Comparison of metabolic outcomes in patients undergoing laparoscopic roux-en-Y gastric bypass versus sleeve gastrectomy – a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Bariatric surgery is the most effective treatment for morbid obesity and is known to have beneficial effects on glycaemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and in diabetes prevention. The preferred type of surgery and mechanism of action i...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Christelle Hayoz, Thierry Hermann, Dimitri Aristotle Raptis, Alain Brönnimann, Ralph Peterli, Markus Zuber
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SMW supporting association (Trägerverein Swiss Medical Weekly SMW) 2018-07-01
Series:Swiss Medical Weekly
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.smw.ch/index.php/smw/article/view/2488
_version_ 1811289188903944192
author Christelle Hayoz
Thierry Hermann
Dimitri Aristotle Raptis
Alain Brönnimann
Ralph Peterli
Markus Zuber
author_facet Christelle Hayoz
Thierry Hermann
Dimitri Aristotle Raptis
Alain Brönnimann
Ralph Peterli
Markus Zuber
author_sort Christelle Hayoz
collection DOAJ
description BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Bariatric surgery is the most effective treatment for morbid obesity and is known to have beneficial effects on glycaemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and in diabetes prevention. The preferred type of surgery and mechanism of action is, however, unclear. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the effects of laparoscopic roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) with those of sleeve gastrectomy (SG) on metabolic outcome, with a special focus on glycaemic control. METHODS A literature search of the Medline, Pubmed, Cochrane, Embase and SCOPUS databases was performed in November 2014 for RCTs comparing RYGB with SG in overweight and obese patients with or without T2DM. The primary outcome was improvement in postoperative glycaemic control. Secondary outcomes included weight-related and lipid metabolism parameters. Synthesis of these data followed established statistical procedures for meta-analysis. RESULTS Sixteen RCTs with a total of 1132 patients with overweight or obesity were included in the analysis. When compared with patients who underwent SG, those who underwent RYGB showed no difference after 12 months in mean fasting blood glucose (mean difference [MD] −6.22 mg/dl, 95% confidence interval [CI] −17.27 to 4.83; p <0.001). However, there was a better outcome with RYGB, with lower mean fasting glucose levels at 24 months (MD −16.92 mg/dl, 95% CI −21.67 to −12.18), 36 months (MD −5.97mg/dl, 95% CI −9.32 to −2.62) and at 52 months (MD −15.20 mg/dl, 95% CI −27.35 to −3.05) mg/dl; p = 0.010) and lower mean glycated haemoglobin (HbA1 at 12 months (MD −0.47%, 95% CI −0.73 to −0.20%; p <0.001) and at 36 months postoperatively compared to SG. Fasting insulin levels and HOMA indices showed no difference at any stage of follow-up. In the subgroup including only diabetic patients HbA1c showed lower levels at 12 months (MD −0.46%, 95% CI−0.73 to −0.20%). No difference was found for the fasting insulin at baseline and after 12 months. Similarly, when compared to SG, patients that underwent RYGB had lower low-density lipoproteins at 12 months. This effect was lost at 36 months. Patients undergoing RYGB also had lower triglycerides at 12 months and at 52 months, lower cholesterol at 60 months and an improvement of BMI at 52 months postoperatively. BMI values at 12 months and low-density lipoprotein levels at 12 and 36 months were lower for diabetic patients only, as in the overall analysis. CONCLUSION Based on this meta-analysis, RYGB is more effective than SG in improving weight loss and short- and mid-term glycaemic and lipid metabolism control in patients with and without T2DM. Therefore, unless contraindicated, RYGB should be the first choice to treat patients with obesity and T2DM and/or dyslipidaemia.
