Status specific tailoring of sperm behavior in an external fertilizer

Why dominant males experiencing intense sperm competition sometimes show low investments in sperm production is not always obvious. One well-documented example is that of the external fertilizing teleost, the Arctic charr (Salvelinus alpinus), where individuals becoming dominant reduce sperm product...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Torvald Blikra Egeland, Geir Rudolfsen, Jarle Tryti Nordeide, Ivar Folstad
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2016-11-01
Series:Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fevo.2016.00135/full
_version_ 1811220764229107712
author Torvald Blikra Egeland
Geir Rudolfsen
Jarle Tryti Nordeide
Ivar Folstad
author_facet Torvald Blikra Egeland
Geir Rudolfsen
Jarle Tryti Nordeide
Ivar Folstad
author_sort Torvald Blikra Egeland
collection DOAJ
description Why dominant males experiencing intense sperm competition sometimes show low investments in sperm production is not always obvious. One well-documented example is that of the external fertilizing teleost, the Arctic charr (Salvelinus alpinus), where individuals becoming dominant reduce sperm production and sperm swimming speed in water compared to subordinates. Here we report how ovarian fluid differentially influences sperm velocity of dominant and subordinate male Arctic charr. That is, sperm from dominant males increase their velocity in water diluted ovarian fluid compared to that observed in water, while sperm from subordinates, on the other hand, decrease velocity in ovarian fluid compared to that observed in water. Thus, subordinates, who invest more resources in their sperm and usually show the highest sperm velocity in water, have lower gains from their investment than dominant males when sperm are swimming in ovarian fluid. In sum, our result suggests that ovarian fluid increase sperm velocity more in dominant males than in subordinate males. Although this finding could partly be caused by cryptic female choice exerted by the ovarian fluid for sperm from dominant males, an alternative and more parsimonious explanation is that sperm from dominant males may simply be better designed for swimming in ovarian fluid compared to sperm from subordinate males. Thus, sperm production in the two reproductive roles seems to be adaptively tailored to different external environments.
first_indexed 2024-04-12T07:47:02Z
format Article
id doaj.art-c10f6a0ed4a244efb92052039452e790
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2296-701X
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T07:47:02Z
publishDate 2016-11-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
spelling doaj.art-c10f6a0ed4a244efb92052039452e7902022-12-22T03:41:41ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution2296-701X2016-11-01410.3389/fevo.2016.00135220431Status specific tailoring of sperm behavior in an external fertilizerTorvald Blikra Egeland0Geir Rudolfsen1Jarle Tryti Nordeide2Ivar Folstad3Nord UniversityUniversity of TromsøNord UniversityUniversity of TromsøWhy dominant males experiencing intense sperm competition sometimes show low investments in sperm production is not always obvious. One well-documented example is that of the external fertilizing teleost, the Arctic charr (Salvelinus alpinus), where individuals becoming dominant reduce sperm production and sperm swimming speed in water compared to subordinates. Here we report how ovarian fluid differentially influences sperm velocity of dominant and subordinate male Arctic charr. That is, sperm from dominant males increase their velocity in water diluted ovarian fluid compared to that observed in water, while sperm from subordinates, on the other hand, decrease velocity in ovarian fluid compared to that observed in water. Thus, subordinates, who invest more resources in their sperm and usually show the highest sperm velocity in water, have lower gains from their investment than dominant males when sperm are swimming in ovarian fluid. In sum, our result suggests that ovarian fluid increase sperm velocity more in dominant males than in subordinate males. Although this finding could partly be caused by cryptic female choice exerted by the ovarian fluid for sperm from dominant males, an alternative and more parsimonious explanation is that sperm from dominant males may simply be better designed for swimming in ovarian fluid compared to sperm from subordinate males. Thus, sperm production in the two reproductive roles seems to be adaptively tailored to different external environments.http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fevo.2016.00135/fullSexual selectionsperm competitionCryptic female choiceSperm selectionOvarian fluid
spellingShingle Torvald Blikra Egeland
Geir Rudolfsen
Jarle Tryti Nordeide
Ivar Folstad
Status specific tailoring of sperm behavior in an external fertilizer
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
Sexual selection
sperm competition
Cryptic female choice
Sperm selection
Ovarian fluid
title Status specific tailoring of sperm behavior in an external fertilizer
title_full Status specific tailoring of sperm behavior in an external fertilizer
title_fullStr Status specific tailoring of sperm behavior in an external fertilizer
title_full_unstemmed Status specific tailoring of sperm behavior in an external fertilizer
title_short Status specific tailoring of sperm behavior in an external fertilizer
title_sort status specific tailoring of sperm behavior in an external fertilizer
topic Sexual selection
sperm competition
Cryptic female choice
Sperm selection
Ovarian fluid
url http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fevo.2016.00135/full
work_keys_str_mv AT torvaldblikraegeland statusspecifictailoringofspermbehaviorinanexternalfertilizer
AT geirrudolfsen statusspecifictailoringofspermbehaviorinanexternalfertilizer
AT jarletrytinordeide statusspecifictailoringofspermbehaviorinanexternalfertilizer
AT ivarfolstad statusspecifictailoringofspermbehaviorinanexternalfertilizer