Facial Pain: RCT between Conventional Treatment and Fascial Manipulation<sup>®</sup> for Temporomandibular Disorders
Background: To investigate the effectiveness of a specific manual therapy, Fascial Manipulation<sup>®</sup> (FM), in comparison with conventional treatments in temporomandibular disorders (TMD) patients using a two-arm randomized controlled trial. Methods: The study consisted of 28 patie...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2022-06-01
|
Series: | Bioengineering |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2306-5354/9/7/279 |
_version_ | 1797407458754297856 |
---|---|
author | Florence Sekito Marco Pintucci Carmelo Pirri Mariana Ribeiro de Moraes Rego Mayra Cardoso Kenia Soares Paixão Valquiria Ribeiro da Silva Antonio Stecco |
author_facet | Florence Sekito Marco Pintucci Carmelo Pirri Mariana Ribeiro de Moraes Rego Mayra Cardoso Kenia Soares Paixão Valquiria Ribeiro da Silva Antonio Stecco |
author_sort | Florence Sekito |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Background: To investigate the effectiveness of a specific manual therapy, Fascial Manipulation<sup>®</sup> (FM), in comparison with conventional treatments in temporomandibular disorders (TMD) patients using a two-arm randomized controlled trial. Methods: The study consisted of 28 patients that were divided in two groups (Group 1: Fascial Manipulation<sup>®</sup> vs. Group 2: conventional TMD treatment). The Verbal Rating Scale (VRS), RDC/TMD, electromyography (EMG) and Pression/Pain Evaluation on Masseter and Temporalis Muscle were assessed with different times. Results: In both groups, the improvement in pain was evident on the VRS scale (<i>p</i> < 0.0001) and pain-free opening (<i>p</i> < 0.001). In Group 1, the recovery of the function was faster; maximum unassisted opening T0 vs. T1 (<i>p</i> = 0.001). Conclusions: FM<sup>®</sup> can be used as an effective method for facial pain, being a rapid, safe and cost-effective approach to reduce pain, gain function and mouth opening that can be used prior to occlusion stabilization appliances. |
first_indexed | 2024-03-09T03:41:47Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-c02237b0dc9e475bab513de851a0bb4b |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2306-5354 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-03-09T03:41:47Z |
publishDate | 2022-06-01 |
publisher | MDPI AG |
record_format | Article |
series | Bioengineering |
spelling | doaj.art-c02237b0dc9e475bab513de851a0bb4b2023-12-03T14:39:32ZengMDPI AGBioengineering2306-53542022-06-019727910.3390/bioengineering9070279Facial Pain: RCT between Conventional Treatment and Fascial Manipulation<sup>®</sup> for Temporomandibular DisordersFlorence Sekito0Marco Pintucci1Carmelo Pirri2Mariana Ribeiro de Moraes Rego3Mayra Cardoso4Kenia Soares Paixão5Valquiria Ribeiro da Silva6Antonio Stecco7Department of Prosthodontic, State University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro 20550-013, BrazilDepartment of Prosthodontic, State University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro 20550-013, BrazilDepartment of Neurosciences, Institute of Human Anatomy, University of Padova, 35121 Padova, ItalyDepartment of Prosthodontic, State University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro 20550-013, BrazilDepartment of Prosthodontic, State University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro 20550-013, BrazilDepartment of Prosthodontic, State University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro 20550-013, BrazilDepartment of Prosthodontic, State University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro 20550-013, BrazilRusk Rehabilitation, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016, USABackground: To investigate the effectiveness of a specific manual therapy, Fascial Manipulation<sup>®</sup> (FM), in comparison with conventional treatments in temporomandibular disorders (TMD) patients using a two-arm randomized controlled trial. Methods: The study consisted of 28 patients that were divided in two groups (Group 1: Fascial Manipulation<sup>®</sup> vs. Group 2: conventional TMD treatment). The Verbal Rating Scale (VRS), RDC/TMD, electromyography (EMG) and Pression/Pain Evaluation on Masseter and Temporalis Muscle were assessed with different times. Results: In both groups, the improvement in pain was evident on the VRS scale (<i>p</i> < 0.0001) and pain-free opening (<i>p</i> < 0.001). In Group 1, the recovery of the function was faster; maximum unassisted opening T0 vs. T1 (<i>p</i> = 0.001). Conclusions: FM<sup>®</sup> can be used as an effective method for facial pain, being a rapid, safe and cost-effective approach to reduce pain, gain function and mouth opening that can be used prior to occlusion stabilization appliances.https://www.mdpi.com/2306-5354/9/7/279Fascial Manipulation<sup>®</sup>odontologyjaw painTMJ disordersfacial painrehabilitation |
spellingShingle | Florence Sekito Marco Pintucci Carmelo Pirri Mariana Ribeiro de Moraes Rego Mayra Cardoso Kenia Soares Paixão Valquiria Ribeiro da Silva Antonio Stecco Facial Pain: RCT between Conventional Treatment and Fascial Manipulation<sup>®</sup> for Temporomandibular Disorders Bioengineering Fascial Manipulation<sup>®</sup> odontology jaw pain TMJ disorders facial pain rehabilitation |
title | Facial Pain: RCT between Conventional Treatment and Fascial Manipulation<sup>®</sup> for Temporomandibular Disorders |
title_full | Facial Pain: RCT between Conventional Treatment and Fascial Manipulation<sup>®</sup> for Temporomandibular Disorders |
title_fullStr | Facial Pain: RCT between Conventional Treatment and Fascial Manipulation<sup>®</sup> for Temporomandibular Disorders |
title_full_unstemmed | Facial Pain: RCT between Conventional Treatment and Fascial Manipulation<sup>®</sup> for Temporomandibular Disorders |
title_short | Facial Pain: RCT between Conventional Treatment and Fascial Manipulation<sup>®</sup> for Temporomandibular Disorders |
title_sort | facial pain rct between conventional treatment and fascial manipulation sup r sup for temporomandibular disorders |
topic | Fascial Manipulation<sup>®</sup> odontology jaw pain TMJ disorders facial pain rehabilitation |
url | https://www.mdpi.com/2306-5354/9/7/279 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT florencesekito facialpainrctbetweenconventionaltreatmentandfascialmanipulationsupsupfortemporomandibulardisorders AT marcopintucci facialpainrctbetweenconventionaltreatmentandfascialmanipulationsupsupfortemporomandibulardisorders AT carmelopirri facialpainrctbetweenconventionaltreatmentandfascialmanipulationsupsupfortemporomandibulardisorders AT marianaribeirodemoraesrego facialpainrctbetweenconventionaltreatmentandfascialmanipulationsupsupfortemporomandibulardisorders AT mayracardoso facialpainrctbetweenconventionaltreatmentandfascialmanipulationsupsupfortemporomandibulardisorders AT keniasoarespaixao facialpainrctbetweenconventionaltreatmentandfascialmanipulationsupsupfortemporomandibulardisorders AT valquiriaribeirodasilva facialpainrctbetweenconventionaltreatmentandfascialmanipulationsupsupfortemporomandibulardisorders AT antoniostecco facialpainrctbetweenconventionaltreatmentandfascialmanipulationsupsupfortemporomandibulardisorders |