first_indexed 2024-04-13T03:50:29Z
format Article
id doaj.art-c1598e637ac44978b563e8131716ce4a
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1424-3997
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T03:50:29Z
publishDate 2018-07-01
publisher SMW supporting association (Trägerverein Swiss Medical Weekly SMW)
record_format Article
series Swiss Medical Weekly
spelling doaj.art-c1598e637ac44978b563e8131716ce4a2022-12-22T03:03:50ZengSMW supporting association (Trägerverein Swiss Medical Weekly SMW)Swiss Medical Weekly1424-39972018-07-01148272810.57187/smw.2018.14633Comparison of metabolic outcomes in patients undergoing laparoscopic roux-en-Y gastric bypass versus sleeve gastrectomy – a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trialsChristelle Hayoz0Thierry Hermann1Dimitri Aristotle Raptis2Alain Brönnimann3Ralph Peterli4Markus Zuber5Department of Surgery, Cantonal Hospital Olten, SwitzerlandDepartment of Surgery, Cantonal Hospital Olten, SwitzerlandDepartment of Surgery, Cantonal Hospital Olten, Switzerland; Department of Surgery and Transplantation, University Hospital Zurich, SwitzerlandDepartment of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Cantonal Hospital Olten, SwitzerlandDepartment of Surgery, St. Claraspital, Basel, SwitzerlandDepartment of Surgery, Cantonal Hospital Olten, Switzerland BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Bariatric surgery is the most effective treatment for morbid obesity and is known to have beneficial effects on glycaemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and in diabetes prevention. The preferred type of surgery and mechanism of action is, however, unclear. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the effects of laparoscopic roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) with those of sleeve gastrectomy (SG) on metabolic outcome, with a special focus on glycaemic control. METHODS A literature search of the Medline, Pubmed, Cochrane, Embase and SCOPUS databases was performed in November 2014 for RCTs comparing RYGB with SG in overweight and obese patients with or without T2DM. The primary outcome was improvement in postoperative glycaemic control. Secondary outcomes included weight-related and lipid metabolism parameters. Synthesis of these data followed established statistical procedures for meta-analysis. RESULTS Sixteen RCTs with a total of 1132 patients with overweight or obesity were included in the analysis. When compared with patients who underwent SG, those who underwent RYGB showed no difference after 12 months in mean fasting blood glucose (mean difference [MD] −6.22 mg/dl, 95% confidence interval [CI] −17.27 to 4.83; p <0.001). However, there was a better outcome with RYGB, with lower mean fasting glucose levels at 24 months (MD −16.92 mg/dl, 95% CI −21.67 to −12.18), 36 months (MD −5.97mg/dl, 95% CI −9.32 to −2.62) and at 52 months (MD −15.20 mg/dl, 95% CI −27.35 to −3.05) mg/dl; p = 0.010) and lower mean glycated haemoglobin (HbA1 at 12 months (MD −0.47%, 95% CI −0.73 to −0.20%; p <0.001) and at 36 months postoperatively compared to SG. Fasting insulin levels and HOMA indices showed no difference at any stage of follow-up. In the subgroup including only diabetic patients HbA1c showed lower levels at 12 months (MD −0.46%, 95% CI−0.73 to −0.20%). No difference was found for the fasting insulin at baseline and after 12 months. Similarly, when compared to SG, patients that underwent RYGB had lower low-density lipoproteins at 12 months. This effect was lost at 36 months. Patients undergoing RYGB also had lower triglycerides at 12 months and at 52 months, lower cholesterol at 60 months and an improvement of BMI at 52 months postoperatively. BMI values at 12 months and low-density lipoprotein levels at 12 and 36 months were lower for diabetic patients only, as in the overall analysis. CONCLUSION Based on this meta-analysis, RYGB is more effective than SG in improving weight loss and short- and mid-term glycaemic and lipid metabolism control in patients with and without T2DM. Therefore, unless contraindicated, RYGB should be the first choice to treat patients with obesity and T2DM and/or dyslipidaemia. https://www.smw.ch/index.php/smw/article/view/2488gastric bypasssleeve gastrectomyglycaemic controlobesity
spellingShingle Christelle Hayoz
Thierry Hermann
Dimitri Aristotle Raptis
Alain Brönnimann
Ralph Peterli
Markus Zuber
Comparison of metabolic outcomes in patients undergoing laparoscopic roux-en-Y gastric bypass versus sleeve gastrectomy – a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
Swiss Medical Weekly
gastric bypass
sleeve gastrectomy
glycaemic control
obesity
title Comparison of metabolic outcomes in patients undergoing laparoscopic roux-en-Y gastric bypass versus sleeve gastrectomy – a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
title_full Comparison of metabolic outcomes in patients undergoing laparoscopic roux-en-Y gastric bypass versus sleeve gastrectomy – a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
title_fullStr Comparison of metabolic outcomes in patients undergoing laparoscopic roux-en-Y gastric bypass versus sleeve gastrectomy – a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of metabolic outcomes in patients undergoing laparoscopic roux-en-Y gastric bypass versus sleeve gastrectomy – a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
title_short Comparison of metabolic outcomes in patients undergoing laparoscopic roux-en-Y gastric bypass versus sleeve gastrectomy – a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
title_sort comparison of metabolic outcomes in patients undergoing laparoscopic roux en y gastric bypass versus sleeve gastrectomy a systematic review and meta analysis of randomised controlled trials
topic gastric bypass
sleeve gastrectomy
glycaemic control
obesity
url https://www.smw.ch/index.php/smw/article/view/2488
work_keys_str_mv AT christellehayoz comparisonofmetabolicoutcomesinpatientsundergoinglaparoscopicrouxenygastricbypassversussleevegastrectomyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomisedcontrolledtrials
AT thierryhermann comparisonofmetabolicoutcomesinpatientsundergoinglaparoscopicrouxenygastricbypassversussleevegastrectomyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomisedcontrolledtrials
AT dimitriaristotleraptis comparisonofmetabolicoutcomesinpatientsundergoinglaparoscopicrouxenygastricbypassversussleevegastrectomyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomisedcontrolledtrials
AT alainbronnimann comparisonofmetabolicoutcomesinpatientsundergoinglaparoscopicrouxenygastricbypassversussleevegastrectomyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomisedcontrolledtrials
AT ralphpeterli comparisonofmetabolicoutcomesinpatientsundergoinglaparoscopicrouxenygastricbypassversussleevegastrectomyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomisedcontrolledtrials
AT markuszuber comparisonofmetabolicoutcomesinpatientsundergoinglaparoscopicrouxenygastricbypassversussleevegastrectomyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomisedcontrolledtrials