Fashion/Photo/Film: The Intertextual Discourse of Funny Face (1956)

In this paper I mobilize Funny Face (dir. Stanley Donen, 1956) to examine the intertextual nexus between fashion, fashion photography, and film. Set in New York City and Paris, with costume design by Hubert de Givenchy and Edith Head, the film is a latter day telling of the Pygmalion myth, such that...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Paul Jobling
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Centre for Fashion Diversity and Social Change, Ryerson University 2018-06-01
Series:Fashion Studies
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.fashionstudies.ca/fashion/photo/film
_version_ 1828883639759273984
author Paul Jobling
author_facet Paul Jobling
author_sort Paul Jobling
collection DOAJ
description In this paper I mobilize Funny Face (dir. Stanley Donen, 1956) to examine the intertextual nexus between fashion, fashion photography, and film. Set in New York City and Paris, with costume design by Hubert de Givenchy and Edith Head, the film is a latter day telling of the Pygmalion myth, such that photographer Dick Avery (Fred Astaire) and Maggie Prescott (Kay Thompson), the dictatorial Fashion Editor of Quality, take up the challenge of converting Jo Stockton (Audrey Hepburn), whom they regard as an unprepossessing bookstore intellectual, into a top model. Thus I analyze how a film that is more generally regarded as a benchmark in the Hollywood musical for its exuberant use of colour and songs is, more particularly, a cinematic locus for both the mediation and mediatization of fashionable identities. To this end, I assess how the film elaborates the power of the fashion industry as a matter of social practice in regards to Foucauldian discourse and the related concept of the énoncé, or event/statement. Thus I evince I two events/statements — “Think Pink!” and “Bonjour Paris” — to discuss in particular the relationship of style to national identities and the need or desire for America to assert cultural leadership in fashion photography, art, and design over France in the context of 1950s Cold War politics. By comparison, I enlist the statements, “Take the Picture!” and “A Bird of Paradise,” to examine respectively the dynamic of looking/gazing between the fashion photographer and designer and their (in this case) female models, the nexus between star designing, clothing, and gender identity, and what Foucault calls assujetissement — subjection — which connotes the dual process of Jo’s subordination as well as the act of her becoming or “being made” a subject according to a system of power.
first_indexed 2024-12-13T10:53:09Z
format Article
id doaj.art-c0bef48a01084dd39ab06133e3f79acf
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2371-3453
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-13T10:53:09Z
publishDate 2018-06-01
publisher Centre for Fashion Diversity and Social Change, Ryerson University
record_format Article
series Fashion Studies
spelling doaj.art-c0bef48a01084dd39ab06133e3f79acf2022-12-21T23:49:45ZengCentre for Fashion Diversity and Social Change, Ryerson UniversityFashion Studies2371-34532018-06-011113310.38055/FS010109Fashion/Photo/Film: The Intertextual Discourse of Funny Face (1956)Paul Jobling0Parsons New School, ParisIn this paper I mobilize Funny Face (dir. Stanley Donen, 1956) to examine the intertextual nexus between fashion, fashion photography, and film. Set in New York City and Paris, with costume design by Hubert de Givenchy and Edith Head, the film is a latter day telling of the Pygmalion myth, such that photographer Dick Avery (Fred Astaire) and Maggie Prescott (Kay Thompson), the dictatorial Fashion Editor of Quality, take up the challenge of converting Jo Stockton (Audrey Hepburn), whom they regard as an unprepossessing bookstore intellectual, into a top model. Thus I analyze how a film that is more generally regarded as a benchmark in the Hollywood musical for its exuberant use of colour and songs is, more particularly, a cinematic locus for both the mediation and mediatization of fashionable identities. To this end, I assess how the film elaborates the power of the fashion industry as a matter of social practice in regards to Foucauldian discourse and the related concept of the énoncé, or event/statement. Thus I evince I two events/statements — “Think Pink!” and “Bonjour Paris” — to discuss in particular the relationship of style to national identities and the need or desire for America to assert cultural leadership in fashion photography, art, and design over France in the context of 1950s Cold War politics. By comparison, I enlist the statements, “Take the Picture!” and “A Bird of Paradise,” to examine respectively the dynamic of looking/gazing between the fashion photographer and designer and their (in this case) female models, the nexus between star designing, clothing, and gender identity, and what Foucault calls assujetissement — subjection — which connotes the dual process of Jo’s subordination as well as the act of her becoming or “being made” a subject according to a system of power.https://www.fashionstudies.ca/fashion/photo/filmdiscourseintertexualitystyle and nationalismsubjection
spellingShingle Paul Jobling
Fashion/Photo/Film: The Intertextual Discourse of Funny Face (1956)
Fashion Studies
discourse
intertexuality
style and nationalism
subjection
title Fashion/Photo/Film: The Intertextual Discourse of Funny Face (1956)
title_full Fashion/Photo/Film: The Intertextual Discourse of Funny Face (1956)
title_fullStr Fashion/Photo/Film: The Intertextual Discourse of Funny Face (1956)
title_full_unstemmed Fashion/Photo/Film: The Intertextual Discourse of Funny Face (1956)
title_short Fashion/Photo/Film: The Intertextual Discourse of Funny Face (1956)
title_sort fashion photo film the intertextual discourse of funny face 1956
topic discourse
intertexuality
style and nationalism
subjection
url https://www.fashionstudies.ca/fashion/photo/film
work_keys_str_mv AT pauljobling fashionphotofilmtheintertextualdiscourseoffunnyface1956