Additional value of cardiac magnetic resonance feature tracking parameters for the evaluation of the arrhythmic risk in patients with mitral valve prolapse

Abstract Objectives The identification of patients with mitral valve prolapse (MVP) presenting high arrhythmic risk remains challenging. Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (CMR) feature tracking (FT) may improve risk stratification. We analyzed the role of CMR-FT parameters in relation to the inciden...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Marco Guglielmo, Dimitri Arangalage, Marco Augusto Bonino, Gianmarco Angelini, Michela Bonanni, Gianluca Pontone, Patrizio Pascale, Laura Anna Leo, Francesco Faletra, Jurg Schwitter, Giovanni Pedrazzini, Pierre Monney, Anna Giulia Pavon
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2023-06-01
Series:Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12968-023-00944-x
Description
Summary:Abstract Objectives The identification of patients with mitral valve prolapse (MVP) presenting high arrhythmic risk remains challenging. Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (CMR) feature tracking (FT) may improve risk stratification. We analyzed the role of CMR-FT parameters in relation to the incidence of complex ventricular arrhythmias (cVA) in patients with MVP and mitral annular disjunction (MAD). Methods 42 patients with MVP and MAD who underwent 1.5 T CMR were classified as MAD-cVA (n = 23, 55%) in case of cVA diagnosed on a 24-h Holter monitoring and as MAD-noVA in the absence of cVA (n = 19, 45%). MAD length, late gadolinium enhancement (LGE), basal segments myocardial extracellular volume (ECV) and CMR-FT were assessed. Results LGE was more frequent in the MAD-cVA group in comparison with the MAD-noVA group (78% vs 42%, p = 0.002) while no difference was observed in terms of basal ECV. Global longitudinal strain (GLS) was reduced in MAD-cVA compared to MAD-noVA (− 18.2% ± 4.6% vs − 25.1% ± 3.1%, p = 0.004) as well as global circumferential strain (GCS) at the mid-ventricular level (− 17.5% ± 4.7% vs − 21.6% ± 3.1%, p = 0.041). Univariate analysis identified as predictors of the incidence of cVA: GCS, circumferential strain (CS) in the basal and mid infero-lateral wall, GLS, regional longitudinal strain (LS) in the basal and mid-ventricular inferolateral wall. Reduced GLS [Odd ratio (OR):1.56 (confidence interval (CI) 95%: 1.45–2.47; p < 0.001)] and regional LS in the basal inferolateral wall [OR: 1.62 (CI 95%: 1.22–2.13; p < 0.001)] remained independent prognostic factors in multivariate analysis. Conclusion In patients with MVP and MAD, CMR-FT parameters are correlated with the incidence of cVA and may be of interest in arrhythmic risk stratification.
ISSN:1532-429X