Epigenome-wide DNA methylation and risk of breast cancer: a systematic review

Abstract Background DNA methylation is a potential biomarker for early detection of breast cancer. However, robust evidence of a prospective relationship between DNA methylation patterns and breast cancer risk is still lacking. The objective of this study is to provide a systematic analysis of the f...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kaoutar Ennour-Idrissi, Dzevka Dragic, Francine Durocher, Caroline Diorio
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2020-10-01
Series:BMC Cancer
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12885-020-07543-4
_version_ 1818978402164539392
author Kaoutar Ennour-Idrissi
Dzevka Dragic
Francine Durocher
Caroline Diorio
author_facet Kaoutar Ennour-Idrissi
Dzevka Dragic
Francine Durocher
Caroline Diorio
author_sort Kaoutar Ennour-Idrissi
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background DNA methylation is a potential biomarker for early detection of breast cancer. However, robust evidence of a prospective relationship between DNA methylation patterns and breast cancer risk is still lacking. The objective of this study is to provide a systematic analysis of the findings of epigenome-wide DNA methylation studies on breast cancer risk, in light of their methodological strengths and weaknesses. Methods We searched major databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, CENTRAL) from inception up to 30th June 2019, for observational or intervention studies investigating the association between epigenome-wide DNA methylation (using the HM450k or EPIC BeadChip), measured in any type of human sample, and breast cancer risk. A pre-established protocol was drawn up following the Cochrane Reviews rigorous methodology. Study selection, data abstraction, and risk of bias assessment were performed by at least two investigators. A qualitative synthesis and systematic comparison of the strengths and weaknesses of studies was performed. Results Overall, 20 studies using the HM450k BeadChip were included, 17 of which had measured blood-derived DNA methylation. There was a consistent trend toward an association of global blood-derived DNA hypomethylation and higher epigenetic age with higher risk of breast cancer. The strength of associations was modest for global hypomethylation and relatively weak for most of epigenetic age algorithms. Differences in length of follow-up periods may have influenced the ability to detect associations, as studies reporting follow-up periods shorter than 10 years were more likely to observe an association with global DNA methylation. Probe-wise differential methylation analyses identified between one and 806 differentially methylated CpGs positions in 10 studies. None of the identified differentially methylated sites overlapped between studies. Three studies used breast tissue DNA and suffered major methodological issues that precludes any conclusion. Overall risk of bias was critical mainly because of incomplete control of confounding. Important issues relative to data preprocessing could have limited the consistency of results. Conclusions Global DNA methylation may be a short-term predictor of breast cancer risk. Further studies with rigorous methodology are needed to determine spatial distribution of DNA hypomethylation and identify differentially methylated sites associated with risk of breast cancer. Prospero registration number CRD42020147244
first_indexed 2024-12-20T16:43:04Z
format Article
id doaj.art-c0e1e06975974c20b558075ddbc2b803
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1471-2407
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-20T16:43:04Z
publishDate 2020-10-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Cancer
spelling doaj.art-c0e1e06975974c20b558075ddbc2b8032022-12-21T19:33:00ZengBMCBMC Cancer1471-24072020-10-0120111010.1186/s12885-020-07543-4Epigenome-wide DNA methylation and risk of breast cancer: a systematic reviewKaoutar Ennour-Idrissi0Dzevka Dragic1Francine Durocher2Caroline Diorio3Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Laval UniversityDepartment of Social and Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Laval UniversityLaval University Cancer Research CenterDepartment of Social and Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Laval UniversityAbstract Background DNA methylation is a potential biomarker for early detection of breast cancer. However, robust evidence of a prospective relationship between DNA methylation patterns and breast cancer risk is still lacking. The objective of this study is to provide a systematic analysis of the findings of epigenome-wide DNA methylation studies on breast cancer risk, in light of their methodological strengths and weaknesses. Methods We searched major databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, CENTRAL) from inception up to 30th June 2019, for observational or intervention studies investigating the association between epigenome-wide DNA methylation (using the HM450k or EPIC BeadChip), measured in any type of human sample, and breast cancer risk. A pre-established protocol was drawn up following the Cochrane Reviews rigorous methodology. Study selection, data abstraction, and risk of bias assessment were performed by at least two investigators. A qualitative synthesis and systematic comparison of the strengths and weaknesses of studies was performed. Results Overall, 20 studies using the HM450k BeadChip were included, 17 of which had measured blood-derived DNA methylation. There was a consistent trend toward an association of global blood-derived DNA hypomethylation and higher epigenetic age with higher risk of breast cancer. The strength of associations was modest for global hypomethylation and relatively weak for most of epigenetic age algorithms. Differences in length of follow-up periods may have influenced the ability to detect associations, as studies reporting follow-up periods shorter than 10 years were more likely to observe an association with global DNA methylation. Probe-wise differential methylation analyses identified between one and 806 differentially methylated CpGs positions in 10 studies. None of the identified differentially methylated sites overlapped between studies. Three studies used breast tissue DNA and suffered major methodological issues that precludes any conclusion. Overall risk of bias was critical mainly because of incomplete control of confounding. Important issues relative to data preprocessing could have limited the consistency of results. Conclusions Global DNA methylation may be a short-term predictor of breast cancer risk. Further studies with rigorous methodology are needed to determine spatial distribution of DNA hypomethylation and identify differentially methylated sites associated with risk of breast cancer. Prospero registration number CRD42020147244http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12885-020-07543-4Breast cancer riskDNA methylationEpigenome-wideHM450kSystematic review
spellingShingle Kaoutar Ennour-Idrissi
Dzevka Dragic
Francine Durocher
Caroline Diorio
Epigenome-wide DNA methylation and risk of breast cancer: a systematic review
BMC Cancer
Breast cancer risk
DNA methylation
Epigenome-wide
HM450k
Systematic review
title Epigenome-wide DNA methylation and risk of breast cancer: a systematic review
title_full Epigenome-wide DNA methylation and risk of breast cancer: a systematic review
title_fullStr Epigenome-wide DNA methylation and risk of breast cancer: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Epigenome-wide DNA methylation and risk of breast cancer: a systematic review
title_short Epigenome-wide DNA methylation and risk of breast cancer: a systematic review
title_sort epigenome wide dna methylation and risk of breast cancer a systematic review
topic Breast cancer risk
DNA methylation
Epigenome-wide
HM450k
Systematic review
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12885-020-07543-4
work_keys_str_mv AT kaoutarennouridrissi epigenomewidednamethylationandriskofbreastcancerasystematicreview
AT dzevkadragic epigenomewidednamethylationandriskofbreastcancerasystematicreview
AT francinedurocher epigenomewidednamethylationandriskofbreastcancerasystematicreview
AT carolinediorio epigenomewidednamethylationandriskofbreastcancerasystematicreview