Results of CHOP chemotherapy for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma

Patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma treated in a University Hospital were studied from 1990 to 2001. Two treatment regimens were used: ProMACE-CytaBOM and then, from November 1996 on, the CHOP regimen. Complete remission (CR), disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS) rates were...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: A.E. Hallack Neto, J. Pereira, B. Beitler, D.A.F. Chamone, P.D. Llacer, F.L. Dulley, M.C.M.A. Macedo, A. Chaoubah
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Associação Brasileira de Divulgação Científica 2006-10-01
Series:Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-879X2006001000007
_version_ 1811210346569924608
author A.E. Hallack Neto
J. Pereira
B. Beitler
D.A.F. Chamone
P.D. Llacer
F.L. Dulley
M.C.M.A. Macedo
A. Chaoubah
author_facet A.E. Hallack Neto
J. Pereira
B. Beitler
D.A.F. Chamone
P.D. Llacer
F.L. Dulley
M.C.M.A. Macedo
A. Chaoubah
author_sort A.E. Hallack Neto
collection DOAJ
description Patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma treated in a University Hospital were studied from 1990 to 2001. Two treatment regimens were used: ProMACE-CytaBOM and then, from November 1996 on, the CHOP regimen. Complete remission (CR), disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS) rates were determined. Primary refractory patients and relapsed patients were also assessed. A total of 111 patients under 60 years of age were assessed and ranked according to the international prognostic index adjusted to age. Twenty (18%) of them were classified as low risk, 40 (36%) as intermediate risk, 33 (29.7%) as high intermediate risk, and 18 (16.3%) as high risk. Over a five-year period, OS and DFS rates were 71 and 59%, respectively, for all patients. For the same time period, OS and DFS rates were 72.8 and 61.3%, respectively, for 77 patients treated with CHOP chemotherapy and 71.3 and 60% for patients treated with the ProMACE-CytaBOM protocol. There was no significant difference in OS or DFS between the two groups. Eleven of 50 refractory and relapsed patients were consolidated with high doses of chemotherapy. Three received allogenic and 8 autologous bone marrow transplantation. For the latter, CR was 62.5% and mean OS was 41.1 months. The clinical behavior, CR, DFS, and OS of the present patients were similar to those reported in the literature. We conclude that both the CHOP and ProMACE-CytaBOM protocols can be used to treat diffuse large B-cell lymphoma patients, although the CHOP protocol is preferable because of its lower cost and lower toxicity.
first_indexed 2024-04-12T04:53:55Z
format Article
id doaj.art-c011c811540449859dc61457bcf33bbb
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0100-879X
1414-431X
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T04:53:55Z
publishDate 2006-10-01
publisher Associação Brasileira de Divulgação Científica
record_format Article
series Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research
spelling doaj.art-c011c811540449859dc61457bcf33bbb2022-12-22T03:47:12ZengAssociação Brasileira de Divulgação CientíficaBrazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research0100-879X1414-431X2006-10-01391013151322Results of CHOP chemotherapy for diffuse large B-cell lymphomaA.E. Hallack NetoJ. PereiraB. BeitlerD.A.F. ChamoneP.D. LlacerF.L. DulleyM.C.M.A. MacedoA. ChaoubahPatients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma treated in a University Hospital were studied from 1990 to 2001. Two treatment regimens were used: ProMACE-CytaBOM and then, from November 1996 on, the CHOP regimen. Complete remission (CR), disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS) rates were determined. Primary refractory patients and relapsed patients were also assessed. A total of 111 patients under 60 years of age were assessed and ranked according to the international prognostic index adjusted to age. Twenty (18%) of them were classified as low risk, 40 (36%) as intermediate risk, 33 (29.7%) as high intermediate risk, and 18 (16.3%) as high risk. Over a five-year period, OS and DFS rates were 71 and 59%, respectively, for all patients. For the same time period, OS and DFS rates were 72.8 and 61.3%, respectively, for 77 patients treated with CHOP chemotherapy and 71.3 and 60% for patients treated with the ProMACE-CytaBOM protocol. There was no significant difference in OS or DFS between the two groups. Eleven of 50 refractory and relapsed patients were consolidated with high doses of chemotherapy. Three received allogenic and 8 autologous bone marrow transplantation. For the latter, CR was 62.5% and mean OS was 41.1 months. The clinical behavior, CR, DFS, and OS of the present patients were similar to those reported in the literature. We conclude that both the CHOP and ProMACE-CytaBOM protocols can be used to treat diffuse large B-cell lymphoma patients, although the CHOP protocol is preferable because of its lower cost and lower toxicity.http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-879X2006001000007Diffuse large B-cell lymphomaCHOP lymphoma treatmentProMACE-CytaBOM treatment
spellingShingle A.E. Hallack Neto
J. Pereira
B. Beitler
D.A.F. Chamone
P.D. Llacer
F.L. Dulley
M.C.M.A. Macedo
A. Chaoubah
Results of CHOP chemotherapy for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma
Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research
Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma
CHOP lymphoma treatment
ProMACE-CytaBOM treatment
title Results of CHOP chemotherapy for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma
title_full Results of CHOP chemotherapy for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma
title_fullStr Results of CHOP chemotherapy for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma
title_full_unstemmed Results of CHOP chemotherapy for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma
title_short Results of CHOP chemotherapy for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma
title_sort results of chop chemotherapy for diffuse large b cell lymphoma
topic Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma
CHOP lymphoma treatment
ProMACE-CytaBOM treatment
url http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-879X2006001000007
work_keys_str_mv AT aehallackneto resultsofchopchemotherapyfordiffuselargebcelllymphoma
AT jpereira resultsofchopchemotherapyfordiffuselargebcelllymphoma
AT bbeitler resultsofchopchemotherapyfordiffuselargebcelllymphoma
AT dafchamone resultsofchopchemotherapyfordiffuselargebcelllymphoma
AT pdllacer resultsofchopchemotherapyfordiffuselargebcelllymphoma
AT fldulley resultsofchopchemotherapyfordiffuselargebcelllymphoma
AT mcmamacedo resultsofchopchemotherapyfordiffuselargebcelllymphoma
AT achaoubah resultsofchopchemotherapyfordiffuselargebcelllymphoma