Ductal prostate cancer: Clinical features and outcomes from a multicenter retrospective analysis and overview of the current literature
Abstract. Objective. The aim of the study is to evaluate clinical features and outcomes after different therapeutic strategies for ductal prostate adenocarcinoma (DPC), a rare but aggressive subtype of invasive prostate cancer (PCa) accounting for, in the pure and mixed form, 1% or less and 5% or le...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wolters Kluwer Health
2022-12-01
|
Series: | Current Urology |
Online Access: | http://journals.lww.com/10.1097/CU9.0000000000000118 |
_version_ | 1797945072229023744 |
---|---|
author | Salvatore Cozzi Lilia Bardoscia Masoumeh Najafi Sefik Igdem Luca Triggiani Stefano Maria Magrini Andrea Botti Ferran Guedea Laura Melocchi Patrizia Ciammella Cinzia Iotti Cristina Gutierrez |
author_facet | Salvatore Cozzi Lilia Bardoscia Masoumeh Najafi Sefik Igdem Luca Triggiani Stefano Maria Magrini Andrea Botti Ferran Guedea Laura Melocchi Patrizia Ciammella Cinzia Iotti Cristina Gutierrez |
author_sort | Salvatore Cozzi |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Abstract. Objective. The aim of the study is to evaluate clinical features and outcomes after different therapeutic strategies for ductal prostate adenocarcinoma (DPC), a rare but aggressive subtype of invasive prostate cancer (PCa) accounting for, in the pure and mixed form, 1% or less and 5% or less, respectively, of all the newly diagnosed PCa.
Materials and methods. Patients with a proven diagnosis of DPC undergoing surgery, radiotherapy, and androgen deprivation therapy, alone or in combination, were considered for this multicenter, retrospective study. The study assessed overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and age-related disease-specific survival.
Results. Eighty-one patients met the study inclusion criteria. Pure DPC was found in 29 patients (36%) and mixed ductal-acinar-PCa in 52 patients (64%). After a median follow-up of 63 months (range, 3–206 months), 3- and 5-year OS rates were 84% and 67%, respectively, and 3- and 5-year DFS rates were 54% and 34%, respectively. There were no significant differences in OS or DFS between the pure and mixed DPC groups. Pure DPC was associated with a higher rate of metastatic disease at onset. Patients 74 years or younger had better disease-specific survival (p=0.0019). A subgroup analysis favored radiotherapy as the primary treatment for nonmetastatic, organ-confined DPC (3- and 5-year DFS of 80% and 50%, respectively, compared with 5-year DFS of 35% for surgical patients; p = 0.023).
Conclusions. Our study found DPC to be rarer, more aggressive, more likely to metastasize, and have a worse prognosis than the common acinar variant, especially in its pure form. Multicenter series are encouraged to obtain large data sets, or propensity score matching analyses with patients with conventional PCa are desirable to understand the best therapeutic approach and improve outcomes. |
first_indexed | 2024-04-10T20:48:25Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-c15a6f98b3794413a44182164cb0a30d |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 1661-7649 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-04-10T20:48:25Z |
publishDate | 2022-12-01 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer Health |
record_format | Article |
series | Current Urology |
spelling | doaj.art-c15a6f98b3794413a44182164cb0a30d2023-01-24T00:57:27ZengWolters Kluwer HealthCurrent Urology1661-76492022-12-0116421822610.1097/CU9.0000000000000118202212000-00005Ductal prostate cancer: Clinical features and outcomes from a multicenter retrospective analysis and overview of the current literatureSalvatore Cozzi0Lilia Bardoscia1Masoumeh Najafi2Sefik Igdem3Luca Triggiani4Stefano Maria Magrini5Andrea Botti6Ferran Guedea7Laura Melocchi8Patrizia Ciammella9Cinzia Iotti10Cristina Gutierrez11a Department of Radiation Oncology, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italyb Department of Radiation Oncology, S. Luca Hospital, Healthcare Company Tuscany Northwest, Lucca, Italyc Department of Radiation Oncology Shohadaye Haft-e-Tir Hospital, Iran University of Medical Science, Teheran, Irand Department of Radiation Oncology, Istanbul Bilim University, Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkeye Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Brescia and Spedali Civili Hospital, Brescia, Italye Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Brescia and Spedali Civili Hospital, Brescia, Italyf Department of Medical Physics, Azienda AUSL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italyg Department of Radiation Oncology, Catalan Institute of Oncology, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spainh Department of Pathology, Fondazione Poliambulanza Hospital, Brescia, Italya Department of Radiation Oncology, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italya Department of Radiation Oncology, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italyg