Evaluation of Airway Measurements in Class II Patients Following Functional Treatment

Objective:This study aimed to evaluate the effect of fixed and removable functional treatment on pharyngeal airway measurements in class II patients.Methods:In this study, patients treated with fixed (Forsus Fatigue Resistant Device-FRD) and removable (twin-block-TWB) appliances were included (n=15,...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Merve Göymen, Dler Mourad, Ayşegül Güleç
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Galenos Yayinevi 2019-03-01
Series:Turkish Journal of Orthodontics
Subjects:
Online Access: http://www.turkjorthod.org/archives/archive-detail/article-preview/evaluation-of-airway-measurements-in-class--patien/53438
_version_ 1797767486420025344
author Merve Göymen
Dler Mourad
Ayşegül Güleç
author_facet Merve Göymen
Dler Mourad
Ayşegül Güleç
author_sort Merve Göymen
collection DOAJ
description Objective:This study aimed to evaluate the effect of fixed and removable functional treatment on pharyngeal airway measurements in class II patients.Methods:In this study, patients treated with fixed (Forsus Fatigue Resistant Device-FRD) and removable (twin-block-TWB) appliances were included (n=15, eight females, seven males in each group). These groups were compared with untreated individuals as the control group (n=10). The mean age of individuals was 13.22±2.39 years. Initial and post-treatment cephalometric radiographs were digitized, and the sagittal pharyngeal airway changes were evaluated. The pharyngeal airway was divided into the nasopharynx, oropharynx, and hypopharynx. The one-way ANOVA, Kruskal-Wallis test, and paired samples t-test were used for statistical analyses.Results:At the initial values, no statistically significant difference was observed between the groups. Only the ANB values differed between the groups (p<0.05). Although the skeletal effects of removable and fixed treatment were not exactly the same, the changes of the airway dimensions were similar.Conclusion:The TWB and FRD appliances lead to an increase in nasopharynx, oropharynx, and hypopharynx sagittal dimensions. However, in terms of the effect on airway sagittal dimensions, there was no significant difference between treatment groups and the control group.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T20:39:50Z
format Article
id doaj.art-c06f2ca298b84d5e93fa2424758d63fd
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2528-9659
2148-9505
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T20:39:50Z
publishDate 2019-03-01
publisher Galenos Yayinevi
record_format Article
series Turkish Journal of Orthodontics
spelling doaj.art-c06f2ca298b84d5e93fa2424758d63fd2023-08-01T11:03:44ZengGalenos YayineviTurkish Journal of Orthodontics2528-96592148-95052019-03-0132161010.5152/TurkJOrthod.2019.1805013049054Evaluation of Airway Measurements in Class II Patients Following Functional TreatmentMerve Göymen0Dler Mourad1Ayşegül Güleç2 Department of Orthodontics, Gaziantep University School of Dentistry, Gaziantep, Turkey Department of Orthodontics, Gaziantep University School of Dentistry, Gaziantep, Turkey Department of Orthodontics, Gaziantep University School of Dentistry, Gaziantep, Turkey Objective:This study aimed to evaluate the effect of fixed and removable functional treatment on pharyngeal airway measurements in class II patients.Methods:In this study, patients treated with fixed (Forsus Fatigue Resistant Device-FRD) and removable (twin-block-TWB) appliances were included (n=15, eight females, seven males in each group). These groups were compared with untreated individuals as the control group (n=10). The mean age of individuals was 13.22±2.39 years. Initial and post-treatment cephalometric radiographs were digitized, and the sagittal pharyngeal airway changes were evaluated. The pharyngeal airway was divided into the nasopharynx, oropharynx, and hypopharynx. The one-way ANOVA, Kruskal-Wallis test, and paired samples t-test were used for statistical analyses.Results:At the initial values, no statistically significant difference was observed between the groups. Only the ANB values differed between the groups (p<0.05). Although the skeletal effects of removable and fixed treatment were not exactly the same, the changes of the airway dimensions were similar.Conclusion:The TWB and FRD appliances lead to an increase in nasopharynx, oropharynx, and hypopharynx sagittal dimensions. However, in terms of the effect on airway sagittal dimensions, there was no significant difference between treatment groups and the control group. http://www.turkjorthod.org/archives/archive-detail/article-preview/evaluation-of-airway-measurements-in-class--patien/53438 functional treatmentairwaycephalometricstwin-blockforsus
spellingShingle Merve Göymen
Dler Mourad
Ayşegül Güleç
Evaluation of Airway Measurements in Class II Patients Following Functional Treatment
Turkish Journal of Orthodontics
functional treatment
airway
cephalometrics
twin-block
forsus
title Evaluation of Airway Measurements in Class II Patients Following Functional Treatment
title_full Evaluation of Airway Measurements in Class II Patients Following Functional Treatment
title_fullStr Evaluation of Airway Measurements in Class II Patients Following Functional Treatment
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Airway Measurements in Class II Patients Following Functional Treatment
title_short Evaluation of Airway Measurements in Class II Patients Following Functional Treatment
title_sort evaluation of airway measurements in class ii patients following functional treatment
topic functional treatment
airway
cephalometrics
twin-block
forsus
url http://www.turkjorthod.org/archives/archive-detail/article-preview/evaluation-of-airway-measurements-in-class--patien/53438
work_keys_str_mv AT mervegoymen evaluationofairwaymeasurementsinclassiipatientsfollowingfunctionaltreatment
AT dlermourad evaluationofairwaymeasurementsinclassiipatientsfollowingfunctionaltreatment
AT aysegulgulec evaluationofairwaymeasurementsinclassiipatientsfollowingfunctionaltreatment