Evaluation of land surface model simulations of evapotranspiration over a 12-year crop succession: impact of soil hydraulic and vegetation properties

Evapotranspiration has been recognized as one of the most uncertain terms in the surface water balance simulated by land surface models. In this study, the SURFEX/ISBA-A-gs (Interaction Sol–Biosphere–Atmosphere) simulations of evapotranspiration are assessed at the field scale over a 12-year Mediter...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: S. Garrigues, A. Olioso, J. C. Calvet, E. Martin, S. Lafont, S. Moulin, A. Chanzy, O. Marloie, S. Buis, V. Desfonds, N. Bertrand, D. Renard
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2015-07-01
Series:Hydrology and Earth System Sciences
Online Access:http://www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci.net/19/3109/2015/hess-19-3109-2015.pdf
_version_ 1818910575031222272
author S. Garrigues
A. Olioso
J. C. Calvet
E. Martin
S. Lafont
S. Moulin
A. Chanzy
O. Marloie
S. Buis
V. Desfonds
N. Bertrand
D. Renard
author_facet S. Garrigues
A. Olioso
J. C. Calvet
E. Martin
S. Lafont
S. Moulin
A. Chanzy
O. Marloie
S. Buis
V. Desfonds
N. Bertrand
D. Renard
author_sort S. Garrigues
collection DOAJ
description Evapotranspiration has been recognized as one of the most uncertain terms in the surface water balance simulated by land surface models. In this study, the SURFEX/ISBA-A-gs (Interaction Sol–Biosphere–Atmosphere) simulations of evapotranspiration are assessed at the field scale over a 12-year Mediterranean crop succession. The model is evaluated in its standard implementation which relies on the use of the ISBA pedotransfer estimates of the soil properties. The originality of this work consists in explicitly representing the succession of crop cycles and inter-crop bare soil periods in the simulations and assessing its impact on the dynamics of simulated and measured evapotranspiration over a long period of time. The analysis focuses on key parameters which drive the simulation of ET, namely the rooting depth, the soil moisture at saturation, the soil moisture at field capacity and the soil moisture at wilting point. A sensitivity analysis is first conducted to quantify the relative contribution of each parameter on ET simulation over 12 years. The impact of the estimation method used to retrieve the soil parameters (pedotransfer function, laboratory and field methods) on ET is then analysed. The benefit of representing the variations in time of the rooting depth and wilting point is evaluated. Finally, the propagation of uncertainties in the soil parameters on ET simulations is quantified through a Monte Carlo analysis and compared with the uncertainties triggered by the mesophyll conductance which is a key above-ground driver of the stomatal conductance. <br><br> This work shows that evapotranspiration mainly results from the soil evaporation when it is continuously simulated over a Mediterranean crop succession. This results in a high sensitivity of simulated evapotranspiration to uncertainties in the soil moisture at field capacity and the soil moisture at saturation, both of which drive the simulation of soil evaporation. Field capacity was proved to be the most influencing parameter on the simulation of evapotranspiration over the crop succession. The evapotranspiration simulated with the standard surface and soil parameters of the model is largely underestimated. The deficit in cumulative evapotranspiration amounts to 24 % over 12 years. The bias in daily daytime evapotranspiration is −0.24 mm day<sup>−1</sup>. The ISBA pedotransfer estimates of the soil moisture at saturation and at wilting point are overestimated, which explains most of the evapotranspiration underestimation. The use of field capacity values retrieved from laboratory methods leads to inaccurate simulation of ET due to the lack of representativeness of the soil structure variability at the field scale. The most accurate simulation is achieved with the average values of the soil properties derived from the analysis of field measurements of soil moisture vertical profiles over each crop cycle. The representation of the variations in time of the wilting point and the maximum rooting depth over the crop succession has little impact on the simulation performances. Finally, we show that the uncertainties in the soil parameters can generate substantial uncertainties in ET simulated over 12 years (the 95 % confidence interval represents 23 % of cumulative ET over 12 years). Uncertainties in the mesophyll conductance have lower impact on ET. Measurement random errors explain a large part of the scattering between simulations and measurements at half-hourly timescale. The deficits in simulated ET reported in this work are probably larger due to likely underestimation of ET by eddy-covariance measurements. Other possible model shortcomings include the lack of representation of soil vertical heterogeneity and root profile along with inaccurate energy balance partitioning between the soil and the vegetation at low leaf area index.
