Using democracy to award research funding: an observational study
Abstract Background Winning funding for health and medical research usually involves a lengthy application process. With success rates under 20%, much of the time spent by 80% of applicants could have been better used on actual research. An alternative funding system that could save time is using de...
Main Authors: | Adrian G. Barnett, Philip Clarke, Cedryck Vaquette, Nicholas Graves |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2017-09-01
|
Series: | Research Integrity and Peer Review |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s41073-017-0040-0 |
Similar Items
-
Meta-research: justifying career disruption in funding applications, a survey of Australian researchers
by: Adrian Barnett, et al.
Published: (2022-04-01) -
Strengthening the incentives for responsible research practices in Australian health and medical research funding
by: Joanna Diong, et al.
Published: (2021-08-01) -
Funding opportunities for higher learning, medical and nursing research in India: An overview
by: Ranjana Verma, et al.
Published: (2022-01-01) -
Three years of quality assurance data assessing the performance of over 4000 grant peer review contributions to the Canadian Institutes of Health Research Project Grant Competition
by: Clare L. Ardern, et al.
Published: (2023-01-01) -
Blinding reduces institutional prestige bias during initial review of applications for a young investigator award
by: Anne E Hultgren, et al.
Published: (2024-03-01)