Community engagement group model in basic and biomedical research: lessons learned from the BEAT-HIV Delaney Collaboratory towards an HIV-1 cure

Abstract Introduction Achieving effective community engagement has been an objective of U.S. National Institutes of Health-funded HIV research efforts, including participation of persons with HIV. Community Advisory Boards (CABs) have remained the predominant model for community engagement since the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Karine Dubé, Beth Peterson, Nora L. Jones, Amy Onorato, William B. Carter, Christine Dannaway, Steven Johnson, Roy Hayes, Marcus Hill, Rease Maddox, James L. Riley, Jane Shull, David Metzger, Luis J. Montaner
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2023-06-01
Series:Research Involvement and Engagement
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s40900-023-00449-y
_version_ 1797806463382454272
author Karine Dubé
Beth Peterson
Nora L. Jones
Amy Onorato
William B. Carter
Christine Dannaway
Steven Johnson
Roy Hayes
Marcus Hill
Rease Maddox
James L. Riley
Jane Shull
David Metzger
Luis J. Montaner
author_facet Karine Dubé
Beth Peterson
Nora L. Jones
Amy Onorato
William B. Carter
Christine Dannaway
Steven Johnson
Roy Hayes
Marcus Hill
Rease Maddox
James L. Riley
Jane Shull
David Metzger
Luis J. Montaner
author_sort Karine Dubé
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Introduction Achieving effective community engagement has been an objective of U.S. National Institutes of Health-funded HIV research efforts, including participation of persons with HIV. Community Advisory Boards (CABs) have remained the predominant model for community engagement since their creation in 1989. As HIV cure-directed research efforts have grown into larger academic-industry partnerships directing resources toward both basic and clinical research under the Martin Delaney Collaboratories (MDC), community input models have also evolved. The BEAT-HIV MDC Collaboratory, based at The Wistar Institute in Philadelphia, United States, implemented a three-part model for community engagement that has shown success in providing greater impact for community engagement across basic, biomedical, and social sciences research efforts. Discussion In this paper, we review the case study of the formation of the BEAT-HIV Community Engagement Group (CEG) model, starting with the historical partnership between The Wistar Institute as a basic research center and Philadelphia FIGHT as a not-for-profit community-based organization (CBO), and culminating with the growth of community engagement under the BEAT-HIV MDC. Second, we present the impact of a cooperative structure including a Community Advisory Board (CAB), CBO, and researchers through the BEAT-HIV CEG model, and highlight collaborative projects that demonstrate the potential strengths, challenges, and opportunities of this model. We also describe challenges and future opportunities for the use of the CEG model. Conclusions Our CEG model integrating a CBO, CAB and scientists could help move us towards the goal of effective, equitable and ethical engagement in HIV cure-directed research. In sharing our lessons learned, challenges and growing pains, we contribute to the science of community engagement into biomedical research efforts with an emphasis on HIV cure-directed research. Our documented experience with implementing the CEG supports greater discussion and independent implementation efforts for this model to engage communities into working teams in a way we find a meaningful, ethical, and sustainable model in support of basic, clinical/biomedical, social sciences and ethics research.
first_indexed 2024-03-13T06:07:42Z
format Article
id doaj.art-c05a97652564407397dcde2189d2a93a
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2056-7529
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-13T06:07:42Z
publishDate 2023-06-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Research Involvement and Engagement
spelling doaj.art-c05a97652564407397dcde2189d2a93a2023-06-11T11:28:11ZengBMCResearch Involvement and Engagement2056-75292023-06-019111710.1186/s40900-023-00449-yCommunity engagement group model in basic and biomedical research: lessons learned from the BEAT-HIV Delaney Collaboratory towards an HIV-1 cureKarine Dubé0Beth Peterson1Nora L. Jones2Amy Onorato3William B. Carter4Christine Dannaway5Steven Johnson6Roy Hayes7Marcus Hill8Rease Maddox9James L. Riley10Jane Shull11David Metzger12Luis J. Montaner13Division of Infectious Diseases and Global Public Health, School of Medicine, University of California San DiegoWistar InstituteBEAT-HIV Delaney Collaboratory Community Advisory Board (CAB)Department of Psychiatry, University of PennsylvaniaBEAT-HIV Delaney Collaboratory Community Advisory Board (CAB)BEAT-HIV Delaney Collaboratory Community Advisory Board (CAB)BEAT-HIV Delaney Collaboratory Community Advisory Board (CAB)BEAT-HIV Delaney Collaboratory Community Advisory Board (CAB)BEAT-HIV Delaney Collaboratory Community Advisory Board (CAB)BEAT-HIV Delaney Collaboratory Community Advisory Board (CAB)Department of Microbiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphia FIGHT Community Health CentersDepartment of Psychiatry, University of PennsylvaniaWistar InstituteAbstract Introduction Achieving effective community engagement has been an objective of U.S. National Institutes of Health-funded HIV research efforts, including participation of persons with HIV. Community Advisory Boards (CABs) have remained the predominant model for community engagement since their creation in 1989. As HIV cure-directed research efforts have grown into larger academic-industry