first_indexed 2024-12-19T22:44:59Z
format Article
id doaj.art-c0776ac88350482a86a8a8054a97fd09
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1027-5606
1607-7938
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-19T22:44:59Z
publishDate 2015-07-01
publisher Copernicus Publications
record_format Article
series Hydrology and Earth System Sciences
spelling doaj.art-c0776ac88350482a86a8a8054a97fd092022-12-21T20:02:58ZengCopernicus PublicationsHydrology and Earth System Sciences1027-56061607-79382015-07-011973109313110.5194/hess-19-3109-2015Evaluation of land surface model simulations of evapotranspiration over a 12-year crop succession: impact of soil hydraulic and vegetation propertiesS. Garrigues0A. Olioso1J. C. Calvet2E. Martin3S. Lafont4S. Moulin5A. Chanzy6O. Marloie7S. Buis8V. Desfonds9N. Bertrand10D. Renard11EMMAH (UMR1114), INRA, Avignon, FranceEMMAH (UMR1114), INRA, Avignon, FranceCNRM-GAME (UMR3589), Météo-France, CNRS, Toulouse, FranceCNRM-GAME (UMR3589), Météo-France, CNRS, Toulouse, FranceISPA, INRA, Bordeaux, FranceEMMAH (UMR1114), INRA, Avignon, FranceEMMAH (UMR1114), INRA, Avignon, FranceURFM, INRA, Avignon, FranceEMMAH (UMR1114), INRA, Avignon, FranceEMMAH (UMR1114), INRA, Avignon, FranceEMMAH (UMR1114), INRA, Avignon, FranceEMMAH (UMR1114), INRA, Avignon, FranceEvapotranspiration has been recognized as one of the most uncertain terms in the surface water balance simulated by land surface models. In this study, the SURFEX/ISBA-A-gs (Interaction Sol–Biosphere–Atmosphere) simulations of evapotranspiration are assessed at the field scale over a 12-year Mediterranean crop succession. The model is evaluated in its standard implementation which relies on the use of the ISBA pedotransfer estimates of the soil properties. The originality of this work consists in explicitly representing the succession of crop cycles and inter-crop bare soil periods in the simulations and assessing its impact on the dynamics of simulated and measured evapotranspiration over a long period of time. The analysis focuses on key parameters which drive the simulation of ET, namely the rooting depth, the soil moisture at saturation, the soil moisture at field capacity and the soil moisture at wilting point. A sensitivity analysis is first conducted to quantify the relative contribution of each parameter on ET simulation over 12 years. The impact of the estimation method used to retrieve the soil parameters (pedotransfer function, laboratory and field methods) on ET is then analysed. The benefit of representing the variations in time of the rooting depth and wilting point is evaluated. Finally, the propagation of uncertainties in the soil parameters on ET simulations is quantified through a Monte Carlo analysis and compared with the uncertainties triggered by the mesophyll conductance which is a key above-ground driver of the stomatal conductance. <br><br> This work shows that evapotranspiration mainly results from the soil evaporation when it is continuously simulated over a Mediterranean crop succession. This results in a high sensitivity of simulated evapotranspiration to uncertainties in the soil moisture at field capacity and the soil moisture at saturation, both of which drive the simulation of soil evaporation. Field capacity was proved to be the most influencing parameter on the simulation of evapotranspiration over the crop succession. The evapotranspiration simulated with the standard surface and soil parameters of the model is largely underestimated. The deficit in cumulative evapotranspiration amounts to 24 % over 12 years. The bias in daily daytime evapotranspiration is −0.24 mm day<sup>−1</sup>. The ISBA pedotransfer estimates of the soil moisture at saturation and at wilting point are overestimated, which explains most of the evapotranspiration underestimation. The use of field capacity values retrieved from laboratory methods leads to inaccurate simulation of ET due to the lack of representativeness of the soil structure variability at the field scale. The most accurate simulation is achieved with the average values of the soil properties derived from the analysis of field measurements of soil moisture vertical profiles over each crop