Critical Analysis of Lean Construction Maturity Models: A Systematic Literature Review
Lean construction (LC) is becoming prevalent, and assessment of the level of LC implementation is vital for organizations to realize their full potential. In meeting that need, lean construction maturity models (LCMMs) play a key role. However, there is less evidence of critical reviews in spite of...
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
MDPI AG
2023-06-01
|
| Series: | Buildings |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2075-5309/13/6/1508 |
| _version_ | 1797595699530956800 |
|---|---|
| author | J. K. D. D. T. Jayanetti B. A. K. S. Perera K. G. A. S. Waidyasekara Mohan Siriwardena |
| author_facet | J. K. D. D. T. Jayanetti B. A. K. S. Perera K. G. A. S. Waidyasekara Mohan Siriwardena |
| author_sort | J. K. D. D. T. Jayanetti |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Lean construction (LC) is becoming prevalent, and assessment of the level of LC implementation is vital for organizations to realize their full potential. In meeting that need, lean construction maturity models (LCMMs) play a key role. However, there is less evidence of critical reviews in spite of the significant number of LCMMs available. Therefore, this study was initiated with the aim of systematically reviewing the literature on existing lean-construction-related maturity models (MMs) through a critical review. The study adopted the PRISMA method to review 24 such models using manual content analysis. The study revealed the most common attributes among the models, along with their key strengths and weaknesses. The findings of this study can be directly used to develop more robust LCMMs and enhance the knowledge base on theoretical underpinnings. From an industry perspective, the findings assist organizations to more effectively assess LC maturity. The study invites further research on the area of LC maturity and advocates for developing new MMs addressing these areas identified for improvement. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-11T02:40:04Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-c08ae30e198e4935b57011f2ea863620 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2075-5309 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-11T02:40:04Z |
| publishDate | 2023-06-01 |
| publisher | MDPI AG |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Buildings |
| spelling | doaj.art-c08ae30e198e4935b57011f2ea8636202023-11-18T09:39:14ZengMDPI AGBuildings2075-53092023-06-01136150810.3390/buildings13061508Critical Analysis of Lean Construction Maturity Models: A Systematic Literature ReviewJ. K. D. D. T. Jayanetti0B. A. K. S. Perera1K. G. A. S. Waidyasekara2Mohan Siriwardena3Department of Building Economics, University of Moratuwa, Katubedda 10400, Sri LankaDepartment of Building Economics, University of Moratuwa, Katubedda 10400, Sri LankaDepartment of Building Economics, University of Moratuwa, Katubedda 10400, Sri LankaFaculty of Engineering and Technology, School of Civil Engineering and Built Environment, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool L3 3AF, UKLean construction (LC) is becoming prevalent, and assessment of the level of LC implementation is vital for organizations to realize their full potential. In meeting that need, lean construction maturity models (LCMMs) play a key role. However, there is less evidence of critical reviews in spite of the significant number of LCMMs available. Therefore, this study was initiated with the aim of systematically reviewing the literature on existing lean-construction-related maturity models (MMs) through a critical review. The study adopted the PRISMA method to review 24 such models using manual content analysis. The study revealed the most common attributes among the models, along with their key strengths and weaknesses. The findings of this study can be directly used to develop more robust LCMMs and enhance the knowledge base on theoretical underpinnings. From an industry perspective, the findings assist organizations to more effectively assess LC maturity. The study invites further research on the area of LC maturity and advocates for developing new MMs addressing these areas identified for improvement.https://www.mdpi.com/2075-5309/13/6/1508lean constructionmaturity modelslean construction attributesassessing lean constructionsystematic review |
| spellingShingle | J. K. D. D. T. Jayanetti B. A. K. S. Perera K. G. A. S. Waidyasekara Mohan Siriwardena Critical Analysis of Lean Construction Maturity Models: A Systematic Literature Review Buildings lean construction maturity models lean construction attributes assessing lean construction systematic review |
| title | Critical Analysis of Lean Construction Maturity Models: A Systematic Literature Review |
| title_full | Critical Analysis of Lean Construction Maturity Models: A Systematic Literature Review |
| title_fullStr | Critical Analysis of Lean Construction Maturity Models: A Systematic Literature Review |
| title_full_unstemmed | Critical Analysis of Lean Construction Maturity Models: A Systematic Literature Review |
| title_short | Critical Analysis of Lean Construction Maturity Models: A Systematic Literature Review |
| title_sort | critical analysis of lean construction maturity models a systematic literature review |
| topic | lean construction maturity models lean construction attributes assessing lean construction systematic review |
| url | https://www.mdpi.com/2075-5309/13/6/1508 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT jkddtjayanetti criticalanalysisofleanconstructionmaturitymodelsasystematicliteraturereview AT baksperera criticalanalysisofleanconstructionmaturitymodelsasystematicliteraturereview AT kgaswaidyasekara criticalanalysisofleanconstructionmaturitymodelsasystematicliteraturereview AT mohansiriwardena criticalanalysisofleanconstructionmaturitymodelsasystematicliteraturereview |