Comparative evaluation of different endodontic access cavity designs with different Burs—An in vitro experimental insight into the aspect of fracture resistance
Introduction: In vitro fracture resistance of extracted mandibular molars treated with various access cavity designs, including traditional endodontic cavity (TradAC), conservative/contracted endodontic cavity (ConsAC), ninja endodontic cavity (UltraAC), truss endodontic cavity (TrussAC), caries-dri...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
2024-01-01
|
| Series: | Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://www.jpbsonline.org/article.asp?issn=0975-7406;year=2024;volume=16;issue=5;spage=821;epage=824;aulast=Langaliya |
| _version_ | 1797222263414587392 |
|---|---|
| author | Akshayraj K Langaliya Girish Parmar Drashti Panchal Jainish Thakkar Jinali Shah Rushvi Patel |
| author_facet | Akshayraj K Langaliya Girish Parmar Drashti Panchal Jainish Thakkar Jinali Shah Rushvi Patel |
| author_sort | Akshayraj K Langaliya |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Introduction: In vitro fracture resistance of extracted mandibular molars treated with various access cavity designs, including traditional endodontic cavity (TradAC), conservative/contracted endodontic cavity (ConsAC), ninja endodontic cavity (UltraAC), truss endodontic cavity (TrussAC), caries-driven access cavity (CariesAC), and intact teeth, is the focus of this study. Materials and Methods: Six groups of 20 mandibular molars, totaling 120, were used in the investigation. While the other five groups underwent various access cavity preparations, chemomechanical preparation, and obturation procedures before being repaired with composite resin, Group 1 was left unaltered (the control). A 6 mm round head tip was used to apply the fracture force, which was measured in newtons, at a crosshead speed of 1 mm/min until fracture developed. Results: According to the current study, the intact control group had the maximum fracture resistance. The access cavity groups' mean values were maximum in CariesAC followed by ConsAC, TrussAC, UltraAC, and TraditonalAC respectively. Conclusion: While among the four minimally invasive designs, CariesAC showed a higher fracture resistance despite the results being statistically insignificant, TradAC had a significantly lower resistance than other conservative access cavity designs. |
| first_indexed | 2024-04-24T13:18:33Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-c1886729467548069f8d4902b1f7d313 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 0975-7406 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-24T13:18:33Z |
| publishDate | 2024-01-01 |
| publisher | Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences |
| spelling | doaj.art-c1886729467548069f8d4902b1f7d3132024-04-04T16:37:41ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsJournal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences0975-74062024-01-0116582182410.4103/jpbs.jpbs_1038_23Comparative evaluation of different endodontic access cavity designs with different Burs—An in vitro experimental insight into the aspect of fracture resistanceAkshayraj K LangaliyaGirish ParmarDrashti PanchalJainish ThakkarJinali ShahRushvi PatelIntroduction: In vitro fracture resistance of extracted mandibular molars treated with various access cavity designs, including traditional endodontic cavity (TradAC), conservative/contracted endodontic cavity (ConsAC), ninja endodontic cavity (UltraAC), truss endodontic cavity (TrussAC), caries-driven access cavity (CariesAC), and intact teeth, is the focus of this study. Materials and Methods: Six groups of 20 mandibular molars, totaling 120, were used in the investigation. While the other five groups underwent various access cavity preparations, chemomechanical preparation, and obturation procedures before being repaired with composite resin, Group 1 was left unaltered (the control). A 6 mm round head tip was used to apply the fracture force, which was measured in newtons, at a crosshead speed of 1 mm/min until fracture developed. Results: According to the current study, the intact control group had the maximum fracture resistance. The access cavity groups' mean values were maximum in CariesAC followed by ConsAC, TrussAC, UltraAC, and TraditonalAC respectively. Conclusion: While among the four minimally invasive designs, CariesAC showed a higher fracture resistance despite the results being statistically insignificant, TradAC had a significantly lower resistance than other conservative access cavity designs.http://www.jpbsonline.org/article.asp?issn=0975-7406;year=2024;volume=16;issue=5;spage=821;epage=824;aulast=Langaliyacaries-driven access cavityconservative endodontic cavityfracture resistanceninja endodontic access cavitytruss endodontic access cavity |
| spellingShingle | Akshayraj K Langaliya Girish Parmar Drashti Panchal Jainish Thakkar Jinali Shah Rushvi Patel Comparative evaluation of different endodontic access cavity designs with different Burs—An in vitro experimental insight into the aspect of fracture resistance Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences caries-driven access cavity conservative endodontic cavity fracture resistance ninja endodontic access cavity truss endodontic access cavity |
| title | Comparative evaluation of different endodontic access cavity designs with different Burs—An in vitro experimental insight into the aspect of fracture resistance |
| title_full | Comparative evaluation of different endodontic access cavity designs with different Burs—An in vitro experimental insight into the aspect of fracture resistance |
| title_fullStr | Comparative evaluation of different endodontic access cavity designs with different Burs—An in vitro experimental insight into the aspect of fracture resistance |
| title_full_unstemmed | Comparative evaluation of different endodontic access cavity designs with different Burs—An in vitro experimental insight into the aspect of fracture resistance |
| title_short | Comparative evaluation of different endodontic access cavity designs with different Burs—An in vitro experimental insight into the aspect of fracture resistance |
| title_sort | comparative evaluation of different endodontic access cavity designs with different burs an in vitro experimental insight into the aspect of fracture resistance |
| topic | caries-driven access cavity conservative endodontic cavity fracture resistance ninja endodontic access cavity truss endodontic access cavity |
| url | http://www.jpbsonline.org/article.asp?issn=0975-7406;year=2024;volume=16;issue=5;spage=821;epage=824;aulast=Langaliya |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT akshayrajklangaliya comparativeevaluationofdifferentendodonticaccesscavitydesignswithdifferentbursaninvitroexperimentalinsightintotheaspectoffractureresistance AT girishparmar comparativeevaluationofdifferentendodonticaccesscavitydesignswithdifferentbursaninvitroexperimentalinsightintotheaspectoffractureresistance AT drashtipanchal comparativeevaluationofdifferentendodonticaccesscavitydesignswithdifferentbursaninvitroexperimentalinsightintotheaspectoffractureresistance AT jainishthakkar comparativeevaluationofdifferentendodonticaccesscavitydesignswithdifferentbursaninvitroexperimentalinsightintotheaspectoffractureresistance AT jinalishah comparativeevaluationofdifferentendodonticaccesscavitydesignswithdifferentbursaninvitroexperimentalinsightintotheaspectoffractureresistance AT rushvipatel comparativeevaluationofdifferentendodonticaccesscavitydesignswithdifferentbursaninvitroexperimentalinsightintotheaspectoffractureresistance |