvlkn.org/article.asp?issn=2542-551X;year=2023;volume=7;issue=4;spage=363;epage=366;aulast=Patel
work_keys_str_mv AT dhruvramanbhaipatel clinicalauditofradiofrequencyelectrocauteryprocedureatdermatologydepartmentofatertiarycareteachingcenter
AT jinaljainendrabhaitandel clinicalauditofradiofrequencyelectrocauteryprocedureatdermatologydepartmentofatertiarycareteachingcenter
AT juhidevyangbhaishah clinicalauditofradiofrequencyelectrocauteryprocedureatdermatologydepartmentofatertiarycareteachingcenter
AT rutoovipulkumarpolra clinicalauditofradiofrequencyelectrocauteryprocedureatdermatologydepartmentofatertiarycareteachingcenter
AT pragyaashoknair clinicalauditofradiofrequencyelectrocauteryprocedureatdermatologydepartmentofatertiarycareteachingcenter