Managing Free-Range Laying Hens—Part A: Frequent and Non-Frequent Range Users Differ in Laying Performance but Not Egg Quality

Little is known about the impact of ranging on laying performance and egg quality of free-range hens. The aim of this study was to characterise egg production of commercial free-range laying hen sub-populations of low-, moderate- and high-range use at an early age. A total of five flocks with 40,000...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Terence Zimazile Sibanda, Manisha Kolakshyapati, Mitchell Welch, Derek Schneider, Johan Boshoff, Isabelle Ruhnke
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-06-01
Series:Animals
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2615/10/6/991
_version_ 1827715526997049344
author Terence Zimazile Sibanda
Manisha Kolakshyapati
Mitchell Welch
Derek Schneider
Johan Boshoff
Isabelle Ruhnke
author_facet Terence Zimazile Sibanda
Manisha Kolakshyapati
Mitchell Welch
Derek Schneider
Johan Boshoff
Isabelle Ruhnke
author_sort Terence Zimazile Sibanda
collection DOAJ
description Little is known about the impact of ranging on laying performance and egg quality of free-range hens. The aim of this study was to characterise egg production of commercial free-range laying hen sub-populations of low-, moderate- and high-range use at an early age. A total of five flocks with 40,000 hens/flock were investigated where 1875 hens/flock were randomly selected at 16 weeks of age, monitored for their range use and subsequently grouped into “stayers” (the 20% of hens that spent the least time on the range), “roamers” (the 20% of the hens that used the range more than stayers but less than rangers) and “rangers” (the 60% of the hens that spent the most time on the range). Eggs from the individual groups were collected in 10-weekly intervals until hens were 72 weeks of age, commercially graded and tested for several quality parameters. Significant differences were noted for hen-day production. For example, at 22 weeks of age, rangers enjoyed a laying rate of 88.0% ± 1.1%, while stayers performed at 78.2% ± 1.9% but at 72 weeks of age egg production of rangers was 85.1% ± 0.9% and of stayers was 95.5% ± 0.9% (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Range use was of minor importance to the egg quality.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T19:20:12Z
format Article
id doaj.art-c03b3e5000444f55bec3901f8fc33fd4
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2076-2615
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T19:20:12Z
publishDate 2020-06-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Animals
spelling doaj.art-c03b3e5000444f55bec3901f8fc33fd42023-11-20T03:03:25ZengMDPI AGAnimals2076-26152020-06-0110699110.3390/ani10060991Managing Free-Range Laying Hens—Part A: Frequent and Non-Frequent Range Users Differ in Laying Performance but Not Egg QualityTerence Zimazile Sibanda0Manisha Kolakshyapati1Mitchell Welch2Derek Schneider3Johan Boshoff4Isabelle Ruhnke5School of Environmental and Rural Science, Faculty of Science, Agriculture, Business and Law, University of New England, Armidale NSW 2351, AustraliaSchool of Environmental and Rural Science, Faculty of Science, Agriculture, Business and Law, University of New England, Armidale NSW 2351, AustraliaPrecision Agriculture Research Group, Faculty of Science, Agriculture, Business and Law, School of Science and Technology, University of New England, Armidale NSW 2351, AustraliaPrecision Agriculture Research Group, Faculty of Science, Agriculture, Business and Law, School of Science and Technology, University of New England, Armidale NSW 2351, AustraliaComputation, Analytics, Software and Informatics, University of New England, Armidale NSW 2351, AustraliaSchool of Environmental and Rural Science, Faculty of Science, Agriculture, Business and Law, University of New England, Armidale NSW 2351, AustraliaLittle is known about the impact of ranging on laying performance and egg quality of free-range hens. The aim of this study was to characterise egg production of commercial free-range laying hen sub-populations of low-, moderate- and high-range use at an early age. A total of five flocks with 40,000 hens/flock were investigated where 1875 hens/flock were randomly selected at 16 weeks of age, monitored for their range use and subsequently grouped into “stayers” (the 20% of hens that spent the least time on the range), “roamers” (the 20% of the hens that used the range more than stayers but less than rangers) and “rangers” (the 60% of the hens that spent the most time on the range). Eggs from the individual groups were collected in 10-weekly intervals until hens were 72 weeks of age, commercially graded and tested for several quality parameters. Significant differences were noted for hen-day production. For example, at 22 weeks of age, rangers enjoyed a laying rate of 88.0% ± 1.1%, while stayers performed at 78.2% ± 1.9% but at 72 weeks of age egg production of rangers was 85.1% ± 0.9% and of stayers was 95.5% ± 0.9% (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Range use was of minor importance to the egg quality.https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2615/10/6/991behavioureconomicsefficiencyhusbandrymovementnon-caged
spellingShingle Terence Zimazile Sibanda
Manisha Kolakshyapati
Mitchell Welch
Derek Schneider
Johan Boshoff
Isabelle Ruhnke
Managing Free-Range Laying Hens—Part A: Frequent and Non-Frequent Range Users Differ in Laying Performance but Not Egg Quality
Animals
behaviour
economics
efficiency
husbandry
movement
non-caged
title Managing Free-Range Laying Hens—Part A: Frequent and Non-Frequent Range Users Differ in Laying Performance but Not Egg Quality
title_full Managing Free-Range Laying Hens—Part A: Frequent and Non-Frequent Range Users Differ in Laying Performance but Not Egg Quality
title_fullStr Managing Free-Range Laying Hens—Part A: Frequent and Non-Frequent Range Users Differ in Laying Performance but Not Egg Quality
title_full_unstemmed Managing Free-Range Laying Hens—Part A: Frequent and Non-Frequent Range Users Differ in Laying Performance but Not Egg Quality
title_short Managing Free-Range Laying Hens—Part A: Frequent and Non-Frequent Range Users Differ in Laying Performance but Not Egg Quality
title_sort managing free range laying hens part a frequent and non frequent range users differ in laying performance but not egg quality
topic behaviour
economics
efficiency
husbandry
movement
non-caged
url https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2615/10/6/991
work_keys_str_mv AT terencezimazilesibanda managingfreerangelayinghenspartafrequentandnonfrequentrangeusersdifferinlayingperformancebutnoteggquality
AT manishakolakshyapati managingfreerangelayinghenspartafrequentandnonfrequentrangeusersdifferinlayingperformancebutnoteggquality
AT mitchellwelch managingfreerangelayinghenspartafrequentandnonfrequentrangeusersdifferinlayingperformancebutnoteggquality
AT derekschneider managingfreerangelayinghenspartafrequentandnonfrequentrangeusersdifferinlayingperformancebutnoteggquality
AT johanboshoff managingfreerangelayinghenspartafrequentandnonfrequentrangeusersdifferinlayingperformancebutnoteggquality
AT isabelleruhnke managingfreerangelayinghenspartafrequentandnonfrequentrangeusersdifferinlayingperformancebutnoteggquality