Familywise type I error of ANOVA and ANOVA on ranks in factorial experiments

ABSTRACT: This research evaluated the importance of a preliminary general analysis of variance (ANOVA) in the interpretation of data from factorial experiments under total nullity. For this, we evaluated the familywise type I error rate (accumulated FWER) of the F test for the unfolding of factorial...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: André Mundstock Xavier de Carvalho, Matheus Romano de Souza, Tadeu Bernardes Marques, Davi Leite de Souza, Emanuel Fernando Maia de Souza
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Universidade Federal de Santa Maria 2022-10-01
Series:Ciência Rural
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-84782023000700201&tlng=en
_version_ 1811338543256043520
author André Mundstock Xavier de Carvalho
Matheus Romano de Souza
Tadeu Bernardes Marques
Davi Leite de Souza
Emanuel Fernando Maia de Souza
author_facet André Mundstock Xavier de Carvalho
Matheus Romano de Souza
Tadeu Bernardes Marques
Davi Leite de Souza
Emanuel Fernando Maia de Souza
author_sort André Mundstock Xavier de Carvalho
collection DOAJ
description ABSTRACT: This research evaluated the importance of a preliminary general analysis of variance (ANOVA) in the interpretation of data from factorial experiments under total nullity. For this, we evaluated the familywise type I error rate (accumulated FWER) of the F test for the unfolding of factorial ANOVA and factorial ANOVA on ranks, which were compared with the FWER for the global effect of treatments. In addition, we evaluated the FWER of the Tukey’s test under total nullity for factorial experiments in the presence or absence of preliminary ANOVA protection (omnibus F test). The study was conducted by simulating data from 2,000 experiments, which were separated into four representative agricultural research scenarios. For both the parametric factorial ANOVA and the non-parametric factorial ANOVA, the FWER significantly exceeded the nominal level of 5%, even under total nullity. While the tests that control the total FWER in the factorials are not being used, the factorial ANOVA should not be performed without the preliminary ANOVA F test showing a significant effect. This, of course, does not apply to tests that are not multiple comparisons, such as Bonferroni, Dunn-Sidak and others, which do not need ANOVA protection. The same recommendation applies to the factorial ANOVA on ranks.
first_indexed 2024-04-13T18:12:28Z
format Article
id doaj.art-c0e0ebde869e477d8ff116e1245297d3
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1678-4596
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T18:12:28Z
publishDate 2022-10-01
publisher Universidade Federal de Santa Maria
record_format Article
series Ciência Rural
spelling doaj.art-c0e0ebde869e477d8ff116e1245297d32022-12-22T02:35:50ZengUniversidade Federal de Santa MariaCiência Rural1678-45962022-10-0153710.1590/0103-8478cr20220146Familywise type I error of ANOVA and ANOVA on ranks in factorial experimentsAndré Mundstock Xavier de Carvalhohttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-2806-6058Matheus Romano de Souzahttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-8339-2035Tadeu Bernardes Marqueshttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-9774-2622Davi Leite de Souzahttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-1415-1112Emanuel Fernando Maia de Souzahttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-5493-2183ABSTRACT: This research evaluated the importance of a preliminary general analysis of variance (ANOVA) in the interpretation of data from factorial experiments under total nullity. For this, we evaluated the familywise type I error rate (accumulated FWER) of the F test for the unfolding of factorial ANOVA and factorial ANOVA on ranks, which were compared with the FWER for the global effect of treatments. In addition, we evaluated the FWER of the Tukey’s test under total nullity for factorial experiments in the presence or absence of preliminary ANOVA protection (omnibus F test). The study was conducted by simulating data from 2,000 experiments, which were separated into four representative agricultural research scenarios. For both the parametric factorial ANOVA and the non-parametric factorial ANOVA, the FWER significantly exceeded the nominal level of 5%, even under total nullity. While the tests that control the total FWER in the factorials are not being used, the factorial ANOVA should not be performed without the preliminary ANOVA F test showing a significant effect. This, of course, does not apply to tests that are not multiple comparisons, such as Bonferroni, Dunn-Sidak and others, which do not need ANOVA protection. The same recommendation applies to the factorial ANOVA on ranks.http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-84782023000700201&tlng=enomnibus F-testaligned rank transformationmultiplicity in multiway ANOVA
spellingShingle André Mundstock Xavier de Carvalho
Matheus Romano de Souza
Tadeu Bernardes Marques
Davi Leite de Souza
Emanuel Fernando Maia de Souza
Familywise type I error of ANOVA and ANOVA on ranks in factorial experiments
Ciência Rural
omnibus F-test
aligned rank transformation
multiplicity in multiway ANOVA
title Familywise type I error of ANOVA and ANOVA on ranks in factorial experiments
title_full Familywise type I error of ANOVA and ANOVA on ranks in factorial experiments
title_fullStr Familywise type I error of ANOVA and ANOVA on ranks in factorial experiments
title_full_unstemmed Familywise type I error of ANOVA and ANOVA on ranks in factorial experiments
title_short Familywise type I error of ANOVA and ANOVA on ranks in factorial experiments
title_sort familywise type i error of anova and anova on ranks in factorial experiments
topic omnibus F-test
aligned rank transformation
multiplicity in multiway ANOVA
url http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-84782023000700201&tlng=en
work_keys_str_mv AT andremundstockxavierdecarvalho familywisetypeierrorofanovaandanovaonranksinfactorialexperiments
AT matheusromanodesouza familywisetypeierrorofanovaandanovaonranksinfactorialexperiments
AT tadeubernardesmarques familywisetypeierrorofanovaandanovaonranksinfactorialexperiments
AT davileitedesouza familywisetypeierrorofanovaandanovaonranksinfactorialexperiments
AT emanuelfernandomaiadesouza familywisetypeierrorofanovaandanovaonranksinfactorialexperiments