Pharmacokinetics and bioequivalence evaluation of omeprazole and sodium bicarbonate dry suspensions in healthy Chinese volunteers

Abstract Omeprazole and sodium bicarbonate dry suspension are effective treatments for acid-related disorders. This study compared the bioequivalence and safety of the two formulations of omeprazole and sodium bicarbonate powder and assessed how CYP2C19 gene polymorphisms affect pharmacokinetics (PK...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rui Zhang, Pengpeng Guo, Jinping Zhou, Peixia Li, Jing Wan, Chunxiao Yang, Jiali Zhou, Yani Liu, Shaojun Shi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Nature Portfolio 2023-01-01
Series:Scientific Reports
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-27286-5
_version_ 1797945972694712320
author Rui Zhang
Pengpeng Guo
Jinping Zhou
Peixia Li
Jing Wan
Chunxiao Yang
Jiali Zhou
Yani Liu
Shaojun Shi
author_facet Rui Zhang
Pengpeng Guo
Jinping Zhou
Peixia Li
Jing Wan
Chunxiao Yang
Jiali Zhou
Yani Liu
Shaojun Shi
author_sort Rui Zhang
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Omeprazole and sodium bicarbonate dry suspension are effective treatments for acid-related disorders. This study compared the bioequivalence and safety of the two formulations of omeprazole and sodium bicarbonate powder and assessed how CYP2C19 gene polymorphisms affect pharmacokinetics (PK). A single-center, randomized, single-dose, 2-sequence and 2-period crossover method was performed in forty healthy Chinese subjects. Blood samples were collected after a single dose for PK (AUC0–∞, AUC0–t, and Cmax) analysis. The concentrations of Omeprazole in human plasma were determined by HPLC–MS/MS. Besides, the gene polymorphisms of CYP2C19 were assessed by Sanger sequencing. The geometric mean ratios (90% confidence interval) [GMR (95% CI)] of Test/Reference preparation for Cmax: 95.2% (88.48%, 102.43%), AUC0–t: 97.47% (94.4%, 101.02%), AUC0–∞: 97.68% (94.27%, 101.21%) were within the range of 80.00–125.00%. The non-parametric test showed no statistical difference in Tmax between the two groups (p > 0.05). All drugs were well tolerated, no severe adverse reactions occurred, and no significant differences in adverse events between the two drugs. For CYP2C19 gene polymorphisms, the results showed that of 40 subjects, 12 subjects were extensive metabolizers, 24 were intermediate metabolizers, and 4 were poor metabolizers, the frequency of metabolic genotypes were 30%, 60%, and 10%. And the allele distributions for CYP2C19 were *1, *2, and *3 at 60%, 38.75%, and 1.25%. Both the CYP2C19 alleles and metabolic genotypes were consistent with other studies in Chinese. The results of PK parameters showed that different genotypes of CYP2C19 lead to significant differences in t1/2, AUC0–t, AUC0–∞ and Cmax, but no significant differences in Tmax in each group. At the same time, we confirmed that the PK parameters of the test and reference had no differences between the males and females. This study has shown that the pharmacokinetic parameters of the two formulations are not significantly different, which showed bioequivalence and exemplary safety. CYP2C19 gene polymorphism significantly differed in the PK parameters of omeprazole sodium bicarbonate powder.
first_indexed 2024-04-10T21:03:30Z
format Article
id doaj.art-c0612ec4a40247c492e6fc52aba60993
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2045-2322
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-10T21:03:30Z
publishDate 2023-01-01
publisher Nature Portfolio
record_format Article
series Scientific Reports
spelling doaj.art-c0612ec4a40247c492e6fc52aba609932023-01-22T12:11:49ZengNature PortfolioScientific Reports2045-23222023-01-0113111010.1038/s41598-022-27286-5Pharmacokinetics and bioequivalence evaluation of omeprazole and sodium bicarbonate dry suspensions in healthy Chinese volunteersRui Zhang0Pengpeng Guo1Jinping Zhou2Peixia Li3Jing Wan4Chunxiao Yang5Jiali Zhou6Yani Liu7Shaojun Shi8Department of Pharmacy, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and TechnologyDepartment of Pharmacy, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and TechnologyDepartment of Pharmacy, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and TechnologyDepartment of Pharmacy, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and TechnologyDepartment of Pharmacy, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and TechnologyDepartment of Pharmacy, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and TechnologyDepartment of Pharmacy, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and TechnologyDepartment of Pharmacy, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and TechnologyDepartment