Biomechanical Analysis of the Use of Stems in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty

Adequate fixation is fundamental in revision total knee arthroplasty; consequently, surgeons must determine the correct set-up for each patient, choosing from numerous stem solutions. Several designs are currently available on the market, but there are no evidence-based quantitative biomechanical gu...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Bernardo Innocenti, Edoardo Bori, Silvia Pianigiani
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2022-06-01
Series:Bioengineering
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2306-5354/9/6/259
_version_ 1797489891737600000
author Bernardo Innocenti
Edoardo Bori
Silvia Pianigiani
author_facet Bernardo Innocenti
Edoardo Bori
Silvia Pianigiani
author_sort Bernardo Innocenti
collection DOAJ
description Adequate fixation is fundamental in revision total knee arthroplasty; consequently, surgeons must determine the correct set-up for each patient, choosing from numerous stem solutions. Several designs are currently available on the market, but there are no evidence-based quantitative biomechanical guideline yet. Therefore, several stems were designed and analyzed using a previously-validated finite-element model. The following parameters were studied: stem design characteristics (length and shape), added features (straight/bowed stem), fixation technique, and effect of slots/flutes. Bone stress and Risk of Fracture (RF) were analyzed in different regions of interest during a squat (up to 120°). For the femoral stem, the results indicated that all parameters influenced the bone stress distribution. The maximum von Mises stress and RF were always located near the tip of the stem. The long stems generated stress-shielding in the distal bone. Regarding the tibial stem, cemented stems showed lower micromotions at the bone-tibial tray interface and at the stem tip compared to press-fit stems, reducing the risk of implant loosening. The results demonstrated that anatomical shapes and slots reduce bone stress and risk of fracture, whereas flutes have the opposite effect; no relevant differences were found in this regard when alternating cemented and press-fit stem configurations. Cemented tibial stems reduce antero-posterior micromotions, preventing implant loosening.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T00:24:07Z
format Article
id doaj.art-c03dfa49650642d3ab4f1e8624e3df6f
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2306-5354
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T00:24:07Z
publishDate 2022-06-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Bioengineering
spelling doaj.art-c03dfa49650642d3ab4f1e8624e3df6f2023-11-23T15:38:12ZengMDPI AGBioengineering2306-53542022-06-019625910.3390/bioengineering9060259Biomechanical Analysis of the Use of Stems in Revision Total Knee ArthroplastyBernardo Innocenti0Edoardo Bori1Silvia Pianigiani2BEAMS Department, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Av. F. Roosevelt, 50 CP165/56, 1050 Bruxelles, BelgiumBEAMS Department, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Av. F. Roosevelt, 50 CP165/56, 1050 Bruxelles, BelgiumBEAMS Department, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Av. F. Roosevelt, 50 CP165/56, 1050 Bruxelles, BelgiumAdequate fixation is fundamental in revision total knee arthroplasty; consequently, surgeons must determine the correct set-up for each patient, choosing from numerous stem solutions. Several designs are currently available on the market, but there are no evidence-based quantitative biomechanical guideline yet. Therefore, several stems were designed and analyzed using a previously-validated finite-element model. The following parameters were studied: stem design characteristics (length and shape), added features (straight/bowed stem), fixation technique, and effect of slots/flutes. Bone stress and Risk of Fracture (RF) were analyzed in different regions of interest during a squat (up to 120°). For the femoral stem, the results indicated that all parameters influenced the bone stress distribution. The maximum von Mises stress and RF were always located near the tip of the stem. The long stems generated stress-shielding in the distal bone. Regarding the tibial stem, cemented stems showed lower micromotions at the bone-tibial tray interface and at the stem tip compared to press-fit stems, reducing the risk of implant loosening. The results demonstrated that anatomical shapes and slots reduce bone stress and risk of fracture, whereas flutes have the opposite effect; no relevant differences were found in this regard when alternating cemented and press-fit stem configurations. Cemented tibial stems reduce antero-posterior micromotions, preventing implant loosening.https://www.mdpi.com/2306-5354/9/6/259revision TKAstembiomechanicsmicromotionsbone stressrisk of fracture
spellingShingle Bernardo Innocenti
Edoardo Bori
Silvia Pianigiani
Biomechanical Analysis of the Use of Stems in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty
Bioengineering
revision TKA
stem
biomechanics
micromotions
bone stress
risk of fracture
title Biomechanical Analysis of the Use of Stems in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty
title_full Biomechanical Analysis of the Use of Stems in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty
title_fullStr Biomechanical Analysis of the Use of Stems in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty
title_full_unstemmed Biomechanical Analysis of the Use of Stems in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty
title_short Biomechanical Analysis of the Use of Stems in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty
title_sort biomechanical analysis of the use of stems in revision total knee arthroplasty
topic revision TKA
stem
biomechanics
micromotions
bone stress
risk of fracture
url https://www.mdpi.com/2306-5354/9/6/259
work_keys_str_mv AT bernardoinnocenti biomechanicalanalysisoftheuseofstemsinrevisiontotalkneearthroplasty
AT edoardobori biomechanicalanalysisoftheuseofstemsinrevisiontotalkneearthroplasty
AT silviapianigiani biomechanicalanalysisoftheuseofstemsinrevisiontotalkneearthroplasty