Ijtiḥād in Directing the Complicated Articles in the Principles of Islamic Jurisprudence Ibn Taymiyyah as a case study

This paper aims to study a group of complicated articles in the principles of Islamic jurisprudence that Taqi al-Din Ibn Taymiyyah dealt with and directed, after reviewing his work thoroughly, the selection fell on four articles, which are: Al-Samaniyah’s article on limiting the perceptions...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Jaafar Qassas
Format: Article
Language:Arabic
Published: Umm Al-Qura University 2023-09-01
Series:Journal of Umm Al-Qura University for Shari'ah Sciences and Islamic Studies
Online Access:https://uqu.edu.sa/en/jill/134499
_version_ 1797679319145775104
author Jaafar Qassas
author_facet Jaafar Qassas
author_sort Jaafar Qassas
collection DOAJ
description This paper aims to study a group of complicated articles in the principles of Islamic jurisprudence that Taqi al-Din Ibn Taymiyyah dealt with and directed, after reviewing his work thoroughly, the selection fell on four articles, which are: Al-Samaniyah’s article on limiting the perceptions of knowledge to the senses, the article of the majority of the scholars of the principles of Islamic Jurisprudence on the scarcity of the overall memorized text, the article of Al-Shāfiʿī and Ahmad regarding the negation of abrogation of the Qur’an for the Sunnah, And Al-ʿAnbari’s article on correcting every Mujtahid (the one giving an independent reasoning). The paper dealt in each article with three issues: its origin, the point of its complication, and Ibn Taymiyyah’s treatment of it. In studying the articles presented, the researcher adopted the critical analytical approach. This paper concluded that: the distinction of al-Taimi’s work due to the wide reading of articles, and a thorough critic in dealing with the articles at the level of authenticating, reviewing and directing, addressing the complicated issues that the scholars are less exposed to, with the investigation of Ibn Taymiyyah's directives to these articles. The study recommended careful reviewing of articles in this field, investigating their issues, and treating them according to the correct approach, giving observations and correcting them according to contemporary studies, and urging for extensive writing in this field according to Ibn Taymiyyah and other critics of the scholars of this discipline.
first_indexed 2024-03-11T23:12:48Z
format Article
id doaj.art-c1bf9c11869a4d3cbd1d83285d562a55
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1658-8738
language Arabic
last_indexed 2024-03-11T23:12:48Z
publishDate 2023-09-01
publisher Umm Al-Qura University
record_format Article
series Journal of Umm Al-Qura University for Shari'ah Sciences and Islamic Studies
spelling doaj.art-c1bf9c11869a4d3cbd1d83285d562a552023-09-21T06:44:39ZaraUmm Al-Qura UniversityJournal of Umm Al-Qura University for Shari'ah Sciences and Islamic Studies1658-87382023-09-019316018010.54940/si15573536Ijtiḥād in Directing the Complicated Articles in the Principles of Islamic Jurisprudence Ibn Taymiyyah as a case studyJaafar Qassas This paper aims to study a group of complicated articles in the principles of Islamic jurisprudence that Taqi al-Din Ibn Taymiyyah dealt with and directed, after reviewing his work thoroughly, the selection fell on four articles, which are: Al-Samaniyah’s article on limiting the perceptions of knowledge to the senses, the article of the majority of the scholars of the principles of Islamic Jurisprudence on the scarcity of the overall memorized text, the article of Al-Shāfiʿī and Ahmad regarding the negation of abrogation of the Qur’an for the Sunnah, And Al-ʿAnbari’s article on correcting every Mujtahid (the one giving an independent reasoning). The paper dealt in each article with three issues: its origin, the point of its complication, and Ibn Taymiyyah’s treatment of it. In studying the articles presented, the researcher adopted the critical analytical approach. This paper concluded that: the distinction of al-Taimi’s work due to the wide reading of articles, and a thorough critic in dealing with the articles at the level of authenticating, reviewing and directing, addressing the complicated issues that the scholars are less exposed to, with the investigation of Ibn Taymiyyah's directives to these articles. The study recommended careful reviewing of articles in this field, investigating their issues, and treating them according to the correct approach, giving observations and correcting them according to contemporary studies, and urging for extensive writing in this field according to Ibn Taymiyyah and other critics of the scholars of this discipline.https://uqu.edu.sa/en/jill/134499
spellingShingle Jaafar Qassas
Ijtiḥād in Directing the Complicated Articles in the Principles of Islamic Jurisprudence Ibn Taymiyyah as a case study
Journal of Umm Al-Qura University for Shari'ah Sciences and Islamic Studies
title Ijtiḥād in Directing the Complicated Articles in the Principles of Islamic Jurisprudence Ibn Taymiyyah as a case study
title_full Ijtiḥād in Directing the Complicated Articles in the Principles of Islamic Jurisprudence Ibn Taymiyyah as a case study
title_fullStr Ijtiḥād in Directing the Complicated Articles in the Principles of Islamic Jurisprudence Ibn Taymiyyah as a case study
title_full_unstemmed Ijtiḥād in Directing the Complicated Articles in the Principles of Islamic Jurisprudence Ibn Taymiyyah as a case study
title_short Ijtiḥād in Directing the Complicated Articles in the Principles of Islamic Jurisprudence Ibn Taymiyyah as a case study
title_sort ijtihad in directing the complicated articles in the principles of islamic jurisprudence ibn taymiyyah as a case study
url https://uqu.edu.sa/en/jill/134499
work_keys_str_mv AT jaafarqassas ijtihadindirectingthecomplicatedarticlesintheprinciplesofislamicjurisprudenceibntaymiyyahasacasestudy