Evaluation and performance of a newly developed patient-reported outcome instrument for diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome in a clinical study population

Background: To evaluate the psychometric properties of the newly developed seven-item Irritable Bowel Syndrome – Diarrhea predominant (IBS-D) Daily Symptom Diary and four-item Event Log using phase II clinical trial safety and efficacy data in patients with IBS-D. This instrument measures diarrhea (...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Leticia Delgado-Herrera, Kathryn Lasch, Bernhardt Zeiher, Anthony J. Lembo, Douglas A. Drossman, Benjamin Banderas, Kathleen Rosa, Christopher Lademacher, Rob Arbuckle
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2017-09-01
Series:Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/1756283X17726018
_version_ 1818306938362920960
author Leticia Delgado-Herrera
Kathryn Lasch
Bernhardt Zeiher
Anthony J. Lembo
Douglas A. Drossman
Benjamin Banderas
Kathleen Rosa
Christopher Lademacher
Rob Arbuckle
author_facet Leticia Delgado-Herrera
Kathryn Lasch
Bernhardt Zeiher
Anthony J. Lembo
Douglas A. Drossman
Benjamin Banderas
Kathleen Rosa
Christopher Lademacher
Rob Arbuckle
author_sort Leticia Delgado-Herrera
collection DOAJ
description Background: To evaluate the psychometric properties of the newly developed seven-item Irritable Bowel Syndrome – Diarrhea predominant (IBS-D) Daily Symptom Diary and four-item Event Log using phase II clinical trial safety and efficacy data in patients with IBS-D. This instrument measures diarrhea (stool frequency and stool consistency), abdominal pain related to IBS-D (stomach pain, abdominal pain, abdominal cramps), immediate need to have a bowel movement (immediate need and accident occurrence), bloating, pressure, gas, and incomplete evacuation. Methods: Psychometric properties and responsiveness of the instrument were evaluated in a clinical trial population [ ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01494233]. Results: A total of 434 patients were included in the analyses. Significant differences were found among severity groups ( p < 0.01) defined by IBS Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S) and IBS Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C). Severity scores for each Diary and Event Log item score and five-item, four-item, and three-item summary scores were calculated. Between-group differences in changes over time were significant for all summary scores in groups stratified by changes in PGI-S ( p < 0.05), two of six Diary items, and three of four Event Log items; a one-grade change in PGI-S was considered a meaningful difference with mean change scores on all Diary items −0.13 to −0.86 [standard deviation (SD) 0.79–1.39]. Similarly, for patients who reported being ‘slightly improved’ (considered a clinically meaningful difference) on the PGI-C, mean change scores on Diary items ranged from −0.45 to −1.55 (SD 0.69–1.39). All estimates of clinically important change for each item and all summary scores were small and should be considered preliminary. These results are aligned with the previous standalone psychometric study regarding reliability and validity tests. Conclusions: These analyses provide evidence of the psychometric properties of the IBS-D Daily Symptom Diary and Event Log in a clinical trial population.
