Codifier le divorce international : Quelques remarques sur le projet GEDIP

The EU legislator has modified once again the so-called Brussels 2 bis Regulation. The new regulation 2019/1111 adds new provisions on parental responsibility and child abduction, but leaves those on divorce largely untouched. To the contrary, the GEDIP, an expert group of academics in private inter...

Полное описание

Библиографические подробности
Главный автор: Etienne Pataut
Формат: Статья
Язык:ces
Опубликовано: Karolinum Press 2020-12-01
Серии:Acta Universitatis Carolinae. Iuridica
Предметы:
Online-ссылка:http://www.karolinum.cz/doi/10.14712/23366478.2020.34
_version_ 1828943568434102272
author Etienne Pataut
author_facet Etienne Pataut
author_sort Etienne Pataut
collection DOAJ
description The EU legislator has modified once again the so-called Brussels 2 bis Regulation. The new regulation 2019/1111 adds new provisions on parental responsibility and child abduction, but leaves those on divorce largely untouched. To the contrary, the GEDIP, an expert group of academics in private international law from across Europe, has established an indepth proposal for a new regulation on divorce. This paper analyzes the proposal which seeks to modernize and improve the current situation that has been widely criticized. The proposed regulation covers choice of law, jurisdiction and recognition. It allows limited party autonomy, both in jurisdiction and choice of law, and suggests significant improvements of the provisions on objective jurisdiction. It also recommends a recognition mechanism that would apply to judgements from third States and provides for a comprehensive set of rules concerning private divorces.
first_indexed 2024-12-14T04:17:27Z
format Article
id doaj.art-c08bd44b51ef46e8bb5ca74d271f78a0
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0323-0619
2336-6478
language ces
last_indexed 2024-12-14T04:17:27Z
publishDate 2020-12-01
publisher Karolinum Press
record_format Article
series Acta Universitatis Carolinae. Iuridica
spelling doaj.art-c08bd44b51ef46e8bb5ca74d271f78a02022-12-21T23:17:29ZcesKarolinum PressActa Universitatis Carolinae. Iuridica0323-06192336-64782020-12-016649511510.14712/23366478.2020.3410388Codifier le divorce international : Quelques remarques sur le projet GEDIPEtienne PatautThe EU legislator has modified once again the so-called Brussels 2 bis Regulation. The new regulation 2019/1111 adds new provisions on parental responsibility and child abduction, but leaves those on divorce largely untouched. To the contrary, the GEDIP, an expert group of academics in private international law from across Europe, has established an indepth proposal for a new regulation on divorce. This paper analyzes the proposal which seeks to modernize and improve the current situation that has been widely criticized. The proposed regulation covers choice of law, jurisdiction and recognition. It allows limited party autonomy, both in jurisdiction and choice of law, and suggests significant improvements of the provisions on objective jurisdiction. It also recommends a recognition mechanism that would apply to judgements from third States and provides for a comprehensive set of rules concerning private divorces.http://www.karolinum.cz/doi/10.14712/23366478.2020.34divorcechoice of lawsjurisdictionrecognitiongedip
spellingShingle Etienne Pataut
Codifier le divorce international : Quelques remarques sur le projet GEDIP
Acta Universitatis Carolinae. Iuridica
divorce
choice of laws
jurisdiction
recognition
gedip
title Codifier le divorce international : Quelques remarques sur le projet GEDIP
title_full Codifier le divorce international : Quelques remarques sur le projet GEDIP
title_fullStr Codifier le divorce international : Quelques remarques sur le projet GEDIP
title_full_unstemmed Codifier le divorce international : Quelques remarques sur le projet GEDIP
title_short Codifier le divorce international : Quelques remarques sur le projet GEDIP
title_sort codifier le divorce international quelques remarques sur le projet gedip
topic divorce
choice of laws
jurisdiction
recognition
gedip
url http://www.karolinum.cz/doi/10.14712/23366478.2020.34
work_keys_str_mv AT etiennepataut codifierledivorceinternationalquelquesremarquessurleprojetgedip