Comparison of the Efficiency of Posterior Intravaginal Sling (PIVS) Procedure in Older and Younger Groups
Introduction: Vaginal vault prolapsus is a challenging problem for the patients and physicians. There may be differences between young and elderly patients in terms of efficiency and safety of surgical procedures. Aim: The aim of our study was to compare the efficiency of the Posterior Intravag...
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
JCDR Research and Publications Private Limited
2016-07-01
|
Series: | Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://jcdr.net/articles/PDF/8104/18360_CE(RA1)_F(T)_PF1(ROAK)_PFA(AK)_PF2(PAG).pdf |
_version_ | 1818519555202351104 |
---|---|
author | Tolgay Tuyan Ilhan AkIn Sivaslioglu Türkan Ilhan Mustafa Gazi Uçar Ismail Dolen |
author_facet | Tolgay Tuyan Ilhan AkIn Sivaslioglu Türkan Ilhan Mustafa Gazi Uçar Ismail Dolen |
author_sort | Tolgay Tuyan Ilhan |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Introduction: Vaginal vault prolapsus is a challenging problem
for the patients and physicians. There may be differences
between young and elderly patients in terms of efficiency and
safety of surgical procedures.
Aim: The aim of our study was to compare the efficiency of
the Posterior Intravaginal Sling (PIVS) procedure in older versus
younger patient groups.
Materials and Methods: A total of 40 patients who underwent
the PIVS procedure were chosen. Twenty of these patients
were younger than 60 years of age (Group I) while the other 20
patients were 60 years of age or older (Group II). Preoperative
Pelvic Organ Prolapsed Quantification (POP-Q) reference
points were compared with postoperative data at the first
year following surgery. Student’s t-test was used to analyse
continuous variables and the χ2
test was used to analyse
categorical data. The Mann–Whitney test was used for data that
were not normally distributed.
Results: Anatomical cure rates were 90 percent in both groups
(p=1.00). There were significantly greater improvements in
POP-Q points in group I than group II.
Conclusion: It could be concluded that PIVS as minimally
invasive procedure for vaginal vault prolapsed and is effective
in all age groups. |
first_indexed | 2024-12-11T01:25:46Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-c034530d96204ebe86e2d99e22ed3707 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2249-782X 0973-709X |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-12-11T01:25:46Z |
publishDate | 2016-07-01 |
publisher | JCDR Research and Publications Private Limited |
record_format | Article |
series | Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research |
spelling | doaj.art-c034530d96204ebe86e2d99e22ed37072022-12-22T01:25:31ZengJCDR Research and Publications Private LimitedJournal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research2249-782X0973-709X2016-07-01107QC05QC0710.7860/JCDR/2016/18360.8104Comparison of the Efficiency of Posterior Intravaginal Sling (PIVS) Procedure in Older and Younger GroupsTolgay Tuyan Ilhan0AkIn Sivaslioglu1Türkan Ilhan2Mustafa Gazi Uçar3Ismail Dolen 4Assistant Professor, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Selcuk University, Konya, Turkey.Associate Professor, Katip Celebi University, Ataturk Training and Research Hospital, Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinics, Izmir, Turkey.Assistant Professor, Beyhekim State Hospital, Konya,Turkey.Assistant Professor, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Selcuk University, Konya, Turkey.Associate Professor, Etlik Zubeyde Hanım Women’s and Maternity Research and Training Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.Introduction: Vaginal vault prolapsus is a challenging problem for the patients and physicians. There may be differences between young and elderly patients in terms of efficiency and safety of surgical procedures. Aim: The aim of our study was to compare the efficiency of the Posterior Intravaginal Sling (PIVS) procedure in older versus younger patient groups. Materials and Methods: A total of 40 patients who underwent the PIVS procedure were chosen. Twenty of these patients were younger than 60 years of age (Group I) while the other 20 patients were 60 years of age or older (Group II). Preoperative Pelvic Organ Prolapsed Quantification (POP-Q) reference points were compared with postoperative data at the first year following surgery. Student’s t-test was used to analyse continuous variables and the χ2 test was used to analyse categorical data. The Mann–Whitney test was used for data that were not normally distributed. Results: Anatomical cure rates were 90 percent in both groups (p=1.00). There were significantly greater improvements in POP-Q points in group I than group II. Conclusion: It could be concluded that PIVS as minimally invasive procedure for vaginal vault prolapsed and is effective in all age groups.https://jcdr.net/articles/PDF/8104/18360_CE(RA1)_F(T)_PF1(ROAK)_PFA(AK)_PF2(PAG).pdfpelvic organ prolapsusrisk factor for recurrence prolapsusvaginal vault prolapsus |
spellingShingle | Tolgay Tuyan Ilhan AkIn Sivaslioglu Türkan Ilhan Mustafa Gazi Uçar Ismail Dolen Comparison of the Efficiency of Posterior Intravaginal Sling (PIVS) Procedure in Older and Younger Groups Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research pelvic organ prolapsus risk factor for recurrence prolapsus vaginal vault prolapsus |
title | Comparison of the Efficiency of Posterior Intravaginal Sling (PIVS) Procedure in Older and Younger Groups |
title_full | Comparison of the Efficiency of Posterior Intravaginal Sling (PIVS) Procedure in Older and Younger Groups |
title_fullStr | Comparison of the Efficiency of Posterior Intravaginal Sling (PIVS) Procedure in Older and Younger Groups |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of the Efficiency of Posterior Intravaginal Sling (PIVS) Procedure in Older and Younger Groups |
title_short | Comparison of the Efficiency of Posterior Intravaginal Sling (PIVS) Procedure in Older and Younger Groups |
title_sort | comparison of the efficiency of posterior intravaginal sling pivs procedure in older and younger groups |
topic | pelvic organ prolapsus risk factor for recurrence prolapsus vaginal vault prolapsus |
url | https://jcdr.net/articles/PDF/8104/18360_CE(RA1)_F(T)_PF1(ROAK)_PFA(AK)_PF2(PAG).pdf |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tolgaytuyanilhan comparisonoftheefficiencyofposteriorintravaginalslingpivsprocedureinolderandyoungergroups AT akinsivaslioglu comparisonoftheefficiencyofposteriorintravaginalslingpivsprocedureinolderandyoungergroups AT turkanilhan comparisonoftheefficiencyofposteriorintravaginalslingpivsprocedureinolderandyoungergroups AT mustafagaziucar comparisonoftheefficiencyofposteriorintravaginalslingpivsprocedureinolderandyoungergroups AT ismaildolen comparisonoftheefficiencyofposteriorintravaginalslingpivsprocedureinolderandyoungergroups |