Forced Expiratory Flow (FEF25–75%) as a Clinical Endpoint in Children and Adolescents with Symptomatic Asthma Receiving Tiotropium: A Post Hoc Analysis

Abstract Introduction In pediatric patients with asthma, measurements of forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) may be normal or may not correlate with symptom severity. Forced expiratory flow at 25–75% of the vital capacity (FEF25–75%) is a potentially more sensitive parameter for assessing periphe...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Stanley J. Szefler, Stanley Goldstein, Christian Vogelberg, George W. Bensch, John Given, Branko Jugovic, Michael Engel, Petra M. Moroni-Zentgraf, Ralf Sigmund, Eckard H. Hamelmann
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Adis, Springer Healthcare 2020-05-01
Series:Pulmonary Therapy
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1007/s41030-020-00117-6
_version_ 1818649594563657728
author Stanley J. Szefler
Stanley Goldstein
Christian Vogelberg
George W. Bensch
John Given
Branko Jugovic
Michael Engel
Petra M. Moroni-Zentgraf
Ralf Sigmund
Eckard H. Hamelmann
author_facet Stanley J. Szefler
Stanley Goldstein
Christian Vogelberg
George W. Bensch
John Given
Branko Jugovic
Michael Engel
Petra M. Moroni-Zentgraf
Ralf Sigmund
Eckard H. Hamelmann
author_sort Stanley J. Szefler
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Introduction In pediatric patients with asthma, measurements of forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) may be normal or may not correlate with symptom severity. Forced expiratory flow at 25–75% of the vital capacity (FEF25–75%) is a potentially more sensitive parameter for assessing peripheral airway function. This post hoc analysis compared FEF25–75% with FEV1 as an endpoint to assess bronchodilator responsiveness in children with asthma. Methods Change from baseline in trough FEF25–75% and trough FEV1 following treatment with either tiotropium (5 µg or 2.5 µg) or placebo Respimat® was analyzed in four phase III trials in children (aged 6–11 years) and adolescents (aged 12–17 years) with symptomatic moderate (VivaTinA-asthma® and PensieTinA-asthma®) and mild (CanoTinA-asthma® and RubaTinA-asthma®) asthma. Data from all treatment arms were pooled and correlations between FEF25–75% and FEV1 were calculated and analyzed. Results A total of 1590 patients were included in the analysis. Tiotropium Respimat® consistently improved FEF25–75% and FEV1 versus placebo, although in adolescents with severe asthma, the observed improvements were not statistically significant. Improvements in FEF25–75% response with tiotropium versus placebo were largely more pronounced than improvements in FEV1. Statistical assessment of the correlation of FEV1 and FEF25–75% showed moderate-to-high correlations (Pearson’s correlation coefficients 0.73–0.80). Conclusions In pediatric patients, FEF25–75% may be a more sensitive measure to detect treatment response, certainly to tiotropium, than FEV1 and should be evaluated as an additional lung function measurement.
first_indexed 2024-12-17T01:36:48Z
format Article
id doaj.art-c1669d47183840dca03f463fcc3eb098
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2364-1754
2364-1746
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-17T01:36:48Z
publishDate 2020-05-01
publisher Adis, Springer Healthcare
record_format Article
series Pulmonary Therapy
spelling doaj.art-c1669d47183840dca03f463fcc3eb0982022-12-21T22:08:26ZengAdis, Springer HealthcarePulmonary Therapy2364-17542364-17462020-05-016215115810.1007/s41030-020-00117-6Forced Expiratory Flow (FEF25–75%) as a Clinical Endpoint in Children and Adolescents with Symptomatic Asthma Receiving Tiotropium: A Post Hoc AnalysisStanley J. Szefler0Stanley Goldstein1Christian Vogelberg2George W. Bensch3John Given4Branko Jugovic5Michael Engel6Petra M. Moroni-Zentgraf7Ralf Sigmund8Eckard H. Hamelmann9Department of Pediatrics, The Breathing Institute, Children’s Hospital of Colorado, University of Colorado School of MedicineAllergy and Asthma Care of Long IslandUniversity Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technical University of DresdenAllergy, Immunology and Asthma Medical Group, Inc.Allergy and Respiratory CenterTA Respiratory Diseases/Biosimilars Medicine, Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbHTA Respiratory Diseases/Biosimilars Medicine, Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbHBoehringer Ingelheim Pty LtdGlobal Biometrics and Data Sciences, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co. KG.Klinik für Kinder- Und Jugendmedizin, Kinderzentrum Bethel, Evangelisches Klinikum Bethel EvKBAbstract Introduction In pediatric patients with asthma, measurements of forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) may be normal or may not correlate with symptom severity. Forced expiratory flow at 25–75% of the vital capacity (FEF25–75%) is a potentially more sensitive parameter for assessing peripheral airway function. This post hoc analysis compared FEF25–75% with FEV1 as an endpoint to assess bronchodilator responsiveness in children with asthma. Methods Change from baseline in trough FEF25–75% and trough FEV1 following treatment with either tiotropium (5 µg or 2.5 µg) or placebo Respimat® was analyzed in four phase III trials in children (aged 6–11 years) and adolescents (aged 12–17 years) with symptomatic moderate (VivaTinA-asthma® and PensieTinA-asthma®) and mild (CanoTinA-asthma® and RubaTinA-asthma®) asthma. Data from all treatment arms were pooled and correlations between FEF25–75% and FEV1 were calculated and analyzed. Results A total of 1590 patients were included in the analysis. Tiotropium Respimat® consistently improved FEF25–75% and FEV1 versus placebo, although in adolescents with severe asthma, the observed improvements were not statistically significant. Improvements in FEF25–75% response with tiotropium versus placebo were largely more pronounced than improvements in FEV1. Statistical assessment of the correlation of FEV1 and FEF25–75% showed moderate-to-high correlations (Pearson’s correlation coefficients 0.73–0.80). Conclusions In pediatric patients, FEF25–75% may be a more sensitive measure to detect treatment response, certainly to tiotropium, than FEV1 and should be evaluated as an additional lung function measurement.https://doi.org/10.1007/s41030-020-00117-6Airway obstructionAsthmaMuscarinic antagonistTiotropium
spellingShingle Stanley J. Szefler
Stanley Goldstein
Christian Vogelberg
George W. Bensch
John Given
Branko Jugovic
Michael Engel
Petra M. Moroni-Zentgraf
Ralf Sigmund
Eckard H. Hamelmann
Forced Expiratory Flow (FEF25–75%) as a Clinical Endpoint in Children and Adolescents with Symptomatic Asthma Receiving Tiotropium: A Post Hoc Analysis
Pulmonary Therapy
Airway obstruction
Asthma
Muscarinic antagonist
Tiotropium
title Forced Expiratory Flow (FEF25–75%) as a Clinical Endpoint in Children and Adolescents with Symptomatic Asthma Receiving Tiotropium: A Post Hoc Analysis
title_full Forced Expiratory Flow (FEF25–75%) as a Clinical Endpoint in Children and Adolescents with Symptomatic Asthma Receiving Tiotropium: A Post Hoc Analysis
title_fullStr Forced Expiratory Flow (FEF25–75%) as a Clinical Endpoint in Children and Adolescents with Symptomatic Asthma Receiving Tiotropium: A Post Hoc Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Forced Expiratory Flow (FEF25–75%) as a Clinical Endpoint in Children and Adolescents with Symptomatic Asthma Receiving Tiotropium: A Post Hoc Analysis
title_short Forced Expiratory Flow (FEF25–75%) as a Clinical Endpoint in Children and Adolescents with Symptomatic Asthma Receiving Tiotropium: A Post Hoc Analysis
title_sort forced expiratory flow fef25 75 as a clinical endpoint in children and adolescents with symptomatic asthma receiving tiotropium a post hoc analysis
topic Airway obstruction
Asthma
Muscarinic antagonist
Tiotropium
url https://doi.org/10.1007/s41030-020-00117-6
work_keys_str_mv AT stanleyjszefler forcedexpiratoryflowfef2575asaclinicalendpointinchildrenandadolescentswithsymptomaticasthmareceivingtiotropiumaposthocanalysis
AT stanleygoldstein forcedexpiratoryflowfef2575asaclinicalendpointinchildrenandadolescentswithsymptomaticasthmareceivingtiotropiumaposthocanalysis
AT christianvogelberg forcedexpiratoryflowfef2575asaclinicalendpointinchildrenandadolescentswithsymptomaticasthmareceivingtiotropiumaposthocanalysis
AT georgewbensch forcedexpiratoryflowfef2575asaclinicalendpointinchildrenandadolescentswithsymptomaticasthmareceivingtiotropiumaposthocanalysis
AT johngiven forcedexpiratoryflowfef2575asaclinicalendpointinchildrenandadolescentswithsymptomaticasthmareceivingtiotropiumaposthocanalysis
AT brankojugovic forcedexpiratoryflowfef2575asaclinicalendpointinchildrenandadolescentswithsymptomaticasthmareceivingtiotropiumaposthocanalysis
AT michaelengel forcedexpiratoryflowfef2575asaclinicalendpointinchildrenandadolescentswithsymptomaticasthmareceivingtiotropiumaposthocanalysis
AT petrammoronizentgraf forcedexpiratoryflowfef2575asaclinicalendpointinchildrenandadolescentswithsymptomaticasthmareceivingtiotropiumaposthocanalysis
AT ralfsigmund forcedexpiratoryflowfef2575asaclinicalendpointinchildrenandadolescentswithsymptomaticasthmareceivingtiotropiumaposthocanalysis
AT eckardhhamelmann forcedexpiratoryflowfef2575asaclinicalendpointinchildrenandadolescentswithsymptomaticasthmareceivingtiotropiumaposthocanalysis