1 Timothy 1:3–4 in the Memory of Irenaeus, Tertullian, Athanasius, and Chrysostom

In this article, I discuss reception history, its place within the history of historical critical methods, and social memory theory. I apply a reception historical lens buttressed by social memory theory to 1 Timothy 1:3–4. I show that the historical circumstances of this passage’s reception problem...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Michael Scott Robertson
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2023-08-01
Series:Religions
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/14/9/1123
_version_ 1797577399124099072
author Michael Scott Robertson
author_facet Michael Scott Robertson
author_sort Michael Scott Robertson
collection DOAJ
description In this article, I discuss reception history, its place within the history of historical critical methods, and social memory theory. I apply a reception historical lens buttressed by social memory theory to 1 Timothy 1:3–4. I show that the historical circumstances of this passage’s reception problematize using early understandings of it to reconstruct the referent behind “myths and endless genealogies”. I first show how the phrase “myths and endless genealogies” is ambiguous in the historical setting of the author. Then, I demonstrate that Irenaeus, Tertullian, Athanasius, and Chrysostom use this phrase against very different groups; however, all of these authors use 1 Timothy 1:4 for a (perceived) problem against their present group.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T22:07:43Z
format Article
id doaj.art-c1b4279cf43744328b9b163277b5413b
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2077-1444
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T22:07:43Z
publishDate 2023-08-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Religions
spelling doaj.art-c1b4279cf43744328b9b163277b5413b2023-11-19T12:45:21ZengMDPI AGReligions2077-14442023-08-01149112310.3390/rel140911231 Timothy 1:3–4 in the Memory of Irenaeus, Tertullian, Athanasius, and ChrysostomMichael Scott Robertson0Beyond Canon Collaborative Research Group, Universität Regensburg, 93040 Regensburg, GermanyIn this article, I discuss reception history, its place within the history of historical critical methods, and social memory theory. I apply a reception historical lens buttressed by social memory theory to 1 Timothy 1:3–4. I show that the historical circumstances of this passage’s reception problematize using early understandings of it to reconstruct the referent behind “myths and endless genealogies”. I first show how the phrase “myths and endless genealogies” is ambiguous in the historical setting of the author. Then, I demonstrate that Irenaeus, Tertullian, Athanasius, and Chrysostom use this phrase against very different groups; however, all of these authors use 1 Timothy 1:4 for a (perceived) problem against their present group.https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/14/9/1123historical criticismreception historymemoryhermeneuticsPastoral Epistles1 Timothy
spellingShingle Michael Scott Robertson
1 Timothy 1:3–4 in the Memory of Irenaeus, Tertullian, Athanasius, and Chrysostom
Religions
historical criticism
reception history
memory
hermeneutics
Pastoral Epistles
1 Timothy
title 1 Timothy 1:3–4 in the Memory of Irenaeus, Tertullian, Athanasius, and Chrysostom
title_full 1 Timothy 1:3–4 in the Memory of Irenaeus, Tertullian, Athanasius, and Chrysostom
title_fullStr 1 Timothy 1:3–4 in the Memory of Irenaeus, Tertullian, Athanasius, and Chrysostom
title_full_unstemmed 1 Timothy 1:3–4 in the Memory of Irenaeus, Tertullian, Athanasius, and Chrysostom
title_short 1 Timothy 1:3–4 in the Memory of Irenaeus, Tertullian, Athanasius, and Chrysostom
title_sort 1 timothy 1 3 4 in the memory of irenaeus tertullian athanasius and chrysostom
topic historical criticism
reception history
memory
hermeneutics
Pastoral Epistles
1 Timothy
url https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/14/9/1123
work_keys_str_mv AT michaelscottrobertson 1timothy134inthememoryofirenaeustertullianathanasiusandchrysostom