Identifying Potential Cropland Losses When Conserving 30% and 50% Earth with Different Approaches and Spatial Scales

Biodiversity conservation is the cornerstone for sustainable development. Bold conservation targets provide the last opportunities to halt the human-driven mass extinction. Recently, bold conservation targets have been proposed to protect 30% or 50% of Earth. However, little is known about its poten...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jianqiao Zhao, Yue Cao, Le Yu, Xiaoxuan Liu, Yichuan Shi, Xiaoping Liu, Rui Yang, Peng Gong
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-07-01
Series:Land
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/10/7/704
_version_ 1797526815243239424
author Jianqiao Zhao
Yue Cao
Le Yu
Xiaoxuan Liu
Yichuan Shi
Xiaoping Liu
Rui Yang
Peng Gong
author_facet Jianqiao Zhao
Yue Cao
Le Yu
Xiaoxuan Liu
Yichuan Shi
Xiaoping Liu
Rui Yang
Peng Gong
author_sort Jianqiao Zhao
collection DOAJ
description Biodiversity conservation is the cornerstone for sustainable development. Bold conservation targets provide the last opportunities to halt the human-driven mass extinction. Recently, bold conservation targets have been proposed to protect 30% or 50% of Earth. However, little is known about its potential impacts on cropland. We identify potential cropland losses when 30% and 50% of global terrestrial area is given back to nature by 2030/2050, at three spatial scales (global, biome and country) and using two approaches (“nature-only landscapes” and “shared landscapes”). We find that different targets, applied scales and approaches will lead to different cropland losses: (1) At the global scale, it is possible to protect 50% of the Earth while having minimum cropland losses. (2) At biome scale, 0.64% and 8.54% cropland will be lost globally in 2030 and 2050 under the nature-only approach while by contrast, the shared approach substantially reduces the number of countries confronted by cropland losses, demanding only 0% and 2.59% of global cropland losses in 2030 and 2050. (3) At the national scale, the nature-only approach causes losses of 3.58% and 10.73% of global cropland in 2030 and 2050, while the shared approach requires 0.77% and 7.55% cropland in 2030 and 2050. Our results indicate that bold conservation targets could be considered, especially when adopting the shared approach, and we suggest adopting ambitious targets (protecting at least 30% by 2030) at the UN Biodiversity Conference (COP 15) to ensure a sustainable future for Earth.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T09:34:39Z
format Article
id doaj.art-bfc57032f1a44ef1bb714c42e9c14b56
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2073-445X
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T09:34:39Z
publishDate 2021-07-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Land
spelling doaj.art-bfc57032f1a44ef1bb714c42e9c14b562023-11-22T04:11:28ZengMDPI AGLand2073-445X2021-07-0110770410.3390/land10070704Identifying Potential Cropland Losses When Conserving 30% and 50% Earth with Different Approaches and Spatial ScalesJianqiao Zhao0Yue Cao1Le Yu2Xiaoxuan Liu3Yichuan Shi4Xiaoping Liu5Rui Yang6Peng Gong7Ministry of Education Key Laboratory for Earth System Modeling, Department of Earth System Science, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, ChinaInstitute for National Parks, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, ChinaMinistry of Education Key Laboratory for Earth System Modeling, Department of Earth System Science, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, ChinaMinistry of Education Key Laboratory for Earth System Modeling, Department of Earth System Science, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, ChinaConservation International, Beijing 100027, ChinaGuangdong Key Laboratory for Urbanization and Geo-simulation, School of Geography and Planning, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510275, ChinaInstitute for National Parks, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, ChinaMinistry of Education Key Laboratory for Earth System Modeling, Department of Earth System Science, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, ChinaBiodiversity conservation is the cornerstone for sustainable development. Bold conservation targets provide the last opportunities to halt the human-driven mass extinction. Recently, bold conservation targets have been proposed to protect 30% or 50% of Earth. However, little is known about its potential impacts on cropland. We identify potential cropland losses when 30% and 50% of global terrestrial area is given back to nature by 2030/2050, at three spatial scales (global, biome and country) and using two approaches (“nature-only landscapes” and “shared landscapes”). We find that different targets, applied scales and approaches will lead to different cropland losses: (1) At the global scale, it is possible to protect 50% of the Earth while having minimum cropland losses. (2) At biome scale, 0.64% and 8.54% cropland will be lost globally in 2030 and 2050 under the nature-only approach while by contrast, the shared approach substantially reduces the number of countries confronted by cropland losses, demanding only 0% and 2.59% of global cropland losses in 2030 and 2050. (3) At the national scale, the nature-only approach causes losses of 3.58% and 10.73% of global cropland in 2030 and 2050, while the shared approach requires 0.77% and 7.55% cropland in 2030 and 2050. Our results indicate that bold conservation targets could be considered, especially when adopting the shared approach, and we suggest adopting ambitious targets (protecting at least 30% by 2030) at the UN Biodiversity Conference (COP 15) to ensure a sustainable future for Earth.https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/10/7/704protected areascroplandHalf-Earthbiodiversity conservationfood security
spellingShingle Jianqiao Zhao
Yue Cao
Le Yu
Xiaoxuan Liu
Yichuan Shi
Xiaoping Liu
Rui Yang
Peng Gong
Identifying Potential Cropland Losses When Conserving 30% and 50% Earth with Different Approaches and Spatial Scales
Land
protected areas
cropland
Half-Earth
biodiversity conservation
food security
title Identifying Potential Cropland Losses When Conserving 30% and 50% Earth with Different Approaches and Spatial Scales
title_full Identifying Potential Cropland Losses When Conserving 30% and 50% Earth with Different Approaches and Spatial Scales
title_fullStr Identifying Potential Cropland Losses When Conserving 30% and 50% Earth with Different Approaches and Spatial Scales
title_full_unstemmed Identifying Potential Cropland Losses When Conserving 30% and 50% Earth with Different Approaches and Spatial Scales
title_short Identifying Potential Cropland Losses When Conserving 30% and 50% Earth with Different Approaches and Spatial Scales
title_sort identifying potential cropland losses when conserving 30 and 50 earth with different approaches and spatial scales
topic protected areas
cropland
Half-Earth
biodiversity conservation
food security
url https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/10/7/704
work_keys_str_mv AT jianqiaozhao identifyingpotentialcroplandlosseswhenconserving30and50earthwithdifferentapproachesandspatialscales
AT yuecao identifyingpotentialcroplandlosseswhenconserving30and50earthwithdifferentapproachesandspatialscales
AT leyu identifyingpotentialcroplandlosseswhenconserving30and50earthwithdifferentapproachesandspatialscales
AT xiaoxuanliu identifyingpotentialcroplandlosseswhenconserving30and50earthwithdifferentapproachesandspatialscales
AT yichuanshi identifyingpotentialcroplandlosseswhenconserving30and50earthwithdifferentapproachesandspatialscales
AT xiaopingliu identifyingpotentialcroplandlosseswhenconserving30and50earthwithdifferentapproachesandspatialscales
AT ruiyang identifyingpotentialcroplandlosseswhenconserving30and50earthwithdifferentapproachesandspatialscales
AT penggong identifyingpotentialcroplandlosseswhenconserving30and50earthwithdifferentapproachesandspatialscales