Has the Copayment Ceiling Improved Financial Protection in the Korean National Health Insurance System? Evidence From the 2009 Policy Change

Objectives To relieve the financial burden faced by households, the Korean National Health Insurance (NHI) system introduced a “copayment ceiling,” which evolved into a differential ceiling in 2009, with the copayment ceiling depending on patients’ income. This study aimed to examine the effect of t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Tae-Jin Lee, Chelim Cheong
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Korean Society for Preventive Medicine 2017-11-01
Series:Journal of Preventive Medicine and Public Health
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.jpmph.org/upload/pdf/jpmph-50-6-393.pdf
_version_ 1818984123220361216
author Tae-Jin Lee
Chelim Cheong
author_facet Tae-Jin Lee
Chelim Cheong
author_sort Tae-Jin Lee
collection DOAJ
description Objectives To relieve the financial burden faced by households, the Korean National Health Insurance (NHI) system introduced a “copayment ceiling,” which evolved into a differential ceiling in 2009, with the copayment ceiling depending on patients’ income. This study aimed to examine the effect of the differential copayment ceiling on financial protection and healthcare utilization, particularly focusing on whether its effects varied across different income groups. Methods This study obtained data from the Korea Health Panel. The number of households included in the analysis was 6555 in 2008, 5859 in 2009, 5539 in 2010, and 5372 in 2011. To assess the effects of the differential copayment ceiling on utilization, out-of-pocket (OOP) payments, and catastrophic payments, various random-effects models were applied. Utilization was measured as treatment days, while catastrophic payments were defined as OOP payments exceeding 10% of household income. Among the right-hand side variables were the interaction terms of the new policy with income levels, as well as a set of household characteristics. Results The differential copayment ceiling contributed to increased utilization regardless of income levels both in all patients and in cancer patients. However, the new policy did not seem to reduce significantly the incidence of catastrophic payments among cancer patients, and even increased the incidence among all patients. Conclusions The limited effect of the differential ceiling can be attributed to a high proportion of direct payments for services not covered by the NHI, as well as the relatively small number of households benefiting from the differential ceilings; these considerations warrant a better policy design.
first_indexed 2024-12-20T18:14:00Z
format Article
id doaj.art-bfdaf71b5b5b4cfea56aa174ff8b5970
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1975-8375
2233-4521
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-20T18:14:00Z
publishDate 2017-11-01
publisher Korean Society for Preventive Medicine
record_format Article
series Journal of Preventive Medicine and Public Health
spelling doaj.art-bfdaf71b5b5b4cfea56aa174ff8b59702022-12-21T19:30:24ZengKorean Society for Preventive MedicineJournal of Preventive Medicine and Public Health1975-83752233-45212017-11-0150639340010.3961/jpmph.17.1511944Has the Copayment Ceiling Improved Financial Protection in the Korean National Health Insurance System? Evidence From the 2009 Policy ChangeTae-Jin Lee0Chelim Cheong1 Department of Public Health Science, Graduate School of Public Health, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea Institute of Health and Environment, Graduate School of Public Health, Seoul National University, Seoul, KoreaObjectives To relieve the financial burden faced by households, the Korean National Health Insurance (NHI) system introduced a “copayment ceiling,” which evolved into a differential ceiling in 2009, with the copayment ceiling depending on patients’ income. This study aimed to examine the effect of the differential copayment ceiling on financial protection and healthcare utilization, particularly focusing on whether its effects varied across different income groups. Methods This study obtained data from the Korea Health Panel. The number of households included in the analysis was 6555 in 2008, 5859 in 2009, 5539 in 2010, and 5372 in 2011. To assess the effects of the differential copayment ceiling on utilization, out-of-pocket (OOP) payments, and catastrophic payments, various random-effects models were applied. Utilization was measured as treatment days, while catastrophic payments were defined as OOP payments exceeding 10% of household income. Among the right-hand side variables were the interaction terms of the new policy with income levels, as well as a set of household characteristics. Results The differential copayment ceiling contributed to increased utilization regardless of income levels both in all patients and in cancer patients. However, the new policy did not seem to reduce significantly the incidence of catastrophic payments among cancer patients, and even increased the incidence among all patients. Conclusions The limited effect of the differential ceiling can be attributed to a high proportion of direct payments for services not covered by the NHI, as well as the relatively small number of households benefiting from the differential ceilings; these considerations warrant a better policy design.http://www.jpmph.org/upload/pdf/jpmph-50-6-393.pdfHealth insuranceOut-of-pocket paymentsHealth care costsCopayment ceilingFinancial protectionKorea
spellingShingle Tae-Jin Lee
Chelim Cheong
Has the Copayment Ceiling Improved Financial Protection in the Korean National Health Insurance System? Evidence From the 2009 Policy Change
Journal of Preventive Medicine and Public Health
Health insurance
Out-of-pocket payments
Health care costs
Copayment ceiling
Financial protection
Korea
title Has the Copayment Ceiling Improved Financial Protection in the Korean National Health Insurance System? Evidence From the 2009 Policy Change
title_full Has the Copayment Ceiling Improved Financial Protection in the Korean National Health Insurance System? Evidence From the 2009 Policy Change
title_fullStr Has the Copayment Ceiling Improved Financial Protection in the Korean National Health Insurance System? Evidence From the 2009 Policy Change
title_full_unstemmed Has the Copayment Ceiling Improved Financial Protection in the Korean National Health Insurance System? Evidence From the 2009 Policy Change
title_short Has the Copayment Ceiling Improved Financial Protection in the Korean National Health Insurance System? Evidence From the 2009 Policy Change
title_sort has the copayment ceiling improved financial protection in the korean national health insurance system evidence from the 2009 policy change
topic Health insurance
Out-of-pocket payments
Health care costs
Copayment ceiling
Financial protection
Korea
url http://www.jpmph.org/upload/pdf/jpmph-50-6-393.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT taejinlee hasthecopaymentceilingimprovedfinancialprotectioninthekoreannationalhealthinsurancesystemevidencefromthe2009policychange
AT chelimcheong hasthecopaymentceilingimprovedfinancialprotectioninthekoreannationalhealthinsurancesystemevidencefromthe2009policychange