partnerships directing resources toward both basic and clinical research under the Martin Delaney Collaboratories (MDC), community input models have also evolved. The BEAT-HIV MDC Collaboratory, based at The Wistar Institute in Philadelphia, United States, implemented a three-part model for community engagement that has shown success in providing greater impact for community engagement across basic, biomedical, and social sciences research efforts. Discussion In this paper, we review the case study of the formation of the BEAT-HIV Community Engagement Group (CEG) model, starting with the historical partnership between The Wistar Institute as a basic research center and Philadelphia FIGHT as a not-for-profit community-based organization (CBO), and culminating with the growth of community engagement under the BEAT-HIV MDC. Second, we present the impact of a cooperative structure including a Community Advisory Board (CAB), CBO, and researchers through the BEAT-HIV CEG model, and highlight collaborative projects that demonstrate the potential strengths, challenges, and opportunities of this model. We also describe challenges and future opportunities for the use of the CEG model. Conclusions Our CEG model integrating a CBO, CAB and scientists could help move us towards the goal of effective, equitable and ethical engagement in HIV cure-directed research. In sharing our lessons learned, challenges and growing pains, we contribute to the science of community engagement into biomedical research efforts with an emphasis on HIV cure-directed research. Our documented experience with implementing the CEG supports greater discussion and independent implementation efforts for this model to engage communities into working teams in a way we find a meaningful, ethical, and sustainable model in support of basic, clinical/biomedical, social sciences and ethics research.https://doi.org/10.1186/s40900-023-00449-yCommunity engagementPatient and public involvementCommunity advisory boardCommunity-based organizationsAdvocacyHIV cure research
spellingShingle Karine Dubé
Beth Peterson
Nora L. Jones
Amy Onorato
William B. Carter
Christine Dannaway
Steven Johnson
Roy Hayes
Marcus Hill
Rease Maddox
James L. Riley
Jane Shull
David Metzger
Luis J. Montaner
Community engagement group model in basic and biomedical research: lessons learned from the BEAT-HIV Delaney Collaboratory towards an HIV-1 cure
Research Involvement and Engagement
Community engagement
Patient and public involvement
Community advisory board
Community-based organizations
Advocacy
HIV cure research
title Community engagement group model in basic and biomedical research: lessons learned from the BEAT-HIV Delaney Collaboratory towards an HIV-1 cure
title_full Community engagement group model in basic and biomedical research: lessons learned from the BEAT-HIV Delaney Collaboratory towards an HIV-1 cure
title_fullStr Community engagement group model in basic and biomedical research: lessons learned from the BEAT-HIV Delaney Collaboratory towards an HIV-1 cure
title_full_unstemmed Community engagement group model in basic and biomedical research: lessons learned from the BEAT-HIV Delaney Collaboratory towards an HIV-1 cure
title_short Community engagement group model in basic and biomedical research: lessons learned from the BEAT-HIV Delaney Collaboratory towards an HIV-1 cure
title_sort community engagement group model in basic and biomedical research lessons learned from the beat hiv delaney collaboratory towards an hiv 1 cure
topic Community engagement
Patient and public involvement
Community advisory board
Community-based organizations
Advocacy
HIV cure research
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s40900-023-00449-y
work_keys_str_mv AT karinedube communityengagementgroupmodelinbasicandbiomedicalresearchlessonslearnedfromthebeathivdelaneycollaboratorytowardsanhiv1cure
AT bethpeterson communityengagementgroupmodelinbasicandbiomedicalresearchlessonslearnedfromthebeathivdelaneycollaboratorytowardsanhiv1cure
AT noraljones communityengagementgroupmodelinbasicandbiomedicalresearchlessonslearnedfromthebeathivdelaneycollaboratorytowardsanhiv1cure
AT amyonorato communityengagementgroupmodelinbasicandbiomedicalresearchlessonslearnedfromthebeathivdelaneycollaboratorytowardsanhiv1cure
AT williambcarter communityengagementgroupmodelinbasicandbiomedicalresearchlessonslearnedfromthebeathivdelaneycollaboratorytowardsanhiv1cure
AT christinedannaway communityengagementgroupmodelinbasicandbiomedicalresearchlessonslearnedfromthebeathivdelaneycollaboratorytowardsanhiv1cure
AT stevenjohnson communityengagementgroupmodelinbasicandbiomedicalresearchlessonslearnedfromthebeathivdelaneycollaboratorytowardsanhiv1cure
AT royhayes communityengagementgroupmodelinbasicandbiomedicalresearchlessonslearnedfromthebeathivdelaneycollaboratorytowardsanhiv1cure
AT marcushill communityengagementgroupmodelinbasicandbiomedicalresearchlessonslearnedfromthebeathivdelaneycollaboratorytowardsanhiv1cure
AT reasemaddox communityengagementgroupmodelinbasicandbiomedicalresearchlessonslearnedfromthebeathivdelaneycollaboratorytowardsanhiv1cure
AT jameslriley communityengagementgroupmodelinbasicandbiomedicalresearchlessonslearnedfromthebeathivdelaneycollaboratorytowardsanhiv1cure
AT janeshull communityengagementgroupmodelinbasicandbiomedicalresearchlessonslearnedfromthebeathivdelaneycollaboratorytowardsanhiv1cure
AT davidmetzger communityengagementgroupmodelinbasicandbiomedicalresearchlessonslearnedfromthebeathivdelaneycollaboratorytowardsanhiv1cure
AT luisjmontaner communityengagementgroupmodelinbasicandbiomedicalresearchlessonslearnedfromthebeathivdelaneycollaboratorytowardsanhiv1cure