Facial Pain: RCT between Conventional Treatment and Fascial Manipulation<sup>®</sup> for Temporomandibular Disorders

Background: To investigate the effectiveness of a specific manual therapy, Fascial Manipulation<sup>®</sup> (FM), in comparison with conventional treatments in temporomandibular disorders (TMD) patients using a two-arm randomized controlled trial. Methods: The study consisted of 28 patie...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Florence Sekito, Marco Pintucci, Carmelo Pirri, Mariana Ribeiro de Moraes Rego, Mayra Cardoso, Kenia Soares Paixão, Valquiria Ribeiro da Silva, Antonio Stecco
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2022-06-01
Series:Bioengineering
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2306-5354/9/7/279
_version_ 1797407458754297856
author Florence Sekito
Marco Pintucci
Carmelo Pirri
Mariana Ribeiro de Moraes Rego
Mayra Cardoso
Kenia Soares Paixão
Valquiria Ribeiro da Silva
Antonio Stecco
author_facet Florence Sekito
Marco Pintucci
Carmelo Pirri
Mariana Ribeiro de Moraes Rego
Mayra Cardoso
Kenia Soares Paixão
Valquiria Ribeiro da Silva
Antonio Stecco
author_sort Florence Sekito
collection DOAJ
description Background: To investigate the effectiveness of a specific manual therapy, Fascial Manipulation<sup>®</sup> (FM), in comparison with conventional treatments in temporomandibular disorders (TMD) patients using a two-arm randomized controlled trial. Methods: The study consisted of 28 patients that were divided in two groups (Group 1: Fascial Manipulation<sup>®</sup> vs. Group 2: conventional TMD treatment). The Verbal Rating Scale (VRS), RDC/TMD, electromyography (EMG) and Pression/Pain Evaluation on Masseter and Temporalis Muscle were assessed with different times. Results: In both groups, the improvement in pain was evident on the VRS scale (<i>p</i> < 0.0001) and pain-free opening (<i>p</i> < 0.001). In Group 1, the recovery of the function was faster; maximum unassisted opening T0 vs. T1 (<i>p</i> = 0.001). Conclusions: FM<sup>®</sup> can be used as an effective method for facial pain, being a rapid, safe and cost-effective approach to reduce pain, gain function and mouth opening that can be used prior to occlusion stabilization appliances.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T03:41:47Z
format Article
id doaj.art-c02237b0dc9e475bab513de851a0bb4b
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2306-5354
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T03:41:47Z
publishDate 2022-06-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Bioengineering
spelling doaj.art-c02237b0dc9e475bab513de851a0bb4b2023-12-03T14:39:32ZengMDPI AGBioengineering2306-53542022-06-019727910.3390/bioengineering9070279Facial Pain: RCT between Conventional Treatment and Fascial Manipulation<sup>®</sup> for Temporomandibular DisordersFlorence Sekito0Marco Pintucci1Carmelo Pirri2Mariana Ribeiro de Moraes Rego3Mayra Cardoso4Kenia Soares Paixão5Valquiria Ribeiro da Silva6Antonio Stecco7Department of Prosthodontic, State University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro 20550-013, BrazilDepartment of Prosthodontic, State University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro 20550-013, BrazilDepartment of Neurosciences, Institute of Human Anatomy, University of Padova, 35121 Padova, ItalyDepartment of Prosthodontic, State University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro 20550-013, BrazilDepartment of Prosthodontic, State University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro 20550-013, BrazilDepartment of Prosthodontic, State University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro 20550-013, BrazilDepartment of Prosthodontic, State University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro 20550-013, BrazilRusk Rehabilitation, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016, USABackground: To investigate the effectiveness of a specific manual therapy, Fascial Manipulation<sup>®</sup> (FM), in comparison with conventional treatments in temporomandibular disorders (TMD) patients using a two-arm randomized controlled trial. Methods: The study consisted of 28 patients that were divided in two groups (Group 1: Fascial Manipulation<sup>®</sup> vs. Group 2: conventional TMD treatment). The Verbal Rating Scale (VRS), RDC/TMD, electromyography (EMG) and Pression/Pain Evaluation on Masseter and Temporalis Muscle were assessed with different times. Results: In both groups, the improvement in pain was evident on the VRS scale (<i>p</i> < 0.0001) and pain-free opening (<i>p</i> < 0.001). In Group 1, the recovery of the function was faster; maximum unassisted opening T0 vs. T1 (<i>p</i> = 0.001). Conclusions: FM<sup>®</sup> can be used as an effective method for facial pain, being a rapid, safe and cost-effective approach to reduce pain, gain function and mouth opening that can be used prior to occlusion stabilization appliances.https://www.mdpi.com/2306-5354/9/7/279Fascial Manipulation<sup>®</sup>odontologyjaw painTMJ disordersfacial painrehabilitation
spellingShingle Florence Sekito
Marco Pintucci
Carmelo Pirri
Mariana Ribeiro de Moraes Rego
Mayra Cardoso
Kenia Soares Paixão
Valquiria Ribeiro da Silva
Antonio Stecco
Facial Pain: RCT between Conventional Treatment and Fascial Manipulation<sup>®</sup> for Temporomandibular Disorders
Bioengineering
Fascial Manipulation<sup>®</sup>
odontology
jaw pain
TMJ disorders
facial pain
rehabilitation
title Facial Pain: RCT between Conventional Treatment and Fascial Manipulation<sup>®</sup> for Temporomandibular Disorders
title_full Facial Pain: RCT between Conventional Treatment and Fascial Manipulation<sup>®</sup> for Temporomandibular Disorders
title_fullStr Facial Pain: RCT between Conventional Treatment and Fascial Manipulation<sup>®</sup> for Temporomandibular Disorders
title_full_unstemmed Facial Pain: RCT between Conventional Treatment and Fascial Manipulation<sup>®</sup> for Temporomandibular Disorders
title_short Facial Pain: RCT between Conventional Treatment and Fascial Manipulation<sup>®</sup> for Temporomandibular Disorders
title_sort facial pain rct between conventional treatment and fascial manipulation sup r sup for temporomandibular disorders
topic Fascial Manipulation<sup>®</sup>
odontology
jaw pain
TMJ disorders
facial pain
rehabilitation
url https://www.mdpi.com/2306-5354/9/7/279
work_keys_str_mv AT florencesekito facialpainrctbetweenconventionaltreatmentandfascialmanipulationsupsupfortemporomandibulardisorders
AT marcopintucci facialpainrctbetweenconventionaltreatmentandfascialmanipulationsupsupfortemporomandibulardisorders
AT carmelopirri facialpainrctbetweenconventionaltreatmentandfascialmanipulationsupsupfortemporomandibulardisorders
AT marianaribeirodemoraesrego facialpainrctbetweenconventionaltreatmentandfascialmanipulationsupsupfortemporomandibulardisorders
AT mayracardoso facialpainrctbetweenconventionaltreatmentandfascialmanipulationsupsupfortemporomandibulardisorders
AT keniasoarespaixao facialpainrctbetweenconventionaltreatmentandfascialmanipulationsupsupfortemporomandibulardisorders
AT valquiriaribeirodasilva facialpainrctbetweenconventionaltreatmentandfascialmanipulationsupsupfortemporomandibulardisorders
AT antoniostecco facialpainrctbetweenconventionaltreatmentandfascialmanipulationsupsupfortemporomandibulardisorders