Pouvoirs symboliques des États : souveraineté, territoire, empire

Despite (or perhaps because of) growing recognition of empire’s problematic definition, scholarly interest in the subject has recently revived. Newly opened perspectives notably take in the diverse symbolic powers underpinning state rule : forms of administration, mod...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Florence Alazard, Paul-Alexis Mellet
Format: Article
Language:fra
Published: École Normale Supérieure de Lyon 2012-09-01
Series:Astérion
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journals.openedition.org/asterion/2224
_version_ 1819212104598552576
author Florence Alazard
Paul-Alexis Mellet
author_facet Florence Alazard
Paul-Alexis Mellet
author_sort Florence Alazard
collection DOAJ
description Despite (or perhaps because of) growing recognition of empire’s problematic definition, scholarly interest in the subject has recently revived. Newly opened perspectives notably take in the diverse symbolic powers underpinning state rule : forms of administration, modes of territorial appropriation, degrees of sovereignty, spatial markings of domination, etc. An heuristic model is provided by Charles V’s empire, wherein the emperor rapidly found himself confronted with the challenge of governing distant territories, with different statuses, assembled under the banner of a universal Christian empire.
first_indexed 2024-12-23T06:37:40Z
format Article
id doaj.art-bfe34909a1434820b1a522cc65540781
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1762-6110
language fra
last_indexed 2024-12-23T06:37:40Z
publishDate 2012-09-01
publisher École Normale Supérieure de Lyon
record_format Article
series Astérion
spelling doaj.art-bfe34909a1434820b1a522cc655407812022-12-21T17:56:45ZfraÉcole Normale Supérieure de LyonAstérion1762-61102012-09-011010.4000/asterion.2224Pouvoirs symboliques des États : souveraineté, territoire, empireFlorence AlazardPaul-Alexis MelletDespite (or perhaps because of) growing recognition of empire’s problematic definition, scholarly interest in the subject has recently revived. Newly opened perspectives notably take in the diverse symbolic powers underpinning state rule : forms of administration, modes of territorial appropriation, degrees of sovereignty, spatial markings of domination, etc. An heuristic model is provided by Charles V’s empire, wherein the emperor rapidly found himself confronted with the challenge of governing distant territories, with different statuses, assembled under the banner of a universal Christian empire.http://journals.openedition.org/asterion/2224symbolic powersdominationterritoryempireCharles V
spellingShingle Florence Alazard
Paul-Alexis Mellet
Pouvoirs symboliques des États : souveraineté, territoire, empire
Astérion
symbolic powers
domination
territory
empire
Charles V
title Pouvoirs symboliques des États : souveraineté, territoire, empire
title_full Pouvoirs symboliques des États : souveraineté, territoire, empire
title_fullStr Pouvoirs symboliques des États : souveraineté, territoire, empire
title_full_unstemmed Pouvoirs symboliques des États : souveraineté, territoire, empire
title_short Pouvoirs symboliques des États : souveraineté, territoire, empire
title_sort pouvoirs symboliques des etats souverainete territoire empire
topic symbolic powers
domination
territory
empire
Charles V
url http://journals.openedition.org/asterion/2224
work_keys_str_mv AT florencealazard pouvoirssymboliquesdesetatssouveraineteterritoireempire
AT paulalexismellet pouvoirssymboliquesdesetatssouveraineteterritoireempire