Finite Element Analysis of Hysteretic Behavior of Superposed Shear Walls Based on OpenSEES

The superimposed slab shear wall has been found to be more and more applicable in the building construction industry due to its building industrialization superiority. The hysteretic behavior of superimposed slab shear walls accounts for an important part of seismic performance analysis. This paper...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Shaole Yu, Yujian Zhang, Junhao Bie, Wenying Zhang, Jialei Jiang, Hua Chen, Xinxi Chen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2023-05-01
Series:Buildings
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2075-5309/13/6/1382
_version_ 1797595699752206336
author Shaole Yu
Yujian Zhang
Junhao Bie
Wenying Zhang
Jialei Jiang
Hua Chen
Xinxi Chen
author_facet Shaole Yu
Yujian Zhang
Junhao Bie
Wenying Zhang
Jialei Jiang
Hua Chen
Xinxi Chen
author_sort Shaole Yu
collection DOAJ
description The superimposed slab shear wall has been found to be more and more applicable in the building construction industry due to its building industrialization superiority. The hysteretic behavior of superimposed slab shear walls accounts for an important part of seismic performance analysis. This paper presents the results of a numerical study to investigate the hysteretic behavior of superimposed slab shear walls. Different calculation methods of the shear capacity of the combined interface and horizontal connection are introduced. The calculated results show that the shear capacity of the combined interface and horizontal connection is much larger than the ultimate shear capacity of a superimposed slab shear wall. Therefore, the bond slip effect of a combined interface and horizontal connection can be ignored in finite element analysis on the premise of it not affecting calculation precision. Three different theoretical analysis models, namely the vertical multi-line element model, bend–shear coupled fiber model and layered shell element model, were established in OpenSEES based on a macro-model and a micro-model. The results show that the calculated results of the vertical multi-line element model and the bend–shear coupled fiber model agree reasonably with the experiment results, whereas the calculated results of the layered shell model gave a relatively larger initial stiffness.
first_indexed 2024-03-11T02:41:05Z
format Article
id doaj.art-c0a4931f13a54b878fe206e41c32d6e9
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2075-5309
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-11T02:41:05Z
publishDate 2023-05-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Buildings
spelling doaj.art-c0a4931f13a54b878fe206e41c32d6e92023-11-18T09:37:31ZengMDPI AGBuildings2075-53092023-05-01136138210.3390/buildings13061382Finite Element Analysis of Hysteretic Behavior of Superposed Shear Walls Based on OpenSEESShaole Yu0Yujian Zhang1Junhao Bie2Wenying Zhang3Jialei Jiang4Hua Chen5Xinxi Chen6China Construction Eighth Engineering Division Corp. Ltd., Shanghai 200135, ChinaChina Construction Eighth Engineering Division Corp. Ltd., Shanghai 200135, ChinaChina Construction Eighth Engineering Division Corp. Ltd., Shanghai 200135, ChinaCollege of Civil Engineering, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, ChinaChina Construction Eighth Engineering Division Corp. Ltd., Shanghai 200135, ChinaChina Construction Eighth Engineering Division Corp. Ltd., Shanghai 200135, ChinaChina Construction Eighth Engineering Division Corp. Ltd., Shanghai 200135, ChinaThe superimposed slab shear wall has been found to be more and more applicable in the building construction industry due to its building industrialization superiority. The hysteretic behavior of superimposed slab shear walls accounts for an important part of seismic performance analysis. This paper presents the results of a numerical study to investigate the hysteretic behavior of superimposed slab shear walls. Different calculation methods of the shear capacity of the combined interface and horizontal connection are introduced. The calculated results show that the shear capacity of the combined interface and horizontal connection is much larger than the ultimate shear capacity of a superimposed slab shear wall. Therefore, the bond slip effect of a combined interface and horizontal connection can be ignored in finite element analysis on the premise of it not affecting calculation precision. Three different theoretical analysis models, namely the vertical multi-line element model, bend–shear coupled fiber model and layered shell element model, were established in OpenSEES based on a macro-model and a micro-model. The results show that the calculated results of the vertical multi-line element model and the bend–shear coupled fiber model agree reasonably with the experiment results, whereas the calculated results of the layered shell model gave a relatively larger initial stiffness.https://www.mdpi.com/2075-5309/13/6/1382superimposed slab shear wallhysteretic behaviorcombined interfacetheoretical analysis model
spellingShingle Shaole Yu
Yujian Zhang
Junhao Bie
Wenying Zhang
Jialei Jiang
Hua Chen
Xinxi Chen
Finite Element Analysis of Hysteretic Behavior of Superposed Shear Walls Based on OpenSEES
Buildings
superimposed slab shear wall
hysteretic behavior
combined interface
theoretical analysis model
title Finite Element Analysis of Hysteretic Behavior of Superposed Shear Walls Based on OpenSEES
title_full Finite Element Analysis of Hysteretic Behavior of Superposed Shear Walls Based on OpenSEES
title_fullStr Finite Element Analysis of Hysteretic Behavior of Superposed Shear Walls Based on OpenSEES
title_full_unstemmed Finite Element Analysis of Hysteretic Behavior of Superposed Shear Walls Based on OpenSEES
title_short Finite Element Analysis of Hysteretic Behavior of Superposed Shear Walls Based on OpenSEES
title_sort finite element analysis of hysteretic behavior of superposed shear walls based on opensees
topic superimposed slab shear wall
hysteretic behavior
combined interface
theoretical analysis model
url https://www.mdpi.com/2075-5309/13/6/1382
work_keys_str_mv AT shaoleyu finiteelementanalysisofhystereticbehaviorofsuperposedshearwallsbasedonopensees
AT yujianzhang finiteelementanalysisofhystereticbehaviorofsuperposedshearwallsbasedonopensees
AT junhaobie finiteelementanalysisofhystereticbehaviorofsuperposedshearwallsbasedonopensees
AT wenyingzhang finiteelementanalysisofhystereticbehaviorofsuperposedshearwallsbasedonopensees
AT jialeijiang finiteelementanalysisofhystereticbehaviorofsuperposedshearwallsbasedonopensees
AT huachen finiteelementanalysisofhystereticbehaviorofsuperposedshearwallsbasedonopensees
AT xinxichen finiteelementanalysisofhystereticbehaviorofsuperposedshearwallsbasedonopensees