Loss of foundation species revisited: conceptual framework with lessons learned from eastern hemlock and whitebark pine

Abstract Ecologists and conservation biologists often prioritize the study of species that are declining, threatened, or endangered over species that are abundant and ecologically important, such as foundation species (FS). Because entire ecosystems and their biodiversity depend on FS, we argue that...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Allyson L. Degrassi, Steven Brantley, Carrie R. Levine, Jacqueline Mohan, Sydne Record, Diana F. Tomback, Aaron M. Ellison
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2019-11-01
Series:Ecosphere
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.2917
_version_ 1818501091066642432
author Allyson L. Degrassi
Steven Brantley
Carrie R. Levine
Jacqueline Mohan
Sydne Record
Diana F. Tomback
Aaron M. Ellison
author_facet Allyson L. Degrassi
Steven Brantley
Carrie R. Levine
Jacqueline Mohan
Sydne Record
Diana F. Tomback
Aaron M. Ellison
author_sort Allyson L. Degrassi
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Ecologists and conservation biologists often prioritize the study of species that are declining, threatened, or endangered over species that are abundant and ecologically important, such as foundation species (FS). Because entire ecosystems and their biodiversity depend on FS, we argue that they have high conservation priority. A citation analysis reveals that FS are studied, but often are characterized ambiguously. More effort is needed to identify FS before they, and the ecosystems they define, are at risk of decline or loss. We suggest a new conceptual framework that includes: informed identification of FS in ecosystems; documentation of ecosystem services provided by FS; a long‐term monitoring strategy to detect threats to FS within specified ecosystems; and, if threats are identified, a comprehensive conservation and adaptive management strategy for FS. We use two widely distributed, rapidly declining North American foundation tree species (Tsuga canadensis [eastern hemlock] and Pinus albicaulis [whitebark pine]) to illustrate this framework. These species exemplify the importance of identifying FS early and conserving or restoring them when they are threatened.
first_indexed 2024-12-10T20:51:28Z
format Article
id doaj.art-c02709193f0e4b2fb8eb46323c3db9ff
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2150-8925
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-10T20:51:28Z
publishDate 2019-11-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Ecosphere
spelling doaj.art-c02709193f0e4b2fb8eb46323c3db9ff2022-12-22T01:34:05ZengWileyEcosphere2150-89252019-11-011011n/an/a10.1002/ecs2.2917Loss of foundation species revisited: conceptual framework with lessons learned from eastern hemlock and whitebark pineAllyson L. Degrassi0Steven Brantley1Carrie R. Levine2Jacqueline Mohan3Sydne Record4Diana F. Tomback5Aaron M. Ellison6Department of Department of Environment and Society Shenandoah University 1460 University Drive Winchester Virginia 22601 USAJoseph W. Jones Ecological Research Center 3988 Jones Center Drive Newton Georgia 39870 USAConservation Science Partners, Inc. 11050 Pioneer Trail, Suite 202 Truckee California 96161 USAOdum School of Ecology University of Georgia Athens 140 E. Green Street Athens Georgia 30602 USADepartment of Biology Bryn Mawr College 101 North Merion Avenue Bryn Mawr Pennsylvania 19010 USADepartment of Integrative Biology, CB 171 University of Colorado Denver P.O. Box 173364 Denver Colorado 80217 USAHarvard Forest Harvard University 324 North Main Street Petersham Massachusetts 01366 USAAbstract Ecologists and conservation biologists often prioritize the study of species that are declining, threatened, or endangered over species that are abundant and ecologically important, such as foundation species (FS). Because entire ecosystems and their biodiversity depend on FS, we argue that they have high conservation priority. A citation analysis reveals that FS are studied, but often are characterized ambiguously. More effort is needed to identify FS before they, and the ecosystems they define, are at risk of decline or loss. We suggest a new conceptual framework that includes: informed identification of FS in ecosystems; documentation of ecosystem services provided by FS; a long‐term monitoring strategy to detect threats to FS within specified ecosystems; and, if threats are identified, a comprehensive conservation and adaptive management strategy for FS. We use two widely distributed, rapidly declining North American foundation tree species (Tsuga canadensis [eastern hemlock] and Pinus albicaulis [whitebark pine]) to illustrate this framework. These species exemplify the importance of identifying FS early and conserving or restoring them when they are threatened.https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.2917citation analysisconceptual conservation frameworkconservationnonnative speciesPinus albicaulisTsuga canadensis
spellingShingle Allyson L. Degrassi
Steven Brantley
Carrie R. Levine
Jacqueline Mohan
Sydne Record
Diana F. Tomback
Aaron M. Ellison
Loss of foundation species revisited: conceptual framework with lessons learned from eastern hemlock and whitebark pine
Ecosphere
citation analysis
conceptual conservation framework
conservation
nonnative species
Pinus albicaulis
Tsuga canadensis
title Loss of foundation species revisited: conceptual framework with lessons learned from eastern hemlock and whitebark pine
title_full Loss of foundation species revisited: conceptual framework with lessons learned from eastern hemlock and whitebark pine
title_fullStr Loss of foundation species revisited: conceptual framework with lessons learned from eastern hemlock and whitebark pine
title_full_unstemmed Loss of foundation species revisited: conceptual framework with lessons learned from eastern hemlock and whitebark pine
title_short Loss of foundation species revisited: conceptual framework with lessons learned from eastern hemlock and whitebark pine
title_sort loss of foundation species revisited conceptual framework with lessons learned from eastern hemlock and whitebark pine
topic citation analysis
conceptual conservation framework
conservation
nonnative species
Pinus albicaulis
Tsuga canadensis
url https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.2917
work_keys_str_mv AT allysonldegrassi lossoffoundationspeciesrevisitedconceptualframeworkwithlessonslearnedfromeasternhemlockandwhitebarkpine
AT stevenbrantley lossoffoundationspeciesrevisitedconceptualframeworkwithlessonslearnedfromeasternhemlockandwhitebarkpine
AT carrierlevine lossoffoundationspeciesrevisitedconceptualframeworkwithlessonslearnedfromeasternhemlockandwhitebarkpine
AT jacquelinemohan lossoffoundationspeciesrevisitedconceptualframeworkwithlessonslearnedfromeasternhemlockandwhitebarkpine
AT sydnerecord lossoffoundationspeciesrevisitedconceptualframeworkwithlessonslearnedfromeasternhemlockandwhitebarkpine
AT dianaftomback lossoffoundationspeciesrevisitedconceptualframeworkwithlessonslearnedfromeasternhemlockandwhitebarkpine
AT aaronmellison lossoffoundationspeciesrevisitedconceptualframeworkwithlessonslearnedfromeasternhemlockandwhitebarkpine