Inequitable treatment as perceived by international medical graduates (IMGs): a scoping review

Objectives This scoping review seeks to detail experiences of inequitable treatment, as self-reported by international medical graduates (IMGs), across time and location.Design Scoping review.Search strategy Three academic medical databases (MEDLINE, SCOPUS and PSYCINFO) and grey literature (GOOGLE...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kristy Fakes, Sunita Joann Rebecca Healey, Balakrishnan R Nair
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMJ Publishing Group 2023-07-01
Series:BMJ Open
Online Access:https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/13/7/e071992.full
_version_ 1827156378516455424
author Kristy Fakes
Sunita Joann Rebecca Healey
Balakrishnan R Nair
author_facet Kristy Fakes
Sunita Joann Rebecca Healey
Balakrishnan R Nair
author_sort Kristy Fakes
collection DOAJ
description Objectives This scoping review seeks to detail experiences of inequitable treatment, as self-reported by international medical graduates (IMGs), across time and location.Design Scoping review.Search strategy Three academic medical databases (MEDLINE, SCOPUS and PSYCINFO) and grey literature (GOOGLE SCHOLAR) were systematically searched for studies reporting first-hand IMG experiences of perceived inequitable treatment in the workplace: discrimination, prejudice or bias. Original (in English) qualitative, quantitative, mixed studies or inquiry-based reports from inception until 31 December 2022, which documented direct involvement of IMGs in the data were eligible for inclusion in the review. Systematic reviews, scoping reviews, letters, editorials, news items and commentaries were excluded. Study characteristics and common themes were identified and analysed through an iterative process.Results We found 33 publications representing 31 studies from USA, Australia, UK, Canada, Germany, Finland, South Africa, Austria, Ireland and Saudi Arabia, published between 1982 and 2022. Common themes identified by extraction were: (1) inadequate professional recognition, including unmatched assigned work or pay; (2) perceived lack of choice and opportunities such as limited freedoms and perceived control over own future; (3) marginalisation—subtle interpersonal exclusions, stereotypes and stigma; (4) favouring of local graduates; (5) verbal insults, culturally or racially insensitive or offensive comments; and (6) harsher sanctions. Other themes identified were effects on well-being and proposed solutions to inequity.Conclusions This study found evidence that IMGs believe they are subject to numerous common inequitable workplace experiences and that these experiences have self-reported repercussions on well-being and career trajectory. Further research is needed to substantiate correlations and causality in relation to outcomes of well-being and differential career attainment. Furthermore, research into support for IMGs and the creation of more equitable workforce environments is also recommended.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T15:29:53Z
format Article
id doaj.art-c0a75be714e54879a6943659e1712a2d
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2044-6055
language English
last_indexed 2025-03-20T23:08:30Z
publishDate 2023-07-01
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format Article
series BMJ Open
spelling doaj.art-c0a75be714e54879a6943659e1712a2d2024-08-04T15:10:10ZengBMJ Publishing GroupBMJ Open2044-60552023-07-0113710.1136/bmjopen-2023-071992Inequitable treatment as perceived by international medical graduates (IMGs): a scoping reviewKristy Fakes0Sunita Joann Rebecca Healey1Balakrishnan R Nair2College of Health Medicine and Wellbeing, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, AustraliaCollege of Health Medicine and Wellbeing, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, AustraliaCollege of Health Medicine and Wellbeing, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, AustraliaObjectives This scoping review seeks to detail experiences of inequitable treatment, as self-reported by international medical graduates (IMGs), across time and location.Design Scoping review.Search strategy Three academic medical databases (MEDLINE, SCOPUS and PSYCINFO) and grey literature (GOOGLE SCHOLAR) were systematically searched for studies reporting first-hand IMG experiences of perceived inequitable treatment in the workplace: discrimination, prejudice or bias. Original (in English) qualitative, quantitative, mixed studies or inquiry-based reports from inception until 31 December 2022, which documented direct involvement of IMGs in the data were eligible for inclusion in the review. Systematic reviews, scoping reviews, letters, editorials, news items and commentaries were excluded. Study characteristics and common themes were identified and analysed through an iterative process.Results We found 33 publications representing 31 studies from USA, Australia, UK, Canada, Germany, Finland, South Africa, Austria, Ireland and Saudi Arabia, published between 1982 and 2022. Common themes identified by extraction were: (1) inadequate professional recognition, including unmatched assigned work or pay; (2) perceived lack of choice and opportunities such as limited freedoms and perceived control over own future; (3) marginalisation—subtle interpersonal exclusions, stereotypes and stigma; (4) favouring of local graduates; (5) verbal insults, culturally or racially insensitive or offensive comments; and (6) harsher sanctions. Other themes identified were effects on well-being and proposed solutions to inequity.Conclusions This study found evidence that IMGs believe they are subject to numerous common inequitable workplace experiences and that these experiences have self-reported repercussions on well-being and career trajectory. Further research is needed to substantiate correlations and causality in relation to outcomes of well-being and differential career attainment. Furthermore, research into support for IMGs and the creation of more equitable workforce environments is also recommended.https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/13/7/e071992.full
spellingShingle Kristy Fakes
Sunita Joann Rebecca Healey
Balakrishnan R Nair
Inequitable treatment as perceived by international medical graduates (IMGs): a scoping review
BMJ Open
title Inequitable treatment as perceived by international medical graduates (IMGs): a scoping review
title_full Inequitable treatment as perceived by international medical graduates (IMGs): a scoping review
title_fullStr Inequitable treatment as perceived by international medical graduates (IMGs): a scoping review
title_full_unstemmed Inequitable treatment as perceived by international medical graduates (IMGs): a scoping review
title_short Inequitable treatment as perceived by international medical graduates (IMGs): a scoping review
title_sort inequitable treatment as perceived by international medical graduates imgs a scoping review
url https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/13/7/e071992.full
work_keys_str_mv AT kristyfakes inequitabletreatmentasperceivedbyinternationalmedicalgraduatesimgsascopingreview
AT sunitajoannrebeccahealey inequitabletreatmentasperceivedbyinternationalmedicalgraduatesimgsascopingreview
AT balakrishnanrnair inequitabletreatmentasperceivedbyinternationalmedicalgraduatesimgsascopingreview