Et forsvar for hus som har kommet i knestående
Norwegian cultural heritage management is based on a developed and strict legislation. The administration is placed under the Ministry of Environment and the different categories of cultural heritage are handled by a professional staff with different academic backgrounds, relevant to the categories....
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Septentrio Academic Publishing
2015-12-01
|
| Series: | Nordlit: Tidsskrift i litteratur og kultur |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://septentrio.uit.no/index.php/nordlit/article/view/3687 |
| _version_ | 1797334098680741888 |
|---|---|
| author | Reidar Bertelsen |
| author_facet | Reidar Bertelsen |
| author_sort | Reidar Bertelsen |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Norwegian cultural heritage management is based on a developed and strict legislation. The administration is placed under the Ministry of Environment and the different categories of cultural heritage are handled by a professional staff with different academic backgrounds, relevant to the categories. The ideology of cultural heritage management has changed through time and the present motto is “Vern gjennom bruk” (Protection through use).
The legislation, the categories linked to different academic disciplines, the motto and the influence of the demands derived from a modern lifestyle add up to an interesting contrast in the handling of buildings. Priority is given to buildings in a relatively stable condition of decay, called archaeological sites, and to buildings with a potential for use in a modern context after reconstruction, called architectural monuments.
Buildings between these two categories, especially those that are in a state of dynamic decay, are in general ignored or destroyed. This paper discusses the resources we overlook by this policy and practice of management. The author argues that an exposure of the process of dynamic decay has a potential for a deeper understanding of both history and cultural heritage. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-08T08:14:48Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-c1a5fe6b436f4249830f309da1025d7b |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 0809-1668 1503-2086 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-08T08:14:48Z |
| publishDate | 2015-12-01 |
| publisher | Septentrio Academic Publishing |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Nordlit: Tidsskrift i litteratur og kultur |
| spelling | doaj.art-c1a5fe6b436f4249830f309da1025d7b2024-02-02T07:47:19ZengSeptentrio Academic PublishingNordlit: Tidsskrift i litteratur og kultur0809-16681503-20862015-12-013610.7557/13.36873432Et forsvar for hus som har kommet i kneståendeReidar Bertelsen0UiT Norges arktiske universitetNorwegian cultural heritage management is based on a developed and strict legislation. The administration is placed under the Ministry of Environment and the different categories of cultural heritage are handled by a professional staff with different academic backgrounds, relevant to the categories. The ideology of cultural heritage management has changed through time and the present motto is “Vern gjennom bruk” (Protection through use). The legislation, the categories linked to different academic disciplines, the motto and the influence of the demands derived from a modern lifestyle add up to an interesting contrast in the handling of buildings. Priority is given to buildings in a relatively stable condition of decay, called archaeological sites, and to buildings with a potential for use in a modern context after reconstruction, called architectural monuments. Buildings between these two categories, especially those that are in a state of dynamic decay, are in general ignored or destroyed. This paper discusses the resources we overlook by this policy and practice of management. The author argues that an exposure of the process of dynamic decay has a potential for a deeper understanding of both history and cultural heritage.https://septentrio.uit.no/index.php/nordlit/article/view/3687kulturminneforvaltningkulturminnevernbygningsvernbygninger i forfallforfallets verdi |
| spellingShingle | Reidar Bertelsen Et forsvar for hus som har kommet i knestående Nordlit: Tidsskrift i litteratur og kultur kulturminneforvaltning kulturminnevern bygningsvern bygninger i forfall forfallets verdi |
| title | Et forsvar for hus som har kommet i knestående |
| title_full | Et forsvar for hus som har kommet i knestående |
| title_fullStr | Et forsvar for hus som har kommet i knestående |
| title_full_unstemmed | Et forsvar for hus som har kommet i knestående |
| title_short | Et forsvar for hus som har kommet i knestående |
| title_sort | et forsvar for hus som har kommet i knestaende |
| topic | kulturminneforvaltning kulturminnevern bygningsvern bygninger i forfall forfallets verdi |
| url | https://septentrio.uit.no/index.php/nordlit/article/view/3687 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT reidarbertelsen etforsvarforhussomharkommetiknestaende |