A Defence of the Traditional Chronology of 542–545, Again
The chronology of the campaigns of the years 542–545 has been the subject of debate, with Michael Whitby defending the traditional interpretation that Procopius’ long account of the bubonic plague concealed the end of the year 542, whereas Geoffrey Greatrex has championed the chronology of Kislinge...
Main Author: | Michael Whitby |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | deu |
Published: |
Ksiegarnia Akademicka Publishing
2023-12-01
|
Series: | Classica Cracoviensia |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://journals.akademicka.pl/cc/article/view/5507 |
Similar Items
-
Reseña de: Rathmann, Michael, <em>Tabula Peutingeriana</em>. Die einzige Weltkarte aus der Antike
by: Manuel Albaladejo Vivero
Published: (2018-11-01) -
O stacjach, zaprzęgach i tajnych agentach, czyli więcej niż kilka zdań na temat najnowszej monografii cursus publicus.
by: Szymon Olszaniec
Published: (2019-09-01) -
Una mutatio de la vía ab Asturica Burdigalam en Mariturri (Vitoria/Álava)
by: Julio Núñez Marcén, et al.
Published: (2005-12-01) -
Roman Campaigns and Negotiations in the East, 542–545
by: Geoffrey Greatrex
Published: (2021-12-01) -
Status identification on the road: requisitioning of travel resources by senators, equestrians, and centurions without diplomata. A note on the Sagalassus inscription (SEG XXVI, 1392)
by: Lukas Lemcke
Published: (2012-05-01)