Subjective assessment of bonded fixed lingual retainers: A questionnaire survey

Aims: This study aimed to assess the patients' subjective assessment of bonded fixed lingual retainers after completion of active orthodontic treatment. Objective: A questionnaire comprising 11 questions evaluated the patients' experience with bonded fixed lingual retainer. Materials and M...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Narayan B Kulkarni, Vinaykumar D Shah
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2023-01-01
Series:Advances in Human Biology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.aihbonline.com/article.asp?issn=2321-8568;year=2023;volume=13;issue=1;spage=30;epage=35;aulast=Kulkarni
_version_ 1828014261406793728
author Narayan B Kulkarni
Vinaykumar D Shah
author_facet Narayan B Kulkarni
Vinaykumar D Shah
author_sort Narayan B Kulkarni
collection DOAJ
description Aims: This study aimed to assess the patients' subjective assessment of bonded fixed lingual retainers after completion of active orthodontic treatment. Objective: A questionnaire comprising 11 questions evaluated the patients' experience with bonded fixed lingual retainer. Materials and Methods: The content was validated by a group of seven experienced orthodontists. The questionnaire survey was run using Google Forms, responded by 45 (50.6%) males and 44 (49.4%) females between the ages ranging from 19 to 42 years. Their responses were rated on a Visual Analogue Scale as applicable. Cronbach's alpha test was utilised for assessing the reliability, and the Chi-square test was used for the quantitative variables. Results: 33.7% of individuals were most comfortable, and 2.2% had severe discomfort during retainer placement. 6.6% of individuals had severe difficulty maintaining oral hygiene in the upper arch and 4.4% in lower teeth and gums, respectively. 2.2% had severe difficulty in speech. 85.4% had no tongue ulceration. 37.1% of respondents had a very good overall experience with fixed bonded lingual retainer, 59.5% had mild problems and only 1.1% had severe problems with a very bad experience. Conclusions: The study concluded that the overall experience of respondents with fixed lingual bonded retainer had mild problems. It was comfortable for most of the patients in maintaining oral hygiene with mild difficulty in speech and chewing. The cause of failure of the retainer was mainly due to bond failure or broken wire in the retainer.
first_indexed 2024-04-10T09:58:06Z
format Article
id doaj.art-c0eef5ddf26c4f10a1b9a5aafdc3302e
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2321-8568
2348-4691
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-10T09:58:06Z
publishDate 2023-01-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
record_format Article
series Advances in Human Biology
spelling doaj.art-c0eef5ddf26c4f10a1b9a5aafdc3302e2023-02-16T11:59:51ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsAdvances in Human Biology2321-85682348-46912023-01-01131303510.4103/aihb.aihb_122_21Subjective assessment of bonded fixed lingual retainers: A questionnaire surveyNarayan B KulkarniVinaykumar D ShahAims: This study aimed to assess the patients' subjective assessment of bonded fixed lingual retainers after completion of active orthodontic treatment. Objective: A questionnaire comprising 11 questions evaluated the patients' experience with bonded fixed lingual retainer. Materials and Methods: The content was validated by a group of seven experienced orthodontists. The questionnaire survey was run using Google Forms, responded by 45 (50.6%) males and 44 (49.4%) females between the ages ranging from 19 to 42 years. Their responses were rated on a Visual Analogue Scale as applicable. Cronbach's alpha test was utilised for assessing the reliability, and the Chi-square test was used for the quantitative variables. Results: 33.7% of individuals were most comfortable, and 2.2% had severe discomfort during retainer placement. 6.6% of individuals had severe difficulty maintaining oral hygiene in the upper arch and 4.4% in lower teeth and gums, respectively. 2.2% had severe difficulty in speech. 85.4% had no tongue ulceration. 37.1% of respondents had a very good overall experience with fixed bonded lingual retainer, 59.5% had mild problems and only 1.1% had severe problems with a very bad experience. Conclusions: The study concluded that the overall experience of respondents with fixed lingual bonded retainer had mild problems. It was comfortable for most of the patients in maintaining oral hygiene with mild difficulty in speech and chewing. The cause of failure of the retainer was mainly due to bond failure or broken wire in the retainer.http://www.aihbonline.com/article.asp?issn=2321-8568;year=2023;volume=13;issue=1;spage=30;epage=35;aulast=Kulkarnibonded lingual retainerpatients' subjective assessmentquestionnaire study
spellingShingle Narayan B Kulkarni
Vinaykumar D Shah
Subjective assessment of bonded fixed lingual retainers: A questionnaire survey
Advances in Human Biology
bonded lingual retainer
patients' subjective assessment
questionnaire study
title Subjective assessment of bonded fixed lingual retainers: A questionnaire survey
title_full Subjective assessment of bonded fixed lingual retainers: A questionnaire survey
title_fullStr Subjective assessment of bonded fixed lingual retainers: A questionnaire survey
title_full_unstemmed Subjective assessment of bonded fixed lingual retainers: A questionnaire survey
title_short Subjective assessment of bonded fixed lingual retainers: A questionnaire survey
title_sort subjective assessment of bonded fixed lingual retainers a questionnaire survey
topic bonded lingual retainer
patients' subjective assessment
questionnaire study
url http://www.aihbonline.com/article.asp?issn=2321-8568;year=2023;volume=13;issue=1;spage=30;epage=35;aulast=Kulkarni
work_keys_str_mv AT narayanbkulkarni subjectiveassessmentofbondedfixedlingualretainersaquestionnairesurvey
AT vinaykumardshah subjectiveassessmentofbondedfixedlingualretainersaquestionnairesurvey