of Pharmacy, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and TechnologyAbstract Omeprazole and sodium bicarbonate dry suspension are effective treatments for acid-related disorders. This study compared the bioequivalence and safety of the two formulations of omeprazole and sodium bicarbonate powder and assessed how CYP2C19 gene polymorphisms affect pharmacokinetics (PK). A single-center, randomized, single-dose, 2-sequence and 2-period crossover method was performed in forty healthy Chinese subjects. Blood samples were collected after a single dose for PK (AUC0–∞, AUC0–t, and Cmax) analysis. The concentrations of Omeprazole in human plasma were determined by HPLC–MS/MS. Besides, the gene polymorphisms of CYP2C19 were assessed by Sanger sequencing. The geometric mean ratios (90% confidence interval) [GMR (95% CI)] of Test/Reference preparation for Cmax: 95.2% (88.48%, 102.43%), AUC0–t: 97.47% (94.4%, 101.02%), AUC0–∞: 97.68% (94.27%, 101.21%) were within the range of 80.00–125.00%. The non-parametric test showed no statistical difference in Tmax between the two groups (p > 0.05). All drugs were well tolerated, no severe adverse reactions occurred, and no significant differences in adverse events between the two drugs. For CYP2C19 gene polymorphisms, the results showed that of 40 subjects, 12 subjects were extensive metabolizers, 24 were intermediate metabolizers, and 4 were poor metabolizers, the frequency of metabolic genotypes were 30%, 60%, and 10%. And the allele distributions for CYP2C19 were *1, *2, and *3 at 60%, 38.75%, and 1.25%. Both the CYP2C19 alleles and metabolic genotypes were consistent with other studies in Chinese. The results of PK parameters showed that different genotypes of CYP2C19 lead to significant differences in t1/2, AUC0–t, AUC0–∞ and Cmax, but no significant differences in Tmax in each group. At the same time, we confirmed that the PK parameters of the test and reference had no differences between the males and females. This study has shown that the pharmacokinetic parameters of the two formulations are not significantly different, which showed bioequivalence and exemplary safety. CYP2C19 gene polymorphism significantly differed in the PK parameters of omeprazole sodium bicarbonate powder.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-27286-5
spellingShingle Rui Zhang
Pengpeng Guo
Jinping Zhou
Peixia Li
Jing Wan
Chunxiao Yang
Jiali Zhou
Yani Liu
Shaojun Shi
Pharmacokinetics and bioequivalence evaluation of omeprazole and sodium bicarbonate dry suspensions in healthy Chinese volunteers
Scientific Reports
title Pharmacokinetics and bioequivalence evaluation of omeprazole and sodium bicarbonate dry suspensions in healthy Chinese volunteers
title_full Pharmacokinetics and bioequivalence evaluation of omeprazole and sodium bicarbonate dry suspensions in healthy Chinese volunteers
title_fullStr Pharmacokinetics and bioequivalence evaluation of omeprazole and sodium bicarbonate dry suspensions in healthy Chinese volunteers
title_full_unstemmed Pharmacokinetics and bioequivalence evaluation of omeprazole and sodium bicarbonate dry suspensions in healthy Chinese volunteers
title_short Pharmacokinetics and bioequivalence evaluation of omeprazole and sodium bicarbonate dry suspensions in healthy Chinese volunteers
title_sort pharmacokinetics and bioequivalence evaluation of omeprazole and sodium bicarbonate dry suspensions in healthy chinese volunteers
url https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-27286-5
work_keys_str_mv AT ruizhang pharmacokineticsandbioequivalenceevaluationofomeprazoleandsodiumbicarbonatedrysuspensionsinhealthychinesevolunteers
AT pengpengguo pharmacokineticsandbioequivalenceevaluationofomeprazoleandsodiumbicarbonatedrysuspensionsinhealthychinesevolunteers
AT jinpingzhou pharmacokineticsandbioequivalenceevaluationofomeprazoleandsodiumbicarbonatedrysuspensionsinhealthychinesevolunteers
AT peixiali pharmacokineticsandbioequivalenceevaluationofomeprazoleandsodiumbicarbonatedrysuspensionsinhealthychinesevolunteers
AT jingwan pharmacokineticsandbioequivalenceevaluationofomeprazoleandsodiumbicarbonatedrysuspensionsinhealthychinesevolunteers
AT chunxiaoyang pharmacokineticsandbioequivalenceevaluationofomeprazoleandsodiumbicarbonatedrysuspensionsinhealthychinesevolunteers
AT jializhou pharmacokineticsandbioequivalenceevaluationofomeprazoleandsodiumbicarbonatedrysuspensionsinhealthychinesevolunteers
AT yaniliu pharmacokineticsandbioequivalenceevaluationofomeprazoleandsodiumbicarbonatedrysuspensionsinhealthychinesevolunteers
AT shaojunshi pharmacokineticsandbioequivalenceevaluationofomeprazoleandsodiumbicarbonatedrysuspensionsinhealthychinesevolunteers