Symbolic and functional brand effects in the hedonic assessment of South African wines

Proceeding from work that identifies price as an extrinsic cue that can mediate between a wine’s perceived and intrinsic merit, the brand construct is presented as an additional potential mediator. Here we define (1) “functional” brands as representations of intrinsic (blind-tasted) quality, and (2)...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: D. Priilaid, P. Van Rensburg
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: AOSIS 2010-09-01
Series:South African Journal of Business Management
Online Access:https://sajbm.org/index.php/sajbm/article/view/524
_version_ 1818149622061727744
author D. Priilaid
P. Van Rensburg
author_facet D. Priilaid
P. Van Rensburg
author_sort D. Priilaid
collection DOAJ
description Proceeding from work that identifies price as an extrinsic cue that can mediate between a wine’s perceived and intrinsic merit, the brand construct is presented as an additional potential mediator. Here we define (1) “functional” brands as representations of intrinsic (blind-tasted) quality, and (2) “symbolic” brands (as proxied by the difference between a wine’s intrinsic and extrinsic (sighted-tasted) evaluations) as placebos. Using a database of 8225 paired tastings (sighted and blind) of popular South African cultivars sampled over an eight year period, we control for contending price and vintage cues to identify the scale, character and distribution of a given set of functional and symbolic brand effects. Respectively these are identified as occurring in the frequency of roughly two-to-one. The 30 strongest of each are tabled. A subset of brands that present simultaneously as both functional and symbolic is further scrutinised. This set decomposes into two distinctive clusters located approximately one standard deviation left and right of the broader intrinsic mean. The smaller Zone of Symbolic Values is characterised by weak intrinsics and strong positive placebos. The second, larger Zone of Functional Values presents the opposite: negative placebos and strong functional intrinsics. Through the calibration and scaling of these brand-effects, wine producers can better understand what proportion of their product’s sight-driven appeal can ably be ascribed to a brand’s placebo as opposed to the underlying quality. Consequently their marketers may now more knowledgably amplify (or, where appropriate, down-play) the label-cue and adjust their wine marketing communication accordingly.
first_indexed 2024-12-11T13:09:57Z
format Article
id doaj.art-bfceb6b1fe6b41298622bc23f8c15565
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2078-5585
2078-5976
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-11T13:09:57Z
publishDate 2010-09-01
publisher AOSIS
record_format Article
series South African Journal of Business Management
spelling doaj.art-bfceb6b1fe6b41298622bc23f8c155652022-12-22T01:06:13ZengAOSISSouth African Journal of Business Management2078-55852078-59762010-09-01413476910.4102/sajbm.v41i3.524249Symbolic and functional brand effects in the hedonic assessment of South African winesD. Priilaid0P. Van Rensburg1School of Management Studies, University of Cape TownSchool of Management Studies, University of Cape TownProceeding from work that identifies price as an extrinsic cue that can mediate between a wine’s perceived and intrinsic merit, the brand construct is presented as an additional potential mediator. Here we define (1) “functional” brands as representations of intrinsic (blind-tasted) quality, and (2) “symbolic” brands (as proxied by the difference between a wine’s intrinsic and extrinsic (sighted-tasted) evaluations) as placebos. Using a database of 8225 paired tastings (sighted and blind) of popular South African cultivars sampled over an eight year period, we control for contending price and vintage cues to identify the scale, character and distribution of a given set of functional and symbolic brand effects. Respectively these are identified as occurring in the frequency of roughly two-to-one. The 30 strongest of each are tabled. A subset of brands that present simultaneously as both functional and symbolic is further scrutinised. This set decomposes into two distinctive clusters located approximately one standard deviation left and right of the broader intrinsic mean. The smaller Zone of Symbolic Values is characterised by weak intrinsics and strong positive placebos. The second, larger Zone of Functional Values presents the opposite: negative placebos and strong functional intrinsics. Through the calibration and scaling of these brand-effects, wine producers can better understand what proportion of their product’s sight-driven appeal can ably be ascribed to a brand’s placebo as opposed to the underlying quality. Consequently their marketers may now more knowledgably amplify (or, where appropriate, down-play) the label-cue and adjust their wine marketing communication accordingly.https://sajbm.org/index.php/sajbm/article/view/524
spellingShingle D. Priilaid
P. Van Rensburg
Symbolic and functional brand effects in the hedonic assessment of South African wines
South African Journal of Business Management
title Symbolic and functional brand effects in the hedonic assessment of South African wines
title_full Symbolic and functional brand effects in the hedonic assessment of South African wines
title_fullStr Symbolic and functional brand effects in the hedonic assessment of South African wines
title_full_unstemmed Symbolic and functional brand effects in the hedonic assessment of South African wines
title_short Symbolic and functional brand effects in the hedonic assessment of South African wines
title_sort symbolic and functional brand effects in the hedonic assessment of south african wines
url https://sajbm.org/index.php/sajbm/article/view/524
work_keys_str_mv AT dpriilaid symbolicandfunctionalbrandeffectsinthehedonicassessmentofsouthafricanwines
AT pvanrensburg symbolicandfunctionalbrandeffectsinthehedonicassessmentofsouthafricanwines