Ethics of Responsibility and Politics of Religion in the University; Analysis of the Document of the Islamic University

Over the last forty years, experts and researchers examining "impracticability," "immodesty," and "inefficiency" regarding religious policy in universities, have pointed to multiple causes and reasons Current research with respect to the role of the causes and reasons f...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: M.J. Emaeili
Format: Article
Language:fas
Published: Iranian Institute for Social and Cultural Studies 2019-09-01
Series:Taḥqīqāt-i Farhangī-i Īrān
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.jicr.ir/article_406_b417ebf342ec96a71baa09b2d038860a.pdf
_version_ 1826980857080971264
author M.J. Emaeili
author_facet M.J. Emaeili
author_sort M.J. Emaeili
collection DOAJ
description Over the last forty years, experts and researchers examining "impracticability," "immodesty," and "inefficiency" regarding religious policy in universities, have pointed to multiple causes and reasons Current research with respect to the role of the causes and reasons for this are considered Insignificant.  With the help of Weber's theory, the weakness of the "Ethics of responsibility" at the policy institution is brought to light Weber’s theory suggests that there is much suspicion, dissatisfaction, and opposition to Islamization On the other hand, in application to the failures of Islamization of universities in the weakness of morality, the policy of the institution bears responsibility.  The central question this article asks if religion policy in the university is based on the notion of "Responsibility Ethics.”  The author, with the main question and six sub- questions, makes a qualitative analysis of the Document of the Islamic University as approved by the Supreme Council of the Cultural Revolution of 1392 and will show that Religious policy in the university is not based on "Ethics of Responsibility.”  However, this requires another independent review as to whether the document is based on “Ethics of Belief” or not.
first_indexed 2024-04-10T18:42:07Z
format Article
id doaj.art-c01f8d139b2b4717861215df69384531
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2008-1847
2476-5058
language fas
last_indexed 2025-02-18T05:53:13Z
publishDate 2019-09-01
publisher Iranian Institute for Social and Cultural Studies
record_format Article
series Taḥqīqāt-i Farhangī-i Īrān
spelling doaj.art-c01f8d139b2b4717861215df693845312024-11-13T11:17:18ZfasIranian Institute for Social and Cultural StudiesTaḥqīqāt-i Farhangī-i Īrān2008-18472476-50582019-09-011239312110.22035/jicr.2019.2225.2730406Ethics of Responsibility and Politics of Religion in the University; Analysis of the Document of the Islamic UniversityM.J. Emaeili0Assistant Professor of Sociology, Institute for Fundamental Studies of Science and Technology, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, IranOver the last forty years, experts and researchers examining "impracticability," "immodesty," and "inefficiency" regarding religious policy in universities, have pointed to multiple causes and reasons Current research with respect to the role of the causes and reasons for this are considered Insignificant.  With the help of Weber's theory, the weakness of the "Ethics of responsibility" at the policy institution is brought to light Weber’s theory suggests that there is much suspicion, dissatisfaction, and opposition to Islamization On the other hand, in application to the failures of Islamization of universities in the weakness of morality, the policy of the institution bears responsibility.  The central question this article asks if religion policy in the university is based on the notion of "Responsibility Ethics.”  The author, with the main question and six sub- questions, makes a qualitative analysis of the Document of the Islamic University as approved by the Supreme Council of the Cultural Revolution of 1392 and will show that Religious policy in the university is not based on "Ethics of Responsibility.”  However, this requires another independent review as to whether the document is based on “Ethics of Belief” or not.http://www.jicr.ir/article_406_b417ebf342ec96a71baa09b2d038860a.pdfethics of responsibilityweberislamic university documentand religious policy in purpose and meanshybrid form
spellingShingle M.J. Emaeili
Ethics of Responsibility and Politics of Religion in the University; Analysis of the Document of the Islamic University
Taḥqīqāt-i Farhangī-i Īrān
ethics of responsibility
weber
islamic university document
and religious policy in purpose and means
hybrid form
title Ethics of Responsibility and Politics of Religion in the University; Analysis of the Document of the Islamic University
title_full Ethics of Responsibility and Politics of Religion in the University; Analysis of the Document of the Islamic University
title_fullStr Ethics of Responsibility and Politics of Religion in the University; Analysis of the Document of the Islamic University
title_full_unstemmed Ethics of Responsibility and Politics of Religion in the University; Analysis of the Document of the Islamic University
title_short Ethics of Responsibility and Politics of Religion in the University; Analysis of the Document of the Islamic University
title_sort ethics of responsibility and politics of religion in the university analysis of the document of the islamic university
topic ethics of responsibility
weber
islamic university document
and religious policy in purpose and means
hybrid form
url http://www.jicr.ir/article_406_b417ebf342ec96a71baa09b2d038860a.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT mjemaeili ethicsofresponsibilityandpoliticsofreligionintheuniversityanalysisofthedocumentoftheislamicuniversity