Clinical application of two-port laparoscopic surgery in sigmoid colon and upper rectal cancer resection
BackgroundIn the field of minimally invasive surgery, the two-port laparoscopic surgery is on the rise. This study investigated the safety and efficacy of two-port laparoscopic surgery (TLS) for resecting sigmoid colon and upper rectal cancers compared with conventional laparoscopic surgery (CLS).Me...
| Main Authors: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2023-11-01
|
| Series: | Frontiers in Oncology |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fonc.2023.1248280/full |
| _version_ | 1797635369589538816 |
|---|---|
| author | Feng Jiang Feng Jiang Mengmeng Ji Mengmeng Ji Fangtong Jin Fangtong Jin Junfeng Liu Junfeng Liu Xiaoping Liu Xiaoping Liu |
| author_facet | Feng Jiang Feng Jiang Mengmeng Ji Mengmeng Ji Fangtong Jin Fangtong Jin Junfeng Liu Junfeng Liu Xiaoping Liu Xiaoping Liu |
| author_sort | Feng Jiang |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | BackgroundIn the field of minimally invasive surgery, the two-port laparoscopic surgery is on the rise. This study investigated the safety and efficacy of two-port laparoscopic surgery (TLS) for resecting sigmoid colon and upper rectal cancers compared with conventional laparoscopic surgery (CLS).MethodsThe clinical data of patients undergoing laparoscopic sigmoid colon cancer and upper rectal cancer resection at the Department of General Surgery of the First Affiliated Hospital of Gannan Medical College between July 2019 and January 2022 were retrospectively collected. Grouped according to different laparoscopic surgery. Based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria,A total of 81 patients were enrolled, of the 25 patients from the TLS group,and of the 56 patients from the CLS group. We mainly compared whether there were statistical differences between the two groups in terms of operative time, intraoperative bleeding, incision length, time to first ambulation, time to first flatus, time to first defecation, postoperative complication rate, and other surgical outcomes.ResultsThere was no statistical difference between the two groups in terms of baseline clinical characteristics (P > 0.05). In terms of the surgical outcomes, there were statistical differences in the total incision length (TLS: 6.21 ± 0.67 cm, CLS: 8.64 ± 1.08 cm, P < 0.001)), time to first ambulation (TLS: 2.0 ± 0.7 d, CLS:3.1 ± 0.9 d, P < 0.001), time to first flatus (TLS: 2.5 ± 0.8 d, CLS: 3.0 ± 0.8 d, P = 0.028), time to first defecation (TLS: 3.8 ± 1.3 d, CLS: 5.1 ± 2.1 d, P = 0.010), and time for liquid diet (TLS: 4.3 ± 1.4 d, CLS: 5.3 ± 1.9 d, P = 0.021). There was no statistical difference between the two groups in terms of the pathology (P > 0.05).ConclusionIn terms of safety, TLS in sigmoid colon and upper rectal cancer resection is comparable to CLS. However, its incision is smaller and more aesthetic, and it causes lesser trauma than CLS. Additionally, it is also superior to CLS in postoperative recovery. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-11T12:20:09Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-c05e76671d4d48e5af42fc05cea057d6 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2234-943X |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-11T12:20:09Z |
| publishDate | 2023-11-01 |
| publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Frontiers in Oncology |
| spelling | doaj.art-c05e76671d4d48e5af42fc05cea057d62023-11-07T03:22:08ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Oncology2234-943X2023-11-011310.3389/fonc.2023.12482801248280Clinical application of two-port laparoscopic surgery in sigmoid colon and upper rectal cancer resectionFeng Jiang0Feng Jiang1Mengmeng Ji2Mengmeng Ji3Fangtong Jin4Fangtong Jin5Junfeng Liu6Junfeng Liu7Xiaoping Liu8Xiaoping Liu9Department of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Gannan Medical University, Ganzhou, ChinaGanzhou City Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Anal Diseases Research, Ganzhou, ChinaDepartment of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Gannan Medical University, Ganzhou, ChinaGanzhou City Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Anal Diseases Research, Ganzhou, ChinaGanzhou City Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Anal Diseases Research, Ganzhou, ChinaGannan Medical University, Ganzhou, ChinaGanzhou City Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Anal Diseases Research, Ganzhou, ChinaGannan Medical University, Ganzhou, ChinaDepartment of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Gannan Medical University, Ganzhou, ChinaGanzhou City Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Anal