When Anger Motivates: Approach States Selectively Influence Running Performance

Emotional states are thought to influence athletic performance. Emotions characterized by high arousal enhance exercise performance. Extant research has focused on the valence and arousal dimensions of emotions, but not whether the motivational dimension (the extent to which the emotion engenders ap...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Grace E. Giles, Carlene A. Horner, Eric Anderson, Grace M. Elliott, Tad T. Brunyé
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-08-01
Series:Frontiers in Psychology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01663/full
_version_ 1818148399679012864
author Grace E. Giles
Grace E. Giles
Carlene A. Horner
Eric Anderson
Eric Anderson
Grace M. Elliott
Tad T. Brunyé
Tad T. Brunyé
author_facet Grace E. Giles
Grace E. Giles
Carlene A. Horner
Eric Anderson
Eric Anderson
Grace M. Elliott
Tad T. Brunyé
Tad T. Brunyé
author_sort Grace E. Giles
collection DOAJ
description Emotional states are thought to influence athletic performance. Emotions characterized by high arousal enhance exercise performance. Extant research has focused on the valence and arousal dimensions of emotions, but not whether the motivational dimension (the extent to which the emotion engenders approach or avoidance behaviors) influences exercise performance. Two studies aimed to determine whether films and music chosen to induce approach- (i.e., anger), avoidance- (i.e., fear), and neutral-oriented emotions would successfully induce their intended emotional states (Study 1) and whether anger and fear emotion inductions would influence 2-mile time trial performance (Study 2). In Study 1, the films and music successfully induced their intended emotions. In Study 2, run time and perceived level of exertion did not differ between emotions across all participants or among faster running participants per a median split. However, among slower running participants, the anger induction increased the 2-mile running speed relative to the neutral induction. These findings suggest that emotions eliciting approach-related motivational states may improve exercise performance, particularly in slower runners.
first_indexed 2024-12-11T12:50:32Z
format Article
id doaj.art-c0466df7fd324e5f8827c55b53d4bd81
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1664-1078
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-11T12:50:32Z
publishDate 2020-08-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Psychology
spelling doaj.art-c0466df7fd324e5f8827c55b53d4bd812022-12-22T01:06:43ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782020-08-011110.3389/fpsyg.2020.01663555302When Anger Motivates: Approach States Selectively Influence Running PerformanceGrace E. Giles0Grace E. Giles1Carlene A. Horner2Eric Anderson3Eric Anderson4Grace M. Elliott5Tad T. Brunyé6Tad T. Brunyé7U.S. Army Combat Capabilities Development Command Soldier Center, Natick, MA, United StatesCenter for Applied Brain and Cognitive Sciences, School of Engineering, Tufts University, Medford, MA, United StatesCenter for Applied Brain and Cognitive Sciences, School of Engineering, Tufts University, Medford, MA, United StatesCenter for Applied Brain and Cognitive Sciences, School of Engineering, Tufts University, Medford, MA, United StatesCenter for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Maine Medical Center Research Institute, Portland, ME, United StatesCenter for Applied Brain and Cognitive Sciences, School of Engineering, Tufts University, Medford, MA, United StatesU.S. Army Combat Capabilities Development Command Soldier Center, Natick, MA, United StatesCenter for Applied Brain and Cognitive Sciences, School of Engineering, Tufts University, Medford, MA, United StatesEmotional states are thought to influence athletic performance. Emotions characterized by high arousal enhance exercise performance. Extant research has focused on the valence and arousal dimensions of emotions, but not whether the motivational dimension (the extent to which the emotion engenders approach or avoidance behaviors) influences exercise performance. Two studies aimed to determine whether films and music chosen to induce approach- (i.e., anger), avoidance- (i.e., fear), and neutral-oriented emotions would successfully induce their intended emotional states (Study 1) and whether anger and fear emotion inductions would influence 2-mile time trial performance (Study 2). In Study 1, the films and music successfully induced their intended emotions. In Study 2, run time and perceived level of exertion did not differ between emotions across all participants or among faster running participants per a median split. However, among slower running participants, the anger induction increased the 2-mile running speed relative to the neutral induction. These findings suggest that emotions eliciting approach-related motivational states may improve exercise performance, particularly in slower runners.https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01663/fullexercisemotivationapproachavoidanceemotion
spellingShingle Grace E. Giles
Grace E. Giles
Carlene A. Horner
Eric Anderson
Eric Anderson
Grace M. Elliott
Tad T. Brunyé
Tad T. Brunyé
When Anger Motivates: Approach States Selectively Influence Running Performance
Frontiers in Psychology
exercise
motivation
approach
avoidance
emotion
title When Anger Motivates: Approach States Selectively Influence Running Performance
title_full When Anger Motivates: Approach States Selectively Influence Running Performance
title_fullStr When Anger Motivates: Approach States Selectively Influence Running Performance
title_full_unstemmed When Anger Motivates: Approach States Selectively Influence Running Performance
title_short When Anger Motivates: Approach States Selectively Influence Running Performance
title_sort when anger motivates approach states selectively influence running performance
topic exercise
motivation
approach
avoidance
emotion
url https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01663/full
work_keys_str_mv AT graceegiles whenangermotivatesapproachstatesselectivelyinfluencerunningperformance
AT graceegiles whenangermotivatesapproachstatesselectivelyinfluencerunningperformance
AT carleneahorner whenangermotivatesapproachstatesselectivelyinfluencerunningperformance
AT ericanderson whenangermotivatesapproachstatesselectivelyinfluencerunningperformance
AT ericanderson whenangermotivatesapproachstatesselectivelyinfluencerunningperformance
AT gracemelliott whenangermotivatesapproachstatesselectivelyinfluencerunningperformance
AT tadtbrunye whenangermotivatesapproachstatesselectivelyinfluencerunningperformance
AT tadtbrunye whenangermotivatesapproachstatesselectivelyinfluencerunningperformance