first_indexed 2024-12-13T06:50:26Z
format Article
id doaj.art-bfd1101049874f3cba6d93c94820cdff
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1756-283X
1756-2848
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-13T06:50:26Z
publishDate 2017-09-01
publisher SAGE Publishing
record_format Article
series Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology
spelling doaj.art-bfd1101049874f3cba6d93c94820cdff2022-12-21T23:56:10ZengSAGE PublishingTherapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology1756-283X1756-28482017-09-011010.1177/1756283X17726018Evaluation and performance of a newly developed patient-reported outcome instrument for diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome in a clinical study populationLeticia Delgado-HerreraKathryn LaschBernhardt ZeiherAnthony J. LemboDouglas A. DrossmanBenjamin BanderasKathleen RosaChristopher LademacherRob ArbuckleBackground: To evaluate the psychometric properties of the newly developed seven-item Irritable Bowel Syndrome – Diarrhea predominant (IBS-D) Daily Symptom Diary and four-item Event Log using phase II clinical trial safety and efficacy data in patients with IBS-D. This instrument measures diarrhea (stool frequency and stool consistency), abdominal pain related to IBS-D (stomach pain, abdominal pain, abdominal cramps), immediate need to have a bowel movement (immediate need and accident occurrence), bloating, pressure, gas, and incomplete evacuation. Methods: Psychometric properties and responsiveness of the instrument were evaluated in a clinical trial population [ ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01494233]. Results: A total of 434 patients were included in the analyses. Significant differences were found among severity groups ( p < 0.01) defined by IBS Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S) and IBS Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C). Severity scores for each Diary and Event Log item score and five-item, four-item, and three-item summary scores were calculated. Between-group differences in changes over time were significant for all summary scores in groups stratified by changes in PGI-S ( p < 0.05), two of six Diary items, and three of four Event Log items; a one-grade change in PGI-S was considered a meaningful difference with mean change scores on all Diary items −0.13 to −0.86 [standard deviation (SD) 0.79–1.39]. Similarly, for patients who reported being ‘slightly improved’ (considered a clinically meaningful difference) on the PGI-C, mean change scores on Diary items ranged from −0.45 to −1.55 (SD 0.69–1.39). All estimates of clinically important change for each item and all summary scores were small and should be considered preliminary. These results are aligned with the previous standalone psychometric study regarding reliability and validity tests. Conclusions: These analyses provide evidence of the psychometric properties of the IBS-D Daily Symptom Diary and Event Log in a clinical trial population.https://doi.org/10.1177/1756283X17726018
spellingShingle Leticia Delgado-Herrera
Kathryn Lasch
Bernhardt Zeiher
Anthony J. Lembo
Douglas A. Drossman
Benjamin Banderas
Kathleen Rosa
Christopher Lademacher
Rob Arbuckle
Evaluation and performance of a newly developed patient-reported outcome instrument for diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome in a clinical study population
Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology
title Evaluation and performance of a newly developed patient-reported outcome instrument for diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome in a clinical study population
title_full Evaluation and performance of a newly developed patient-reported outcome instrument for diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome in a clinical study population
title_fullStr Evaluation and performance of a newly developed patient-reported outcome instrument for diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome in a clinical study population
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation and performance of a newly developed patient-reported outcome instrument for diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome in a clinical study population
title_short Evaluation and performance of a newly developed patient-reported outcome instrument for diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome in a clinical study population
title_sort evaluation and performance of a newly developed patient reported outcome instrument for diarrhea predominant irritable bowel syndrome in a clinical study population
url https://doi.org/10.1177/1756283X17726018
work_keys_str_mv AT leticiadelgadoherrera evaluationandperformanceofanewlydevelopedpatientreportedoutcomeinstrumentfordiarrheapredominantirritablebowelsyndromeinaclinicalstudypopulation
AT kathrynlasch evaluationandperformanceofanewlydevelopedpatientreportedoutcomeinstrumentfordiarrheapredominantirritablebowelsyndromeinaclinicalstudypopulation
AT bernhardtzeiher evaluationandperformanceofanewlydevelopedpatientreportedoutcomeinstrumentfordiarrheapredominantirritablebowelsyndromeinaclinicalstudypopulation
AT anthonyjlembo evaluationandperformanceofanewlydevelopedpatientreportedoutcomeinstrumentfordiarrheapredominantirritablebowelsyndromeinaclinicalstudypopulation
AT douglasadrossman evaluationandperformanceofanewlydevelopedpatientreportedoutcomeinstrumentfordiarrheapredominantirritablebowelsyndromeinaclinicalstudypopulation
AT benjaminbanderas evaluationandperformanceofanewlydevelopedpatientreportedoutcomeinstrumentfordiarrheapredominantirritablebowelsyndromeinaclinicalstudypopulation
AT kathleenrosa evaluationandperformanceofanewlydevelopedpatientreportedoutcomeinstrumentfordiarrheapredominantirritablebowelsyndromeinaclinicalstudypopulation
AT christopherlademacher evaluationandperformanceofanewlydevelopedpatientreportedoutcomeinstrumentfordiarrheapredominantirritablebowelsyndromeinaclinicalstudypopulation
AT robarbuckle evaluationandperformanceofanewlydevelopedpatientreportedoutcomeinstrumentfordiarrheapredominantirritablebowelsyndromeinaclinicalstudypopulation