cycle. The representation of the variations in time of the wilting point and the maximum rooting depth over the crop succession has little impact on the simulation performances. Finally, we show that the uncertainties in the soil parameters can generate substantial uncertainties in ET simulated over 12 years (the 95 % confidence interval represents 23 % of cumulative ET over 12 years). Uncertainties in the mesophyll conductance have lower impact on ET. Measurement random errors explain a large part of the scattering between simulations and measurements at half-hourly timescale. The deficits in simulated ET reported in this work are probably larger due to likely underestimation of ET by eddy-covariance measurements. Other possible model shortcomings include the lack of representation of soil vertical heterogeneity and root profile along with inaccurate energy balance partitioning between the soil and the vegetation at low leaf area index.http://www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci.net/19/3109/2015/hess-19-3109-2015.pdf
spellingShingle S. Garrigues
A. Olioso
J. C. Calvet
E. Martin
S. Lafont
S. Moulin
A. Chanzy
O. Marloie
S. Buis
V. Desfonds
N. Bertrand
D. Renard
Evaluation of land surface model simulations of evapotranspiration over a 12-year crop succession: impact of soil hydraulic and vegetation properties
Hydrology and Earth System Sciences
title Evaluation of land surface model simulations of evapotranspiration over a 12-year crop succession: impact of soil hydraulic and vegetation properties
title_full Evaluation of land surface model simulations of evapotranspiration over a 12-year crop succession: impact of soil hydraulic and vegetation properties
title_fullStr Evaluation of land surface model simulations of evapotranspiration over a 12-year crop succession: impact of soil hydraulic and vegetation properties
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of land surface model simulations of evapotranspiration over a 12-year crop succession: impact of soil hydraulic and vegetation properties
title_short Evaluation of land surface model simulations of evapotranspiration over a 12-year crop succession: impact of soil hydraulic and vegetation properties
title_sort evaluation of land surface model simulations of evapotranspiration over a 12 year crop succession impact of soil hydraulic and vegetation properties
url http://www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci.net/19/3109/2015/hess-19-3109-2015.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT sgarrigues evaluationoflandsurfacemodelsimulationsofevapotranspirationovera12yearcropsuccessionimpactofsoilhydraulicandvegetationproperties
AT aolioso evaluationoflandsurfacemodelsimulationsofevapotranspirationovera12yearcropsuccessionimpactofsoilhydraulicandvegetationproperties
AT jccalvet evaluationoflandsurfacemodelsimulationsofevapotranspirationovera12yearcropsuccessionimpactofsoilhydraulicandvegetationproperties
AT emartin evaluationoflandsurfacemodelsimulationsofevapotranspirationovera12yearcropsuccessionimpactofsoilhydraulicandvegetationproperties
AT slafont evaluationoflandsurfacemodelsimulationsofevapotranspirationovera12yearcropsuccessionimpactofsoilhydraulicandvegetationproperties
AT smoulin evaluationoflandsurfacemodelsimulationsofevapotranspirationovera12yearcropsuccessionimpactofsoilhydraulicandvegetationproperties
AT achanzy evaluationoflandsurfacemodelsimulationsofevapotranspirationovera12yearcropsuccessionimpactofsoilhydraulicandvegetationproperties
AT omarloie evaluationoflandsurfacemodelsimulationsofevapotranspirationovera12yearcropsuccessionimpactofsoilhydraulicandvegetationproperties
AT sbuis evaluationoflandsurfacemodelsimulationsofevapotranspirationovera12yearcropsuccessionimpactofsoilhydraulicandvegetationproperties
AT vdesfonds evaluationoflandsurfacemodelsimulationsofevapotranspirationovera12yearcropsuccessionimpactofsoilhydraulicandvegetationproperties
AT nbertrand evaluationoflandsurfacemodelsimulationsofevapotranspirationovera12yearcropsuccessionimpactofsoilhydraulicandvegetationproperties
AT drenard evaluationoflandsurfacemodelsimulationsofevapotranspirationovera12yearcropsuccessionimpactofsoilhydraulicandvegetationproperties