Diseases Research, Ganzhou, ChinaBackgroundIn the field of minimally invasive surgery, the two-port laparoscopic surgery is on the rise. This study investigated the safety and efficacy of two-port laparoscopic surgery (TLS) for resecting sigmoid colon and upper rectal cancers compared with conventional laparoscopic surgery (CLS).MethodsThe clinical data of patients undergoing laparoscopic sigmoid colon cancer and upper rectal cancer resection at the Department of General Surgery of the First Affiliated Hospital of Gannan Medical College between July 2019 and January 2022 were retrospectively collected. Grouped according to different laparoscopic surgery. Based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria,A total of 81 patients were enrolled, of the 25 patients from the TLS group,and of the 56 patients from the CLS group. We mainly compared whether there were statistical differences between the two groups in terms of operative time, intraoperative bleeding, incision length, time to first ambulation, time to first flatus, time to first defecation, postoperative complication rate, and other surgical outcomes.ResultsThere was no statistical difference between the two groups in terms of baseline clinical characteristics (P > 0.05). In terms of the surgical outcomes, there were statistical differences in the total incision length (TLS: 6.21 ± 0.67 cm, CLS: 8.64 ± 1.08 cm, P < 0.001)), time to first ambulation (TLS: 2.0 ± 0.7 d, CLS:3.1 ± 0.9 d, P < 0.001), time to first flatus (TLS: 2.5 ± 0.8 d, CLS: 3.0 ± 0.8 d, P = 0.028), time to first defecation (TLS: 3.8 ± 1.3 d, CLS: 5.1 ± 2.1 d, P = 0.010), and time for liquid diet (TLS: 4.3 ± 1.4 d, CLS: 5.3 ± 1.9 d, P = 0.021). There was no statistical difference between the two groups in terms of the pathology (P > 0.05).ConclusionIn terms of safety, TLS in sigmoid colon and upper rectal cancer resection is comparable to CLS. However, its incision is smaller and more aesthetic, and it causes lesser trauma than CLS. Additionally, it is also superior to CLS in postoperative recovery.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fonc.2023.1248280/fulltwo-port laparoscopic surgeryconventional laparoscopic surgerysigmoid colon cancerupper rectal cancerclinical application |
| spellingShingle | Feng Jiang Feng Jiang Mengmeng Ji Mengmeng Ji Fangtong Jin Fangtong Jin Junfeng Liu Junfeng Liu Xiaoping Liu Xiaoping Liu Clinical application of two-port laparoscopic surgery in sigmoid colon and upper rectal cancer resection Frontiers in Oncology two-port laparoscopic surgery conventional laparoscopic surgery sigmoid colon cancer upper rectal cancer clinical application |
| title | Clinical application of two-port laparoscopic surgery in sigmoid colon and upper rectal cancer resection |
| title_full | Clinical application of two-port laparoscopic surgery in sigmoid colon and upper rectal cancer resection |
| title_fullStr | Clinical application of two-port laparoscopic surgery in sigmoid colon and upper rectal cancer resection |
| title_full_unstemmed | Clinical application of two-port laparoscopic surgery in sigmoid colon and upper rectal cancer resection |
| title_short | Clinical application of two-port laparoscopic surgery in sigmoid colon and upper rectal cancer resection |
| title_sort | clinical application of two port laparoscopic surgery in sigmoid colon and upper rectal cancer resection |
| topic | two-port laparoscopic surgery conventional laparoscopic surgery sigmoid colon cancer upper rectal cancer clinical application |
| url | https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fonc.2023.1248280/full |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT fengjiang clinicalapplicationoftwoportlaparoscopicsurgeryinsigmoidcolonandupperrectalcancerresection AT fengjiang clinicalapplicationoftwoportlaparoscopicsurgeryinsigmoidcolonandupperrectalcancerresection AT mengmengji clinicalapplicationoftwoportlaparoscopicsurgeryinsigmoidcolonandupperrectalcancerresection AT mengmengji clinicalapplicationoftwoportlaparoscopicsurgeryinsigmoidcolonandupperrectalcancerresection AT fangtongjin clinicalapplicationoftwoportlaparoscopicsurgeryinsigmoidcolonandupperrectalcancerresection AT fangtongjin clinicalapplicationoftwoportlaparoscopicsurgeryinsigmoidcolonandupperrectalcancerresection AT junfengliu clinicalapplicationoftwoportlaparoscopicsurgeryinsigmoidcolonandupperrectalcancerresection AT junfengliu clinicalapplicationoftwoportlaparoscopicsurgeryinsigmoidcolonandupperrectalcancerresection AT xiaopingliu clinicalapplicationoftwoportlaparoscopicsurgeryinsigmoidcolonandupperrectalcancerresection AT xiaopingliu clinicalapplicationoftwoportlaparoscopicsurgeryinsigmoidcolonandupperrectalcancerresection |