Averaging rotational landmarks during total knee arthroplasty reduces component malrotation caused by femoral asymmetry

Abstract Background Femoral component malrotation is a common cause of patient dissatisfaction after total knee arthroplasty. The sulcus line (SL) is more accurate than Whiteside’s line as it corrects for variation in the coronal orientation of the groove. The hypothesis is that averaging the SL and...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Tat Woon Chao, Liam Geraghty, Pandelis Dimitriou, Simon Talbot
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2017-05-01
Series:Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13018-017-0575-2
_version_ 1818039156539916288
author Tat Woon Chao
Liam Geraghty
Pandelis Dimitriou
Simon Talbot
author_facet Tat Woon Chao
Liam Geraghty
Pandelis Dimitriou
Simon Talbot
author_sort Tat Woon Chao
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Femoral component malrotation is a common cause of patient dissatisfaction after total knee arthroplasty. The sulcus line (SL) is more accurate than Whiteside’s line as it corrects for variation in the coronal orientation of the groove. The hypothesis is that averaging the SL and posterior condylar axis (PCA) will reduce femoral malrotation. Methods The component was inserted at a position between the SL and PCA in 91 patients. An intraoperative photograph was taken showing the landmarks. These were compared to the component position achieved relative to the surgical epicondylar axis (SEA) on a postoperative CT scan. The component position was compared to the position achieved using the individual landmarks. Results Relative to the SEA, the final component position was 0.6° (SD 1.4°, range −3.8° to +4.0°), the coronally corrected SL position was −0.7° (SD 2.3°, −5.5° to +4.6°), the PCA position was 0.9° (SD 1.9°, −6.1° to +5.0°). Averaging the landmarks significantly decreased the variance of the component position compared to using the SL and PCA individually. The number of outliers (>3° from SEA) was also significantly less (p < 0.05) for the average position (2/84) when each was compared to the SL (16/84) and PCA (14/84) individually. In 21/84 (25%) of cases, there was more than 4° of divergence between the SL and PCA. Conclusions Averaging the SL and the PCA decreases femoral component malrotation. Femora are frequently asymmetrical in the axial plane. Referencing posterior condyles alone to set rotation is likely to cause high rates of patellofemoral malalignment.
first_indexed 2024-12-10T07:54:09Z
format Article
id doaj.art-c133f131206d49f9b5526c4c356406a7
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1749-799X
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-10T07:54:09Z
publishDate 2017-05-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
spelling doaj.art-c133f131206d49f9b5526c4c356406a72022-12-22T01:56:57ZengBMCJournal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research1749-799X2017-05-011211910.1186/s13018-017-0575-2Averaging rotational landmarks during total knee arthroplasty reduces component malrotation caused by femoral asymmetryTat Woon Chao0Liam Geraghty1Pandelis Dimitriou2Simon Talbot3Department of Orthopaedics, Western HealthDepartment of Orthopaedics, Western HealthDepartment of Orthopaedics, Western HealthDepartment of Orthopaedics, Western HealthAbstract Background Femoral component malrotation is a common cause of patient dissatisfaction after total knee arthroplasty. The sulcus line (SL) is more accurate than Whiteside’s line as it corrects for variation in the coronal orientation of the groove. The hypothesis is that averaging the SL and posterior condylar axis (PCA) will reduce femoral malrotation. Methods The component was inserted at a position between the SL and PCA in 91 patients. An intraoperative photograph was taken showing the landmarks. These were compared to the component position achieved relative to the surgical epicondylar axis (SEA) on a postoperative CT scan. The component position was compared to the position achieved using the individual landmarks. Results Relative to the SEA, the final component position was 0.6° (SD 1.4°, range −3.8° to +4.0°), the coronally corrected SL position was −0.7° (SD 2.3°, −5.5° to +4.6°), the PCA position was 0.9° (SD 1.9°, −6.1° to +5.0°). Averaging the landmarks significantly decreased the variance of the component position compared to using the SL and PCA individually. The number of outliers (>3° from SEA) was also significantly less (p < 0.05) for the average position (2/84) when each was compared to the SL (16/84) and PCA (14/84) individually. In 21/84 (25%) of cases, there was more than 4° of divergence between the SL and PCA. Conclusions Averaging the SL and the PCA decreases femoral component malrotation. Femora are frequently asymmetrical in the axial plane. Referencing posterior condyles alone to set rotation is likely to cause high rates of patellofemoral malalignment.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13018-017-0575-2KneeArthroplastyMalrotationProsthesisFemoral rotationWhiteside’s line
spellingShingle Tat Woon Chao
Liam Geraghty
Pandelis Dimitriou
Simon Talbot
Averaging rotational landmarks during total knee arthroplasty reduces component malrotation caused by femoral asymmetry
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
Knee
Arthroplasty
Malrotation
Prosthesis
Femoral rotation
Whiteside’s line
title Averaging rotational landmarks during total knee arthroplasty reduces component malrotation caused by femoral asymmetry
title_full Averaging rotational landmarks during total knee arthroplasty reduces component malrotation caused by femoral asymmetry
title_fullStr Averaging rotational landmarks during total knee arthroplasty reduces component malrotation caused by femoral asymmetry
title_full_unstemmed Averaging rotational landmarks during total knee arthroplasty reduces component malrotation caused by femoral asymmetry
title_short Averaging rotational landmarks during total knee arthroplasty reduces component malrotation caused by femoral asymmetry
title_sort averaging rotational landmarks during total knee arthroplasty reduces component malrotation caused by femoral asymmetry
topic Knee
Arthroplasty
Malrotation
Prosthesis
Femoral rotation
Whiteside’s line
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13018-017-0575-2
work_keys_str_mv AT tatwoonchao averagingrotationallandmarksduringtotalkneearthroplastyreducescomponentmalrotationcausedbyfemoralasymmetry
AT liamgeraghty averagingrotationallandmarksduringtotalkneearthroplastyreducescomponentmalrotationcausedbyfemoralasymmetry
AT pandelisdimitriou averagingrotationallandmarksduringtotalkneearthroplastyreducescomponentmalrotationcausedbyfemoralasymmetry
AT simontalbot averagingrotationallandmarksduringtotalkneearthroplastyreducescomponentmalrotationcausedbyfemoralasymmetry