Affective Valence Regulates Associative Competition in Pavlovian Conditioning

Evidence suggests that, in Pavlovian conditioning, associations form between conditioned stimuli and multiple components of the unconditioned stimulus (US). It is common, for example, to regard USs as composed of sensory and affective components, the latter being either appetitive (e.g., food or wat...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Vincent Laurent, R. Frederick Westbrook, Bernard W. Balleine
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-03-01
Series:Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnbeh.2022.801474/full
_version_ 1819120171838603264
author Vincent Laurent
R. Frederick Westbrook
Bernard W. Balleine
author_facet Vincent Laurent
R. Frederick Westbrook
Bernard W. Balleine
author_sort Vincent Laurent
collection DOAJ
description Evidence suggests that, in Pavlovian conditioning, associations form between conditioned stimuli and multiple components of the unconditioned stimulus (US). It is common, for example, to regard USs as composed of sensory and affective components, the latter being either appetitive (e.g., food or water) or aversive (e.g., shock or illness) and, therefore, to suppose different USs of the same affective class activate a common affective system. Furthermore, evidence is growing for the suggestion that, in competitive learning situations, competition between predictive stimuli is primarily for association with the affective system activated by the US. Thus, a conditioned stimulus (CS) previously paired with one US will block conditioning to another CS when both are presented together and paired with a different US of the same affective class, a phenomenon called transreinforcer blocking. Importantly, similar effects have been reported when steps are taken to turn the pretrained CS into a conditioned inhibitor, which activates the opposing affective state to the excitor that it inhibits. Thus, an appetitive inhibitor can block conditioning to a second CS when they are presented together and paired with foot shock. Here we show that the same is true of an aversive inhibitor. In two experiments conducted in rats, we found evidence that an aversive inhibitor blocked conditioning to a second CS when presented in a compound and paired with food. Such findings demonstrate that affective processes and their opponency organize appetitive-aversive interactions and establish the valences on which they are based, consistent with incentive theories of Pavlovian conditioning.
first_indexed 2024-12-22T06:16:26Z
format Article
id doaj.art-c0fbf800642a4601814fa22a3644ab1d
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1662-5153
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-22T06:16:26Z
publishDate 2022-03-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
spelling doaj.art-c0fbf800642a4601814fa22a3644ab1d2022-12-21T18:36:05ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience1662-51532022-03-011610.3389/fnbeh.2022.801474801474Affective Valence Regulates Associative Competition in Pavlovian ConditioningVincent LaurentR. Frederick WestbrookBernard W. BalleineEvidence suggests that, in Pavlovian conditioning, associations form between conditioned stimuli and multiple components of the unconditioned stimulus (US). It is common, for example, to regard USs as composed of sensory and affective components, the latter being either appetitive (e.g., food or water) or aversive (e.g., shock or illness) and, therefore, to suppose different USs of the same affective class activate a common affective system. Furthermore, evidence is growing for the suggestion that, in competitive learning situations, competition between predictive stimuli is primarily for association with the affective system activated by the US. Thus, a conditioned stimulus (CS) previously paired with one US will block conditioning to another CS when both are presented together and paired with a different US of the same affective class, a phenomenon called transreinforcer blocking. Importantly, similar effects have been reported when steps are taken to turn the pretrained CS into a conditioned inhibitor, which activates the opposing affective state to the excitor that it inhibits. Thus, an appetitive inhibitor can block conditioning to a second CS when they are presented together and paired with foot shock. Here we show that the same is true of an aversive inhibitor. In two experiments conducted in rats, we found evidence that an aversive inhibitor blocked conditioning to a second CS when presented in a compound and paired with food. Such findings demonstrate that affective processes and their opponency organize appetitive-aversive interactions and establish the valences on which they are based, consistent with incentive theories of Pavlovian conditioning.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnbeh.2022.801474/fullPavlovian conditioningincentive learningappetitive-aversive interactionsprediction erroraffectvalence
spellingShingle Vincent Laurent
R. Frederick Westbrook
Bernard W. Balleine
Affective Valence Regulates Associative Competition in Pavlovian Conditioning
Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
Pavlovian conditioning
incentive learning
appetitive-aversive interactions
prediction error
affect
valence
title Affective Valence Regulates Associative Competition in Pavlovian Conditioning
title_full Affective Valence Regulates Associative Competition in Pavlovian Conditioning
title_fullStr Affective Valence Regulates Associative Competition in Pavlovian Conditioning
title_full_unstemmed Affective Valence Regulates Associative Competition in Pavlovian Conditioning
title_short Affective Valence Regulates Associative Competition in Pavlovian Conditioning
title_sort affective valence regulates associative competition in pavlovian conditioning
topic Pavlovian conditioning
incentive learning
appetitive-aversive interactions
prediction error
affect
valence
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnbeh.2022.801474/full
work_keys_str_mv AT vincentlaurent affectivevalenceregulatesassociativecompetitioninpavlovianconditioning
AT rfrederickwestbrook affectivevalenceregulatesassociativecompetitioninpavlovianconditioning
AT bernardwballeine affectivevalenceregulatesassociativecompetitioninpavlovianconditioning