Department of Radiation Oncology, Catalan Institute of Oncology, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, SpainAbstract. Objective. The aim of the study is to evaluate clinical features and outcomes after different therapeutic strategies for ductal prostate adenocarcinoma (DPC), a rare but aggressive subtype of invasive prostate cancer (PCa) accounting for, in the pure and mixed form, 1% or less and 5% or less, respectively, of all the newly diagnosed PCa. Materials and methods. Patients with a proven diagnosis of DPC undergoing surgery, radiotherapy, and androgen deprivation therapy, alone or in combination, were considered for this multicenter, retrospective study. The study assessed overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and age-related disease-specific survival. Results. Eighty-one patients met the study inclusion criteria. Pure DPC was found in 29 patients (36%) and mixed ductal-acinar-PCa in 52 patients (64%). After a median follow-up of 63 months (range, 3–206 months), 3- and 5-year OS rates were 84% and 67%, respectively, and 3- and 5-year DFS rates were 54% and 34%, respectively. There were no significant differences in OS or DFS between the pure and mixed DPC groups. Pure DPC was associated with a higher rate of metastatic disease at onset. Patients 74 years or younger had better disease-specific survival (p=0.0019). A subgroup analysis favored radiotherapy as the primary treatment for nonmetastatic, organ-confined DPC (3- and 5-year DFS of 80% and 50%, respectively, compared with 5-year DFS of 35% for surgical patients; p = 0.023). Conclusions. Our study found DPC to be rarer, more aggressive, more likely to metastasize, and have a worse prognosis than the common acinar variant, especially in its pure form. Multicenter series are encouraged to obtain large data sets, or propensity score matching analyses with patients with conventional PCa are desirable to understand the best therapeutic approach and improve outcomes.http://journals.lww.com/10.1097/CU9.0000000000000118 |
spellingShingle | Salvatore Cozzi Lilia Bardoscia Masoumeh Najafi Sefik Igdem Luca Triggiani Stefano Maria Magrini Andrea Botti Ferran Guedea Laura Melocchi Patrizia Ciammella Cinzia Iotti Cristina Gutierrez Ductal prostate cancer: Clinical features and outcomes from a multicenter retrospective analysis and overview of the current literature Current Urology |
title | Ductal prostate cancer: Clinical features and outcomes from a multicenter retrospective analysis and overview of the current literature |
title_full | Ductal prostate cancer: Clinical features and outcomes from a multicenter retrospective analysis and overview of the current literature |
title_fullStr | Ductal prostate cancer: Clinical features and outcomes from a multicenter retrospective analysis and overview of the current literature |
title_full_unstemmed | Ductal prostate cancer: Clinical features and outcomes from a multicenter retrospective analysis and overview of the current literature |
title_short | Ductal prostate cancer: Clinical features and outcomes from a multicenter retrospective analysis and overview of the current literature |
title_sort | ductal prostate cancer clinical features and outcomes from a multicenter retrospective analysis and overview of the current literature |
url | http://journals.lww.com/10.1097/CU9.0000000000000118 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT salvatorecozzi ductalprostatecancerclinicalfeaturesandoutcomesfromamulticenterretrospectiveanalysisandoverviewofthecurrentliterature AT liliabardoscia ductalprostatecancerclinicalfeaturesandoutcomesfromamulticenterretrospectiveanalysisandoverviewofthecurrentliterature AT masoumehnajafi ductalprostatecancerclinicalfeaturesandoutcomesfromamulticenterretrospectiveanalysisandoverviewofthecurrentliterature AT sefikigdem ductalprostatecancerclinicalfeaturesandoutcomesfromamulticenterretrospectiveanalysisandoverviewofthecurrentliterature AT lucatriggiani ductalprostatecancerclinicalfeaturesandoutcomesfromamulticenterretrospectiveanalysisandoverviewofthecurrentliterature AT stefanomariamagrini ductalprostatecancerclinicalfeaturesandoutcomesfromamulticenterretrospectiveanalysisandoverviewofthecurrentliterature AT andreabotti ductalprostatecancerclinicalfeaturesandoutcomesfromamulticenterretrospectiveanalysisandoverviewofthecurrentliterature AT ferranguedea ductalprostatecancerclinicalfeaturesandoutcomesfromamulticenterretrospectiveanalysisandoverviewofthecurrentliterature AT lauramelocchi ductalprostatecancerclinicalfeaturesandoutcomesfromamulticenterretrospectiveanalysisandoverviewofthecurrentliterature AT patriziaciammella ductalprostatecancerclinicalfeaturesandoutcomesfromamulticenterretrospectiveanalysisandoverviewofthecurrentliterature AT cinziaiotti ductalprostatecancerclinicalfeaturesandoutcomesfromamulticenterretrospectiveanalysisandoverviewofthecurrentliterature AT cristinagutierrez ductalprostatecancerclinicalfeaturesandoutcomesfromamulticenterretrospectiveanalysisandoverviewofthecurrentliterature |