Opening a pharmacy under franchise within the statutory prohibition against pharmacy concentration

This article aims to analyze the current jurisprudence of administrative courts in the context of the statutory prohibition against pharmacy concentration, as referred to in Art. 99 sec. 3 point 2 of the Pharmaceutical Law. Determining the guidelines and principles for interpreting the content of th...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Michał Jachowicz, Michał Kobylarz
Format: Article
Language:Polish
Published: Polish Pharmaceutical Society 2023-10-01
Series:Farmacja Polska
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.ptfarm.pl/download/?file=File%2FFarmacja+Polska%2F2023%2F5%2F02_OG_Otwarcie_apteki_n.pdf
_version_ 1827396777214476288
author Michał Jachowicz
Michał Kobylarz
author_facet Michał Jachowicz
Michał Kobylarz
author_sort Michał Jachowicz
collection DOAJ
description This article aims to analyze the current jurisprudence of administrative courts in the context of the statutory prohibition against pharmacy concentration, as referred to in Art. 99 sec. 3 point 2 of the Pharmaceutical Law. Determining the guidelines and principles for interpreting the content of the prohibition of concentration is crucial for resolving cases before the State Pharmaceutical Inspection authorities regarding the issuance or transfer of permits for operating public pharmacies. In the practical dimension of interpreting the content of the prohibition of pharmacy concentration, the practice of conducting pharmacy activities within a business model shaped and provided by another entrepreneur, i.e. based on a franchising agreement, is particularly relevant. Entering into a franchising agreement, due to its specific provisions, may result in the recognition of dependence of the franchisee on the franchisor in a manner that qualifies the franchisee as a controlled entity. This assessment, in particular, can be derived from the overall legal and factual circumstances arising cumulatively from the provisions of the franchising agreement and other accompanying agreements. It should be emphasized that the mere fact of entering into a franchising agreement does not directly categorize the assessment of the franchisor's acquisition and exercise of control over the franchisee, and thus does not itself justify the conclusion that the franchisee has been deprived of the independence and economic distinctiveness required under Article in Art. 99 sec. 3 point 2-3 of the Pharmaceutical Law , thus becoming a member of the franchisor's capital group or at least its subsidiary. However, such an assessment may be justified by the analysis of the provisions of the franchising agreement, which - due to the unspecified nature of the agreement - remain to a significant extent determined by the will of the parties, which in business terms may often mean a significant influence of the negotiating dominant party, i.e. the franchisor. In addition, the provisions of other agreements concluded between the parties to the franchising agreement may also be relevant to the assessment, creating a scope of obligations somewhat separate, but in essence directly affecting the overall legal situation of the franchisee, including the closer subordination of the franchisee to the influence and rights of the franchisor, and the scope of control exercised by the franchisor.
first_indexed 2024-03-08T18:56:09Z
format Article
id doaj.art-bff28d3f80c4440d8d1114ee03e208a4
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0014-8261
language Polish
last_indexed 2024-03-08T18:56:09Z
publishDate 2023-10-01
publisher Polish Pharmaceutical Society
record_format Article
series Farmacja Polska
spelling doaj.art-bff28d3f80c4440d8d1114ee03e208a42023-12-28T12:27:50ZpolPolish Pharmaceutical SocietyFarmacja Polska0014-82612023-10-0179525926710.32383/farmpol/174069174069Opening a pharmacy under franchise within the statutory prohibition against pharmacy concentrationMichał Jachowicz0https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9864-217XMichał Kobylarz1https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1951-1567Zakład Farmacji Społecznej, Uniwersytet Jagielloński – Collegium Medicum Wydział Farmaceutyczny, PolskaZakład Farmacji Społecznej, Uniwersytet Jagielloński – Collegium Medicum Wydział Farmaceutyczny, PolskaThis article aims to analyze the current jurisprudence of administrative courts in the context of the statutory prohibition against pharmacy concentration, as referred to in Art. 99 sec. 3 point 2 of the Pharmaceutical Law. Determining the guidelines and principles for interpreting the content of the prohibition of concentration is crucial for resolving cases before the State Pharmaceutical Inspection authorities regarding the issuance or transfer of permits for operating public pharmacies. In the practical dimension of interpreting the content of the prohibition of pharmacy concentration, the practice of conducting pharmacy activities within a business model shaped and provided by another entrepreneur, i.e. based on a franchising agreement, is particularly relevant. Entering into a franchising agreement, due to its specific provisions, may result in the recognition of dependence of the franchisee on the franchisor in a manner that qualifies the franchisee as a controlled entity. This assessment, in particular, can be derived from the overall legal and factual circumstances arising cumulatively from the provisions of the franchising agreement and other accompanying agreements. It should be emphasized that the mere fact of entering into a franchising agreement does not directly categorize the assessment of the franchisor's acquisition and exercise of control over the franchisee, and thus does not itself justify the conclusion that the franchisee has been deprived of the independence and economic distinctiveness required under Article in Art. 99 sec. 3 point 2-3 of the Pharmaceutical Law , thus becoming a member of the franchisor's capital group or at least its subsidiary. However, such an assessment may be justified by the analysis of the provisions of the franchising agreement, which - due to the unspecified nature of the agreement - remain to a significant extent determined by the will of the parties, which in business terms may often mean a significant influence of the negotiating dominant party, i.e. the franchisor. In addition, the provisions of other agreements concluded between the parties to the franchising agreement may also be relevant to the assessment, creating a scope of obligations somewhat separate, but in essence directly affecting the overall legal situation of the franchisee, including the closer subordination of the franchisee to the influence and rights of the franchisor, and the scope of control exercised by the franchisor.https://www.ptfarm.pl/download/?file=File%2FFarmacja+Polska%2F2023%2F5%2F02_OG_Otwarcie_apteki_n.pdffranchisingpharmaceutical lawprohibition against pharmacy concentration
spellingShingle Michał Jachowicz
Michał Kobylarz
Opening a pharmacy under franchise within the statutory prohibition against pharmacy concentration
Farmacja Polska
franchising
pharmaceutical law
prohibition against pharmacy concentration
title Opening a pharmacy under franchise within the statutory prohibition against pharmacy concentration
title_full Opening a pharmacy under franchise within the statutory prohibition against pharmacy concentration
title_fullStr Opening a pharmacy under franchise within the statutory prohibition against pharmacy concentration
title_full_unstemmed Opening a pharmacy under franchise within the statutory prohibition against pharmacy concentration
title_short Opening a pharmacy under franchise within the statutory prohibition against pharmacy concentration
title_sort opening a pharmacy under franchise within the statutory prohibition against pharmacy concentration
topic franchising
pharmaceutical law
prohibition against pharmacy concentration
url https://www.ptfarm.pl/download/?file=File%2FFarmacja+Polska%2F2023%2F5%2F02_OG_Otwarcie_apteki_n.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT michałjachowicz openingapharmacyunderfranchisewithinthestatutoryprohibitionagainstpharmacyconcentration
AT michałkobylarz openingapharmacyunderfranchisewithinthestatutoryprohibitionagainstpharmacyconcentration