A review of heterogeneous interpretations of Emotional Reactivity
‘Emotional reactivity’ (ER) is an important construct in the analysis of individual temperamental differences, and has accounted for significant variance in studies with respect to its definition. Between 1920 and 2015, the meaning of ER has varied from physiology of emotional reactions, to stres...
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Centre for Resilience & Socio-Emotional Health
2019-11-01
|
| Series: | International Journal of Emotional Education |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.um.edu.mt/__data/assets/pdf_file/0019/417070/v11i2p5.pdf |
| Summary: | ‘Emotional reactivity’ (ER) is an important construct in the analysis of individual
temperamental differences, and has accounted for significant variance in studies with
respect to its definition. Between 1920 and 2015, the meaning of ER has varied from
physiology of emotional reactions, to stress, depression, and as a sub-type of empathy.
This paper highlights the confusion in the literature about the meaning of ER and raises
questions about the current use of the term ER as a valid construct. It clarifies
heterogeneity within ER through the creation of a framework to explain different
subtypes of ER and suggests new labels designed to help researchers specify the
constructs underpinning the term ER. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2073-7629 2073-7629 |