Finite Element Analysis of Hysteretic Behavior of Superposed Shear Walls Based on OpenSEES
The superimposed slab shear wall has been found to be more and more applicable in the building construction industry due to its building industrialization superiority. The hysteretic behavior of superimposed slab shear walls accounts for an important part of seismic performance analysis. This paper...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2023-05-01
|
Series: | Buildings |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2075-5309/13/6/1382 |
_version_ | 1797595699752206336 |
---|---|
author | Shaole Yu Yujian Zhang Junhao Bie Wenying Zhang Jialei Jiang Hua Chen Xinxi Chen |
author_facet | Shaole Yu Yujian Zhang Junhao Bie Wenying Zhang Jialei Jiang Hua Chen Xinxi Chen |
author_sort | Shaole Yu |
collection | DOAJ |
description | The superimposed slab shear wall has been found to be more and more applicable in the building construction industry due to its building industrialization superiority. The hysteretic behavior of superimposed slab shear walls accounts for an important part of seismic performance analysis. This paper presents the results of a numerical study to investigate the hysteretic behavior of superimposed slab shear walls. Different calculation methods of the shear capacity of the combined interface and horizontal connection are introduced. The calculated results show that the shear capacity of the combined interface and horizontal connection is much larger than the ultimate shear capacity of a superimposed slab shear wall. Therefore, the bond slip effect of a combined interface and horizontal connection can be ignored in finite element analysis on the premise of it not affecting calculation precision. Three different theoretical analysis models, namely the vertical multi-line element model, bend–shear coupled fiber model and layered shell element model, were established in OpenSEES based on a macro-model and a micro-model. The results show that the calculated results of the vertical multi-line element model and the bend–shear coupled fiber model agree reasonably with the experiment results, whereas the calculated results of the layered shell model gave a relatively larger initial stiffness. |
first_indexed | 2024-03-11T02:41:05Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-c0a4931f13a54b878fe206e41c32d6e9 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2075-5309 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-03-11T02:41:05Z |
publishDate | 2023-05-01 |
publisher | MDPI AG |
record_format | Article |
series | Buildings |
spelling | doaj.art-c0a4931f13a54b878fe206e41c32d6e92023-11-18T09:37:31ZengMDPI AGBuildings2075-53092023-05-01136138210.3390/buildings13061382Finite Element Analysis of Hysteretic Behavior of Superposed Shear Walls Based on OpenSEESShaole Yu0Yujian Zhang1Junhao Bie2Wenying Zhang3Jialei Jiang4Hua Chen5Xinxi Chen6China Construction Eighth Engineering Division Corp. Ltd., Shanghai 200135, ChinaChina Construction Eighth Engineering Division Corp. Ltd., Shanghai 200135, ChinaChina Construction Eighth Engineering Division Corp. Ltd., Shanghai 200135, ChinaCollege of Civil Engineering, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, ChinaChina Construction Eighth Engineering Division Corp. Ltd., Shanghai 200135, ChinaChina Construction Eighth Engineering Division Corp. Ltd., Shanghai 200135, ChinaChina Construction Eighth Engineering Division Corp. Ltd., Shanghai 200135, ChinaThe superimposed slab shear wall has been found to be more and more applicable in the building construction industry due to its building industrialization superiority. The hysteretic behavior of superimposed slab shear walls accounts for an important part of seismic performance analysis. This paper presents the results of a numerical study to investigate the hysteretic behavior of superimposed slab shear walls. Different calculation methods of the shear capacity of the combined interface and horizontal connection are introduced. The calculated results show that the shear capacity of the combined interface and horizontal connection is much larger than the ultimate shear capacity of a superimposed slab shear wall. Therefore, the bond slip effect of a combined interface and horizontal connection can be ignored in finite element analysis on the premise of it not affecting calculation precision. Three different theoretical analysis models, namely the vertical multi-line element model, bend–shear coupled fiber model and layered shell element model, were established in OpenSEES based on a macro-model and a micro-model. The results show that the calculated results of the vertical multi-line element model and the bend–shear coupled fiber model agree reasonably with the experiment results, whereas the calculated results of the layered shell model gave a relatively larger initial stiffness.https://www.mdpi.com/2075-5309/13/6/1382superimposed slab shear wallhysteretic behaviorcombined interfacetheoretical analysis model |
spellingShingle | Shaole Yu Yujian Zhang Junhao Bie Wenying Zhang Jialei Jiang Hua Chen Xinxi Chen Finite Element Analysis of Hysteretic Behavior of Superposed Shear Walls Based on OpenSEES Buildings superimposed slab shear wall hysteretic behavior combined interface theoretical analysis model |
title | Finite Element Analysis of Hysteretic Behavior of Superposed Shear Walls Based on OpenSEES |
title_full | Finite Element Analysis of Hysteretic Behavior of Superposed Shear Walls Based on OpenSEES |
title_fullStr | Finite Element Analysis of Hysteretic Behavior of Superposed Shear Walls Based on OpenSEES |
title_full_unstemmed | Finite Element Analysis of Hysteretic Behavior of Superposed Shear Walls Based on OpenSEES |
title_short | Finite Element Analysis of Hysteretic Behavior of Superposed Shear Walls Based on OpenSEES |
title_sort | finite element analysis of hysteretic behavior of superposed shear walls based on opensees |
topic | superimposed slab shear wall hysteretic behavior combined interface theoretical analysis model |
url | https://www.mdpi.com/2075-5309/13/6/1382 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT shaoleyu finiteelementanalysisofhystereticbehaviorofsuperposedshearwallsbasedonopensees AT yujianzhang finiteelementanalysisofhystereticbehaviorofsuperposedshearwallsbasedonopensees AT junhaobie finiteelementanalysisofhystereticbehaviorofsuperposedshearwallsbasedonopensees AT wenyingzhang finiteelementanalysisofhystereticbehaviorofsuperposedshearwallsbasedonopensees AT jialeijiang finiteelementanalysisofhystereticbehaviorofsuperposedshearwallsbasedonopensees AT huachen finiteelementanalysisofhystereticbehaviorofsuperposedshearwallsbasedonopensees AT xinxichen finiteelementanalysisofhystereticbehaviorofsuperposedshearwallsbasedonopensees |