Effectiveness of eHealth Tools for Hip and Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review

Objective: This study aimed to compare the effectiveness and costs of eHealth tools with usual care in delivering health-related education to patients' undergoing total hip or knee arthroplasty due to osteoarthritis.Data Sources: Six electronic databases were searched to identify randomized con...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Somayyeh Mohammadi, William C. Miller, Julia Wu, Colleen Pawliuk, Julie M. Robillard
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-08-01
Series:Frontiers in Rehabilitation Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fresc.2021.696019/full
_version_ 1797969710061453312
author Somayyeh Mohammadi
Somayyeh Mohammadi
William C. Miller
William C. Miller
Julia Wu
Julia Wu
Colleen Pawliuk
Julie M. Robillard
Julie M. Robillard
author_facet Somayyeh Mohammadi
Somayyeh Mohammadi
William C. Miller
William C. Miller
Julia Wu
Julia Wu
Colleen Pawliuk
Julie M. Robillard
Julie M. Robillard
author_sort Somayyeh Mohammadi
collection DOAJ
description Objective: This study aimed to compare the effectiveness and costs of eHealth tools with usual care in delivering health-related education to patients' undergoing total hip or knee arthroplasty due to osteoarthritis.Data Sources: Six electronic databases were searched to identify randomized controlled trials and experimental designs (randomized or not) examining the effect of eHealth tools on pre- or post-operative care. Only manuscripts written in English were included. In the current study, no specific primary or secondary outcomes were selected. Any study that investigated the impacts of eHealth tools on hip or knee arthroplasty outcomes were included.Review Methods: Two researchers reviewed all titles and abstracts independently and in duplicate. Two researchers also conducted full-text screening and data extraction from the 26 selected articles.Results: The data were descriptively reported, and themes could emerge from each outcome. Two researchers separately assessed the Risk of Bias for each paper using the Cochrane risk of bias assessment tool. The majority of studies evaluated the impact of eHealth tools on physical (n = 23) and psychosocial outcomes (n = 19). Cost-related outcomes were measured in 7 studies. eHealth tools were found to be equivocal to usual care, with few studies reporting statistically significant differences in physical or psychosocial outcome measures. However, cost-related outcomes showed that using eHealth tools is more cost-effective than usual care.Conclusions: This review demonstrated that eHealth tools might be as effective as usual care, and possibly more cost-effective, a crucial implication for many overly burdened health care systems.
first_indexed 2024-04-11T03:06:30Z
format Article
id doaj.art-bfbc1bde1223455cb6a12a2beeadcb56
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2673-6861
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T03:06:30Z
publishDate 2021-08-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Rehabilitation Sciences
spelling doaj.art-bfbc1bde1223455cb6a12a2beeadcb562023-01-02T13:01:15ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Rehabilitation Sciences2673-68612021-08-01210.3389/fresc.2021.696019696019Effectiveness of eHealth Tools for Hip and Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic ReviewSomayyeh Mohammadi0Somayyeh Mohammadi1William C. Miller2William C. Miller3Julia Wu4Julia Wu5Colleen Pawliuk6Julie M. Robillard7Julie M. Robillard8GF Strong Rehabilitation Research Program, Vancouver, BC, CanadaDepartment of Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, CanadaGF Strong Rehabilitation Research Program, Vancouver, BC, CanadaDepartment of Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, CanadaBC Children's and Women's Hospitals and Health Centres, Vancouver, BC, CanadaDivision of Neurology, Department of Medicine, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, CanadaBC Children Hospital Research Institute, Vancouver, BC, CanadaBC Children's and Women's Hospitals and Health Centres, Vancouver, BC, CanadaDivision of Neurology, Department of Medicine, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, CanadaObjective: This study aimed to compare the effectiveness and costs of eHealth tools with usual care in delivering health-related education to patients' undergoing total hip or knee arthroplasty due to osteoarthritis.Data Sources: Six electronic databases were searched to identify randomized controlled trials and experimental designs (randomized or not) examining the effect of eHealth tools on pre- or post-operative care. Only manuscripts written in English were included. In the current study, no specific primary or secondary outcomes were selected. Any study that investigated the impacts of eHealth tools on hip or knee arthroplasty outcomes were included.Review Methods: Two researchers reviewed all titles and abstracts independently and in duplicate. Two researchers also conducted full-text screening and data extraction from the 26 selected articles.Results: The data were descriptively reported, and themes could emerge from each outcome. Two researchers separately assessed the Risk of Bias for each paper using the Cochrane risk of bias assessment tool. The majority of studies evaluated the impact of eHealth tools on physical (n = 23) and psychosocial outcomes (n = 19). Cost-related outcomes were measured in 7 studies. eHealth tools were found to be equivocal to usual care, with few studies reporting statistically significant differences in physical or psychosocial outcome measures. However, cost-related outcomes showed that using eHealth tools is more cost-effective than usual care.Conclusions: This review demonstrated that eHealth tools might be as effective as usual care, and possibly more cost-effective, a crucial implication for many overly burdened health care systems.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fresc.2021.696019/fulleHealthrehabilitationjoint replacement surgeryarthroplastyprehabilitation
spellingShingle Somayyeh Mohammadi
Somayyeh Mohammadi
William C. Miller
William C. Miller
Julia Wu
Julia Wu
Colleen Pawliuk
Julie M. Robillard
Julie M. Robillard
Effectiveness of eHealth Tools for Hip and Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review
Frontiers in Rehabilitation Sciences
eHealth
rehabilitation
joint replacement surgery
arthroplasty
prehabilitation
title Effectiveness of eHealth Tools for Hip and Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review
title_full Effectiveness of eHealth Tools for Hip and Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review
title_fullStr Effectiveness of eHealth Tools for Hip and Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Effectiveness of eHealth Tools for Hip and Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review
title_short Effectiveness of eHealth Tools for Hip and Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review
title_sort effectiveness of ehealth tools for hip and knee arthroplasty a systematic review
topic eHealth
rehabilitation
joint replacement surgery
arthroplasty
prehabilitation
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fresc.2021.696019/full
work_keys_str_mv AT somayyehmohammadi effectivenessofehealthtoolsforhipandkneearthroplastyasystematicreview
AT somayyehmohammadi effectivenessofehealthtoolsforhipandkneearthroplastyasystematicreview
AT williamcmiller effectivenessofehealthtoolsforhipandkneearthroplastyasystematicreview
AT williamcmiller effectivenessofehealthtoolsforhipandkneearthroplastyasystematicreview
AT juliawu effectivenessofehealthtoolsforhipandkneearthroplastyasystematicreview
AT juliawu effectivenessofehealthtoolsforhipandkneearthroplastyasystematicreview
AT colleenpawliuk effectivenessofehealthtoolsforhipandkneearthroplastyasystematicreview
AT juliemrobillard effectivenessofehealthtoolsforhipandkneearthroplastyasystematicreview
AT juliemrobillard effectivenessofehealthtoolsforhipandkneearthroplastyasystematicreview