Some Tips on Numerical Modeling of Airflow and Fires in Road Tunnels

The efficiency of tunnels systems is often evaluated using numerical simulations. This concerns both to normal and emergency mode of tunnel systems operation. Therefore the safety level of tunnel users may depend on the quality of numerical models being built. The most often studied areas cover the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Aleksander Król, Małgorzata Król
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-04-01
Series:Energies
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/9/2366
_version_ 1797536804509843456
author Aleksander Król
Małgorzata Król
author_facet Aleksander Król
Małgorzata Król
author_sort Aleksander Król
collection DOAJ
description The efficiency of tunnels systems is often evaluated using numerical simulations. This concerns both to normal and emergency mode of tunnel systems operation. Therefore the safety level of tunnel users may depend on the quality of numerical models being built. The most often studied areas cover the researches on natural and forced airflows in the normal mode and on fire development and smoke spreading in the emergency mode as well as modeling of fan operation. Thus, many software packages implementing Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) are applied here. Despite the available software is recognized as reliable, the problem arises because the built numerical models should be validated at least partially with experimental data. There is a shortage of experimental data from real tunnels due to high costs and many organizational or formal difficulties. Some researchers use data from scaled experiments, but this leads to problems connected with scaling. The paper presents the application of two widely used software packages—Fire Dynamics Simulator (FDS) and ANSYS Fluent to reproduce some scenarios of the operation of a tunnel ventilation system for normal and emergency mode. Most of results were compared with data obtained by own full scale measurements or data available in literature. Some practical issues concerning the application of FDS and ANSYS Fluent were discussed as well.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T12:06:03Z
format Article
id doaj.art-bfd0283ec87948a6b2d8f3da630a3cf0
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1996-1073
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T12:06:03Z
publishDate 2021-04-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Energies
spelling doaj.art-bfd0283ec87948a6b2d8f3da630a3cf02023-11-21T16:37:14ZengMDPI AGEnergies1996-10732021-04-01149236610.3390/en14092366Some Tips on Numerical Modeling of Airflow and Fires in Road TunnelsAleksander Król0Małgorzata Król1Faculty of Transport and Aviation Engineering, Silesian University of Technology, Krasińskiego 8, 40-019 Katowice, PolandFaculty of Energy and Environmental Engineering, Silesian University of Technology, Konarskiego 18, 44-100 Gliwice, PolandThe efficiency of tunnels systems is often evaluated using numerical simulations. This concerns both to normal and emergency mode of tunnel systems operation. Therefore the safety level of tunnel users may depend on the quality of numerical models being built. The most often studied areas cover the researches on natural and forced airflows in the normal mode and on fire development and smoke spreading in the emergency mode as well as modeling of fan operation. Thus, many software packages implementing Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) are applied here. Despite the available software is recognized as reliable, the problem arises because the built numerical models should be validated at least partially with experimental data. There is a shortage of experimental data from real tunnels due to high costs and many organizational or formal difficulties. Some researchers use data from scaled experiments, but this leads to problems connected with scaling. The paper presents the application of two widely used software packages—Fire Dynamics Simulator (FDS) and ANSYS Fluent to reproduce some scenarios of the operation of a tunnel ventilation system for normal and emergency mode. Most of results were compared with data obtained by own full scale measurements or data available in literature. Some practical issues concerning the application of FDS and ANSYS Fluent were discussed as well.https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/9/2366CFDtunnel airflowtunnel firesFDSANSYS Fluent
spellingShingle Aleksander Król
Małgorzata Król
Some Tips on Numerical Modeling of Airflow and Fires in Road Tunnels
Energies
CFD
tunnel airflow
tunnel fires
FDS
ANSYS Fluent
title Some Tips on Numerical Modeling of Airflow and Fires in Road Tunnels
title_full Some Tips on Numerical Modeling of Airflow and Fires in Road Tunnels
title_fullStr Some Tips on Numerical Modeling of Airflow and Fires in Road Tunnels
title_full_unstemmed Some Tips on Numerical Modeling of Airflow and Fires in Road Tunnels
title_short Some Tips on Numerical Modeling of Airflow and Fires in Road Tunnels
title_sort some tips on numerical modeling of airflow and fires in road tunnels
topic CFD
tunnel airflow
tunnel fires
FDS
ANSYS Fluent
url https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/9/2366
work_keys_str_mv AT aleksanderkrol sometipsonnumericalmodelingofairflowandfiresinroadtunnels
AT małgorzatakrol sometipsonnumericalmodelingofairflowandfiresinroadtunnels