Inclusive Recruitment Strategies to Maximize Sociodemographic Diversity among Participants: A St. Louis Case Study

Background. Sociodemographically diverse study samples are critical for research related to health decision making. However, not all researchers have the training, capacity, and funding to engage research methods that recruit the most diverse populations. Objective and Methods. We used participant-g...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Chelsey R. Carter, Julia Maki, Nicole Ackermann, Erika A. Waters
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2023-06-01
Series:MDM Policy & Practice
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/23814683231183646
_version_ 1797794315259346944
author Chelsey R. Carter
Julia Maki
Nicole Ackermann
Erika A. Waters
author_facet Chelsey R. Carter
Julia Maki
Nicole Ackermann
Erika A. Waters
author_sort Chelsey R. Carter
collection DOAJ
description Background. Sociodemographically diverse study samples are critical for research related to health decision making. However, not all researchers have the training, capacity, and funding to engage research methods that recruit the most diverse populations. Objective and Methods. We used participant-generated data, staff salary data, and participant observation to examine the effectiveness and cost of strategies that we used for screening, enrolling, and retaining a sociodemographically diverse sample for a risk communication and behavior change randomized controlled trial. Results. It took approximately 646 hours to contact 1,626 individuals and enroll 554 participants (505 of whom completed the baseline survey; 45.2% were members of a underrepresented racial/ethnic group, 19.4% had no college education, 49.5% were age 30–49 y). Retention at 90-d follow-up was 93%. The total cost was USD$19,898.50. The average cost was $35.92 per participant enrolled. In-person recruitment was most successful in identifying the largest proportion of screened and eligible participants who were members of underrepresented racial/ethnic populations (32.8% and 27.8%, respectively) and with no college experience (39.7% and 33.5%, respectively); it also had the highest total cost ($8,079.17). Existing research pools identified the largest proportion of younger participants (ages 30–49 y; 39.3% and 43.4% for screened and eligible, respectively). Existing listservs yielded the smallest proportion of individuals with no college experience and the fewest members of underrepresented racial/ethnic populations but had the lowest total cost ($290.33). Newspaper ads identified the fewest younger individuals and also had the highest cost per participant enrolled ($166.21). Word of mouth had the lowest cost per participant enrolled ($10.47). Conclusion. Results help medical decision-making researchers formulate recruitment plans that increase sociodemographic diversity in study samples. We also ask funders to accommodate increased costs required to maximize sociodemographic diversity in medical decision-making research. Highlights We provide concrete strategies for recruiting, enrolling, and retaining a sociodemographically diverse study sample. We offer cost estimates for all stages of study recruitment and found that in-person recruitment was the most effective, but also the most expensive, way to identify Black participants and participants with no college experience. It is critical for investigators to have access to institutional infrastructure and resources to support conducting research that is inclusive of diverse sociodemographic groups. An intentionally diverse recruitment staff supports a diverse study sample.
first_indexed 2024-03-13T02:59:59Z
format Article
id doaj.art-c193780aa8e84982aa2bf6a4a2f04f01
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2381-4683
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-13T02:59:59Z
publishDate 2023-06-01
publisher SAGE Publishing
record_format Article
series MDM Policy & Practice
spelling doaj.art-c193780aa8e84982aa2bf6a4a2f04f012023-06-27T15:03:28ZengSAGE PublishingMDM Policy & Practice2381-46832023-06-01810.1177/23814683231183646Inclusive Recruitment Strategies to Maximize Sociodemographic Diversity among Participants: A St. Louis Case StudyChelsey R. CarterJulia MakiNicole AckermannErika A. WatersBackground. Sociodemographically diverse study samples are critical for research related to health decision making. However, not all researchers have the training, capacity, and funding to engage research methods that recruit the most diverse populations. Objective and Methods. We used participant-generated data, staff salary data, and participant observation to examine the effectiveness and cost of strategies that we used for screening, enrolling, and retaining a sociodemographically diverse sample for a risk communication and behavior change randomized controlled trial. Results. It took approximately 646 hours to contact 1,626 individuals and enroll 554 participants (505 of whom completed the baseline survey; 45.2% were members of a underrepresented racial/ethnic group, 19.4% had no college education, 49.5% were age 30–49 y). Retention at 90-d follow-up was 93%. The total cost was USD$19,898.50. The average cost was $35.92 per participant enrolled. In-person recruitment was most successful in identifying the largest proportion of screened and eligible participants who were members of underrepresented racial/ethnic populations (32.8% and 27.8%, respectively) and with no college experience (39.7% and 33.5%, respectively); it also had the highest total cost ($8,079.17). Existing research pools identified the largest proportion of younger participants (ages 30–49 y; 39.3% and 43.4% for screened and eligible, respectively). Existing listservs yielded the smallest proportion of individuals with no college experience and the fewest members of underrepresented racial/ethnic populations but had the lowest total cost ($290.33). Newspaper ads identified the fewest younger individuals and also had the highest cost per participant enrolled ($166.21). Word of mouth had the lowest cost per participant enrolled ($10.47). Conclusion. Results help medical decision-making researchers formulate recruitment plans that increase sociodemographic diversity in study samples. We also ask funders to accommodate increased costs required to maximize sociodemographic diversity in medical decision-making research. Highlights We provide concrete strategies for recruiting, enrolling, and retaining a sociodemographically diverse study sample. We offer cost estimates for all stages of study recruitment and found that in-person recruitment was the most effective, but also the most expensive, way to identify Black participants and participants with no college experience. It is critical for investigators to have access to institutional infrastructure and resources to support conducting research that is inclusive of diverse sociodemographic groups. An intentionally diverse recruitment staff supports a diverse study sample.https://doi.org/10.1177/23814683231183646
spellingShingle Chelsey R. Carter
Julia Maki
Nicole Ackermann
Erika A. Waters
Inclusive Recruitment Strategies to Maximize Sociodemographic Diversity among Participants: A St. Louis Case Study
MDM Policy & Practice
title Inclusive Recruitment Strategies to Maximize Sociodemographic Diversity among Participants: A St. Louis Case Study
title_full Inclusive Recruitment Strategies to Maximize Sociodemographic Diversity among Participants: A St. Louis Case Study
title_fullStr Inclusive Recruitment Strategies to Maximize Sociodemographic Diversity among Participants: A St. Louis Case Study
title_full_unstemmed Inclusive Recruitment Strategies to Maximize Sociodemographic Diversity among Participants: A St. Louis Case Study
title_short Inclusive Recruitment Strategies to Maximize Sociodemographic Diversity among Participants: A St. Louis Case Study
title_sort inclusive recruitment strategies to maximize sociodemographic diversity among participants a st louis case study
url https://doi.org/10.1177/23814683231183646
work_keys_str_mv AT chelseyrcarter inclusiverecruitmentstrategiestomaximizesociodemographicdiversityamongparticipantsastlouiscasestudy
AT juliamaki inclusiverecruitmentstrategiestomaximizesociodemographicdiversityamongparticipantsastlouiscasestudy
AT nicoleackermann inclusiverecruitmentstrategiestomaximizesociodemographicdiversityamongparticipantsastlouiscasestudy
AT erikaawaters inclusiverecruitmentstrategiestomaximizesociodemographicdiversityamongparticipantsastlouiscasestudy